← Your dashboard·HoC · 45-1active
Official record· LEGISinfoHouse of Commons · Bill C-10

C-10 · Commissioner for Modern Treaty Implementation Act

An Act respecting the Commissioner for Modern Treaty Implementation

Introduced Sep 25, 2025·Sponsor: Rebecca AltyLPCMEDIUM
AI-assisted analysis
At a glance
  • Creates the position of Commissioner for Modern Treaty Implementation.
  • Establishes the Office of the Commissioner to support its activities.
  • Conducts reviews and audits of government compliance with modern treaties.
  • Makes changes to other acts to support this new office.
Indigenous communitiesGovernment institutionsPolicy makers
AI-assisted analysis
What's actually in this bill
Why this bill matters

This bill establishes key mechanisms to improve how modern treaties are implemented between the Canadian government and Indigenous peoples, promoting better rights recognition and governance for Indigenous communities. It seeks to strengthen relationships through official recognition and enhanced oversight of treaty processes.

The tradeoff

The establishment of the Commissioner's office may enhance the implementation of treaties but could also create new bureaucratic layers that slow down decision-making in treaty-related matters.

BROADA broad bill spanning 2 related subjects.
What it actually covers
Commissioner for Modern Treaty ImplementationRecognition of Indigenous Treaty Partners
Full billCommissioner for Modern Treaty Implementation
What it does

This Act establishes the Office of the Commissioner for Modern Treaty Implementation to oversee the implementation of modern treaties between the Government of Canada and Indigenous peoples. It defines the Commissioner's powers, duties, and appointment process, ensuring consultation with Indigenous partners.

Why it matters

This Act aims to enhance the relationship between the Canadian government and Indigenous peoples by ensuring that modern treaties are implemented effectively. Its success could lead to improved governance and rights for Indigenous communities.

The problem it addresses

This legislation addresses the gap in oversight and implementation of modern treaties, which has historically been inconsistent.

Who benefits

Indigenous modern treaty partners benefit from better oversight and accountability in the realization of treaty obligations.

The tradeoff

The increased oversight power of the Commissioner may impose additional obligations on government institutions, which could lead to bureaucratic burdens or slower processes in treaty-related activities.

Indigenous peoplesGovernment institutionsCommissioner for Modern Treaty ImplementationIndigenous modern treaty partnersParliamentary committees
Read the actual text (41)
Short title

1This Act may be cited as the Commissioner for Modern Treaty Implementation Act .

Definitions

2The following definitions apply in this Act. Commissioner means the Commissioner for Modern Treaty Implementation appointed under section 6 . ( commissaire ) government institution means any entity named in Schedule I, I.1, II or III to the Financial Administration Act . ( institution fédérale ) Indigenous modern treaty partner means an Indigenous entity who is named in the schedule. ( partenaire autochtone à un traité moderne ) Indigenous peoples has the meaning assigned by the definition aboriginal peoples of Canada in subsection 35(2) of the Constitution Act, 1982 . ( peuples autochtones ) Minister means the Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations or any other member of the King’s Privy Council for Canada who may be designated under section 4 . ( ministre ) modern treaty means a treaty, as referred to in section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982 , entered into by His Majesty in Right of Canada and an Indigenous people and that comes into force after 1974, as amended from time to time in accordance with its provisions. ( traité moderne ) Office means the Office of the Commissioner for Modern Treaty Implementation established under section 18 . ( Commissariat )

Interpretation — related agreements

3For the purposes of this Act, a reference to the implementation of a modern treaty is to be interpreted as also referring to the implementation of any agreement related to the implementation of the modern treaty, including any associated self-government agreement.

Designation of Minister

4The Governor in Council may, by order, designate a member of the King’s Privy Council for Canada as the Minister for the purposes of this Act.

Amendments to this Act

5(1) Except as provided in subsection (2), the Minister must consult with Indigenous modern treaty partners with respect to any legislative proposal of the Government of Canada to amend this Act. Amendments to schedule (2) In the case of an amendment to the schedule, other than an amendment made by order under section 34 , the Minister must consult with (a) in the case of replacing or deleting the name of an Indigenous modern treaty partner, that Indigenous modern treaty partner; or (b) in the case of adding the name of an Indigenous entity who has entered into a modern treaty or who has been designated by an Indigenous entity who has entered into a modern treaty, the Indigenous entity to be named in the schedule.

Appointment

6(1) The Governor in Council must, on the recommendation of the Minister made after the Minister has consulted with Indigenous modern treaty partners, appoint a Commissioner for Modern Treaty Implementation, by commission under the Great Seal, after (a) consultation with the Leader of the Government in the Senate or Government Representative in the Senate, the Leader of the Opposition in the Senate, the leader or facilitator of every other recognized party or parliamentary group in the Senate and the leader of every recognized party in the House of Commons; and (b) approval of the appointment by resolution of the Senate and House of Commons. Tenure and removal (2) Subject to the other provisions of this section, the Commissioner holds office during good behaviour for a term not exceeding seven years but may be removed by the Governor in Council for cause at any time on address of the Senate and House of Commons. Reappointment (3) The Commissioner is eligible to be reappointed to that office for one additional term. Interim appointment (4) In the event of the absence or incapacity of the Commissioner, or if that office is vacant, the Governor in Council may appoint any qualified person to hold that office in the interim for a term not exceeding six months, and that person, while holding office, is to be paid the salary or other remuneration and expenses that are fixed by the Governor in Council. Knowledge and experience (5) The Governor in Council must take into consideration, in appointing any person as the Commissioner or the interim Commissioner, the person’s knowledge and experience in relation to modern treaties or agreements referred to in section 3 .

Rank, powers and duties generally

7(1) The Commissioner ranks as, and has all the powers of, a deputy head of a department. They must engage exclusively in the duties of the office of the Commissioner under this Act or any other Act of Parliament and must not hold any other office under His Majesty in Right of Canada for reward or engage in any other employment for reward. Salary and expenses (2) The Commissioner is to be paid the salary or other remuneration that is fixed by the Governor in Council and is entitled to be paid reasonable travel and living expenses incurred while absent from their ordinary place of work in the course of performing their duties under this Act or any other Act of Parliament. Other benefits (3) The Commissioner is deemed to be an employee for the purposes of the Government Employees Compensation Act and to be employed in the federal public administration for the purposes of any regulations made under section 9 of the Aeronautics Act . Conflict of interest (4) The Commissioner must not take part in any matter that involves the Office and that would place them in a conflict of interest, but they are not in a conflict of interest merely because they are a citizen, member, participant or beneficiary referred to in a modern treaty or agreement referred to in section 3 or a person enrolled under such a treaty or agreement.

Mandate

8The Commissioner must independently exercise their powers and perform their duties and functions set out in this Act or any other Act of Parliament for the purpose of assessing whether the activities of any government institution related to the implementation of modern treaties are consistent with the objectives of (a) strengthening the relationships between the Government of Canada and Indigenous modern treaty partners; (b) fulfilling the Government of Canada’s obligations under, and achieving the objectives of, modern treaties, these obligations and objectives being interpreted in a broad and purposive manner; and (c) upholding the honour of the Crown in respect of the timely and effective implementation of modern treaties.

Reviews and performance audits

9(1) The Commissioner may conduct, in respect of any activity of any government institution relating to the implementation of modern treaties, any review or performance audit that the Commissioner considers appropriate. The Commissioner may also conduct a review or performance audit in respect of such an activity when the matter is referred to the Commissioner by the Minister, any other minister or an Indigenous modern treaty partner. Reviews and performance audits provided for in a modern treaty (2) In the case of a modern treaty, an agreement referred to in section 3 or an Act that implements a modern treaty providing for the conduct of any review or performance audit with respect to the implementation of the modern treaty, the Commissioner is not responsible for conducting that review or performance audit. For greater certainty, the Commissioner may nonetheless exercise their discretion under subsection (1) in the case of such a modern treaty, agreement or Act. Clarification (3) For greater certainty, a review or performance audit provided for in this Act is not a substitute for a dispute resolution process provided for in a modern treaty, an agreement referred to in section 3 or an Act that implements a modern treaty.

Procedures and manner

10(1) Subject to the other provisions of this Act, the Commissioner has discretion to determine the procedures to be followed and the manner in which their powers are to be exercised or their duties or functions are to be performed, including in the course of reviews and performance audits. Priorities (2) The Commissioner has discretion to set their own priorities and determine the number and frequency of reviews, performance audits and briefings that they conduct annually. Review guidelines (3) The Commissioner must develop and publish guidelines regarding the conduct of reviews. Duties of Commissioner — reviews (4) For each review, the Commissioner must, after engaging with relevant Indigenous modern treaty partners, determine the terms of the review and the procedures and methodology to be followed. Auditing standards (5) The Commissioner must conduct performance audits in accordance with the generally accepted auditing standards for performance audits, the primary source of which is the Handbook of the Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada, as amended from time to time.

Report

11(1) On completion of each review or performance audit, the Commissioner must prepare a report setting out (a) the methodology that was followed in the course of the review or performance audit; (b) their findings on whether the government institution’s activities, or any Act of Parliament or regulations made under an Act of Parliament, related to the implementation of any modern treaty are consistent with the objectives set out in paragraphs 8 (a) to (c); and (c) the recommendations that they consider appropriate with a view to achieving those objectives. Other findings and recommendations (2) The Commissioner may include in the report any finding or recommendation that they consider appropriate in respect of (a) the implementation of modern treaties by government institutions; (b) any policy of the Government of Canada relating to the implementation of modern treaties; or (c) the Commissioner’s mandate, powers, duties or functions.

Draft — government institutions

12(1) The Commissioner must provide every government institution that is the subject of a review or performance audit with a draft of the preliminary findings and recommendations relevant to the government institution and inform the government institution that it must respond in writing, within the time limit specified by the Commissioner, to those findings and recommendations. Draft — Indigenous modern treaty partners (2) The Commissioner must provide every Indigenous modern treaty partner with a draft of the preliminary findings and recommendations relevant to the Indigenous modern treaty partner and inform the Indigenous modern treaty partner that it may respond in writing, within the time limit specified by the Commissioner, to those findings and recommendations. Response of institution (3) The government institution must provide the Commissioner with a written response to the relevant preliminary findings and recommendations within the specified time limit. Inclusion in final report (4) The Commissioner must set out, in the final report referred to in section 13 , all responses that they received within the specified time limit from government institutions and Indigenous modern treaty partners.

Final report

13(1) The Commissioner must submit a final report of each review or performance audit to the Speakers of the Senate and the House of Commons. Tabling of report (2) The Speakers must table the final report in their respective Houses on any of the next 15 days on which that House is sitting after the day on which the Speaker receives the report. Copy of report (3) Once the final report is tabled, the Commissioner must provide a copy of the report to the relevant Indigenous modern treaty partners. Referral to committee (4) After it is tabled, the report stands referred to the committee of the Senate, of the House of Commons or of both Houses of Parliament that may be designated or established for the purpose of reviewing it.

Briefings

14The Commissioner may meet with any Minister or Indigenous modern treaty partner, as the Commissioner considers appropriate, or with any committee designated or established by Parliament at the committee’s request, in order to brief the Minister, Indigenous modern treaty partner or committee on any matter related to the Commissioner’s mandate or powers, duties and functions.

Coordination of activities

15To avoid unnecessary overlap or duplication of work in relation to the fulfillment of their respective mandates, the Commissioner must take all reasonable steps to coordinate their activities with those of the Office of the Auditor General of Canada and any body prescribed by regulation.

Information sharing

16The Commissioner may provide the Auditor General of Canada or any body prescribed by regulation with any information that has been received or obtained under this Act from a government institution and that is related to the fulfillment of the mandate of the Auditor General or body, subject to the provisions of any other Act of Parliament that restrict the information to which the Auditor General of Canada or body may have access.

Delegation

17The Commissioner may authorize, subject to the restrictions that the Commissioner may specify, any competent person to exercise any of the powers, or perform any of the duties or functions, of the Commissioner under this Act or any other Act of Parliament, except the power to delegate under this section and the powers, duties or functions referred to in subsections 13 (1), 28 (1) and 29 (1).

Establishment

18The Office of the Commissioner for Modern Treaty Implementation is established for the purpose of assisting the Commissioner in the fulfillment of their mandate, the exercise of their powers and the performance of their duties and functions.

Head office

19The head office of the Office is to be at the place in Canada that is designated by the Governor in Council, on the recommendation of the Minister.

Staff

20(1) Any officers and employees that are necessary to enable the Commissioner to fulfill the mandate and exercise the powers and perform the duties and functions of the Commissioner under this Act or any other Act of Parliament are to be appointed in accordance with the Public Service Employment Act and the provisions of the Public Service Employment Act apply to those officers and employees. Technical or specialized assistance (2) The Commissioner may engage on a temporary basis the services of persons having technical or specialized knowledge of any matter relating to the work of the Commissioner in order to advise and assist the Commissioner in the fulfillment of the mandate of, or the exercise of the powers or the performance of the duties or functions of, the Commissioner under this Act or any other Act of Parliament and, with the approval of the Treasury Board, may fix and pay the salary, other remuneration and expenses of those persons. Conflict of interest (3) The officers, employees and persons having technical or specialized knowledge must not accept or hold an office or employment that is inconsistent with their duties or take part in any matter that involves the Office that would place them in a conflict of interest, but they are not in a conflict of interest merely because they are a citizen, member, participant or beneficiary referred to in a modern treaty or agreement referred to in section 3 or a person enrolled under such a treaty or agreement.

No summons

21The Commissioner, or any person acting on behalf or under the direction of the Commissioner, is not a competent or compellable witness in respect of any matter that comes to the knowledge of the Commissioner or that person in the exercise or purported exercise of their powers, or in the performance or purported performance of their duties or functions, under this Act or any other Act of Parliament.

Protection from prosecution

22No criminal or civil proceedings lie against the Commissioner, or against any person acting on behalf or under the direction of the Commissioner, for anything done, reported or said in good faith in the exercise or purported exercise of their powers, or the performance or purported performance of their duties or functions, under this Act or any other Act of Parliament.

Defamation

23No action lies in defamation with respect to (a) anything said, any information provided or any document or thing produced in good faith by or on behalf or under the direction of the Commissioner, in the exercise or purported exercise of any power, or the performance or purported performance of any duty or function, under this Act or any other Act of Parliament; or (b) any report prepared in good faith by the Commissioner in the exercise or purported exercise of any power, or the performance or purported performance of any duty or function, under this Act or any other Act of Parliament, or any fair and accurate account of the report made in good faith.

Access to information

24Except as provided by any other Act of Parliament that expressly refers to this section, the Commissioner is entitled, at all convenient times, to free access to information, from a government institution, that relates to the fulfillment of the mandate, the exercise of the powers or the performance of the duties or functions of the Commissioner and is also entitled to require and receive from a government institution any information, reports and explanations that the Commissioner considers necessary for that purpose.

Provision of information

25(1) The Minister and the Commissioner may enter into discussions with respect to the provision to the Commissioner, by government institutions, of information, reports and explanations that are relevant to the fulfillment of the mandate, the exercise of the powers or the performance of the duties or functions of the Commissioner. The discussions may lead to the development of a joint protocol to improve, to the extent possible, that provision of information, reports or explanations. Necessary steps — joint protocol (2) If the Commissioner is of the opinion that they have not received from a government institution the information necessary to fulfill their mandate, exercise their powers or perform their duties or functions, the Minister and the Commissioner must (a) enter into discussions with respect to the provision of that information to the Commissioner; and (b) take the necessary steps to develop a joint protocol for the provision, to the extent possible, of that information to the Commissioner.

Security requirements

26The Commissioner and every person acting on behalf or under the direction of the Commissioner who receives or obtains information under this Act or any other Act of Parliament must, with respect to access to and use of that information, satisfy any security requirements applicable to, and take any oath of secrecy required to be taken by, persons who normally have access to and use that information.

Non-disclosure

27Subject to section 16 , the Commissioner and every person acting on behalf or under the direction of the Commissioner must not disclose any personal, privileged or confidential information that comes to their knowledge in the exercise or purported exercise of their powers, or the performance or purported performance of their duties or functions, under this Act or any other Act of Parliament.

Annual report

28(1) The Commissioner must, as soon as feasible after the end of each calendar year, prepare and submit to the Minister an annual report setting out (a) the activities of the Office during that year; and (b) the findings and recommendations that were set out in the reports submitted under subsection 13 (1) during that year. Tabling of report (2) The Minister must cause a copy of the annual report to be tabled before each House of Parliament on any of the next 15 days on which that House is sitting after the day on which the Minister receives it. Referral to committee (3) After it is tabled, the report stands referred to the committee of the Senate, of the House of Commons or of both Houses of Parliament that may be designated or established for the purpose of reviewing it.

Special reports

29(1) The Commissioner may, at any time, prepare and submit to the Minister a special report on any matter relating to the Commissioner’s mandate or powers, duties and functions under this Act or any other Act of Parliament that is, in the opinion of the Commissioner, of such pressing urgency or importance that it should not be deferred until the submission of the next annual report under section 28 . Tabling of report (2) The Minister must cause a copy of the special report to be tabled before each House of Parliament on any of the next 15 days on which that House is sitting after the day on which the Minister receives it. Referral to committee (3) After it is tabled, the report stands referred to the committee of the Senate, of the House of Commons or of both Houses of Parliament that may be designated or established for the purpose of reviewing it.

Parliamentary review

30(1) Within 10 years after the day on which this section comes into force and before each subsequent 10th anniversary of that day, the committee of the Senate, of the House of Commons or of both Houses of Parliament that may be designated or established for that purpose must conduct a review of this Act and of its administration and operation. Consultations (2) The committee must consult with Indigenous modern treaty partners in the course of the review. Report (3) The committee must prepare a report, and table it in the Senate, the House of Commons or both Houses of Parliament, setting out the results of the review and the committee’s findings and recommendations.

Independent review

31(1) Within five years after the day on which this section comes into force and every seven years after that, the Minister must cause to be conducted an independent review of this Act, of its administration and operation and of the activities of the Office. The review must be conducted by a competent person appointed by the Minister, or a body designated by the Minister, after consultation with Indigenous modern treaty partners. Report (2) The person or body that conducts the review must prepare and submit to the Minister a report setting out the results of the review and their findings and recommendations regarding, among other things, (a) any measures that would contribute to the fulfillment of the objectives of this Act; and (b) any changes to be made to this Act in relation to, among other things, the mandate or the powers, duties or functions of the Commissioner or the activities of the Office. Consultations (3) The person or body that conducts the review must consult with Indigenous modern treaty partners in the course of the review, including on the findings and recommendations that should be included in the report. Tabling of report (4) The Minister must cause a copy of the report to be tabled before each House of Parliament on any of the first 15 days on which that House is sitting after the day on which the Minister receives it. Referral to committee (5) After it is tabled, the report stands referred to the committee of the Senate, of the House of Commons or of both Houses of Parliament that may be designated or established for the purpose of reviewing it.

Regulation-making powers

32The Governor in Council may make regulations (a) prescribing any body for the purposes of sections 15 and 16 ; and (b) generally for carrying out the purposes and provisions of this Act.

Collaboration

33The Governor in Council must ensure that the Commissioner and Indigenous modern treaty partners are afforded a meaningful opportunity to collaborate in policy development leading to the making of regulations under section 32 .

Amendment to schedule — replacement or deletion

34(1) The Governor in Council may, by order, amend the schedule by replacing or deleting the name of an Indigenous modern treaty partner, on the recommendation of the Minister after consultation by the Minister with the Indigenous modern treaty partner to whom the amendment relates. Addition to schedule (2) The Governor in Council may, by order, amend the schedule by adding the name of any Indigenous entity who has entered into a modern treaty or who has been designated by an Indigenous entity who has entered into a modern treaty, on the recommendation of the Minister after consultation by the Minister with the Indigenous entity to be named in the schedule.

First annual report — six or more months

35(1) If a period of six or more months has elapsed between the day on which this section comes into force and the end of the calendar year in which this section comes into force, the Commissioner must prepare and submit to the Minister, as soon as feasible after the end of that calendar year, a first report setting out the information referred to in paragraphs 28 (1)(a) and (b) for that period. First annual report — fewer than six months (2) If the elapsed period is fewer than six months, the Commissioner must prepare and submit to the Minister, as soon as feasible after the end of the calendar year following that period, a first report setting out the information referred to in paragraphs 28 (1)(a) and (b) for that period and that calendar year.

36Schedule I to the Access to Information Act is amended by adding the following in alphabetical order under the heading “Other Government Institutions”: Office of the Commissioner for Modern Treaty Implementation Commissariat à la mise en oeuvre des traités modernes

37Schedule I.1 to the Financial Administration Act is amended by adding, in alphabetical order in column I, a reference to Office of the Commissioner for Modern Treaty Implementation Commissariat à la mise en oeuvre des traités modernes and the corresponding reference in column II to “Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations”.

38Schedule IV to the Act is amended by adding the following in alphabetical order: Office of the Commissioner for Modern Treaty Implementation Commissariat à la mise en oeuvre des traités modernes

39The schedule to the Privacy Act is amended by adding the following in alphabetical order under the heading “Other Government Institutions”: Office of the Commissioner for Modern Treaty Implementation Commissariat à la mise en oeuvre des traités modernes

40Part II of Schedule I to the Public Service Superannuation Act is amended by adding the following in alphabetical order: Commissioner for Modern Treaty Implementation and Office of the Commissioner for Modern Treaty Implementation Commissaire à la mise en oeuvre des traités modernes et Commissariat à la mise en oeuvre des traités modernes

41Subsection 24(3) of the Official Languages Act is amended by striking out “and” at the end of paragraph (e) and by adding the following after that paragraph: (e.1) the Office of the Commissioner for Modern Treaty Implementation; and Official Languages Act Clause 41 : Relevant portion of subsection 24(3): (3) Without restricting the generality of subsection (2), the duty set out in that subsection applies in respect of

Schedule 1Recognition of Indigenous Treaty Partners
What it does

This provision lists various Indigenous governments and entities recognized as partners in modern treaties across Canada.

Why it matters

Recognizing these Indigenous groups officially acknowledges their rights and representation, which is vital for reconciliation efforts in Canada. It also ensures that these groups have a voice in discussions about land use and governance.

The problem it addresses

The bill attempts to address the historical marginalization of Indigenous governments by formalizing their roles in modern treaties.

Who benefits

Indigenous nations listed in the provision gain recognition and the potential for increased autonomy and influence in governance.

The tradeoff

The acknowledgment of these Indigenous groups may challenge existing governance structures and decision-making authorities, potentially limiting the influence of provincial or federal governments in some areas.

Indigenous NationsCanadian governmentProvincial authoritiesLocal communitiesTreaty organizations
Official record· parl.ca
Official drafter summary (parl.ca)

This enactment provides for the appointment of a Commissioner for Modern Treaty Implementation to conduct reviews and performance audits of the activities of government institutions related to the implementation of modern treaties. It also establishes the Office of the Commissioner for Modern Treaty Implementation for the purpose of assisting the Commissioner in the fulfillment of their mandate and the exercise of their powers and the performance of their duties and functions. Finally, it makes consequential amendments to other Acts. Available on the House of Commons website at the following address: www.ourcommons.ca

AI-assisted analysis
What MPs debatedCONTESTED472 speeches · 75 MPs · 113,613 words
Points of contention
  • Need for a new commissioner versus existing oversight mechanisms
  • Government's failure to negotiate modern treaties
  • Concerns over creating more bureaucracy
  • Interpretation of modern treaties and indigenous rights

The Liberals and NDP largely support the bill for accountability, while Conservatives express concerns about bureaucracy and lack of results.

Where MPs stood72 MPs · grouped by party · ranked by speaking volume
AI-assisted analysis
CPC36 spoke · 0 support · 34 oppose
Ellis Ross
Ellis RossOPPOSES20 speeches · 5,575 words
Criticized the creation of a treaty commissioner as unnecessary when existing agreements and oversight mechanisms are ignored.Creating another position to implement what the government should have been doing right from day one would just give first nations and the Canadian public a false sense of security.
Jamie Schmale
Jamie SchmaleOPPOSES17 speeches · 4,227 words
Criticized the lack of enforcement and accountability in the legislation.The Liberal government’s proposed Bill C-10...simply provides cover for its decade-long history of broken promises to indigenous peoples.
Garnett Genuis
Garnett GenuisOPPOSES8 speeches · 3,326 words
Criticized Bill C-10 for creating unnecessary bureaucracy around modern treaties.Bill C-10 would add an additional bureaucratic system around adherence to modern treaties. [...] instead of focusing on trying to look good on these issues, the government take seriously the need for substantive policy change.
Eric Melillo
Eric MelilloOPPOSES10 speeches · 2,570 words
Criticized the bill as unnecessary and a duplication of current accountability measures.What we are seeing right now is that the dollars are bloating the government bureaucracy and not getting to the communities and the folks who need it.
Dane Lloyd
Dane LloydOPPOSES6 speeches · 2,276 words
Criticized the bill for adding bureaucracy without addressing the root problems facing indigenous peoples.Reconciliation needs to be measured by results, and ministers and their departments should be focused on meeting their existing obligations under treaties...
Arnold Viersen
Arnold ViersenOPPOSES9 speeches · 2,186 words
Criticized the bill as adding bureaucracy instead of simplifying government functions related to first nations.This bill is just adding bureaucracy instead of getting the government out of the way and doing the things that it says it is going to do.
Brad Redekopp
Brad RedekoppOPPOSES6 speeches · 2,054 words
Criticized the bill for creating more bureaucracy without addressing real issues faced by urban Indigenous communities.This legislation is presented by the government as a path to improved indigenous relations and accountability, yet... it will neither improve relations between the government and indigenous people nor increase accountability.
Tamara Kronis
Tamara KronisOPPOSES10 speeches · 1,989 words
Criticized the proposed creation of a new commissioner for modern treaty implementation as potentially creating unnecessary bureaucracy.If the government has failed to act on existing findings, what assurance do we have that another report and another office would change that?
WS
William StevensonOPPOSES6 speeches · 1,933 words
Opposed Bill C-10, arguing it duplicates existing responsibilities of the Auditor General.Bill C-10 is not a solution; it is a diversion. It is a smokescreen for a government that has failed to act.
Todd Doherty
Todd DohertyOPPOSES4 speeches · 1,889 words
Argued that Bill C-10 creates unnecessary bureaucracy without solving existing issues.We do not need another office in Ottawa to tell us again that the government is not doing what it promised to do.
Gabriel Hardy
Gabriel HardyOPPOSES5 speeches · 1,876 words
Criticized the bill for creating more bureaucracy without addressing the real issues facing indigenous communities.The idea that something will happen on the ground because there is new state intervention is just smoke and mirrors.
JM
Jacob MantleOPPOSES6 speeches · 1,863 words
Criticized the creation of a new bureaucratic position, questioning its effectiveness in addressing Indigenous treaty issues.Why can the government not just do its job? It seems that every time there is a problem... we will create a new bureaucracy.
BZ
Bob ZimmerOPPOSES7 speeches · 1,857 words
Criticized the proposed commissioner as a bureaucratic distraction that does not address accountability for indigenous affairs.The Liberal government's proposed Bill C-10... is little more than a distraction. It is a bureaucratic shield to obscure a decade of broken promises to indigenous peoples.
Michael Guglielmin
Michael GuglielminOPPOSES6 speeches · 1,781 words
Criticized the bill for potentially creating more bureaucracy rather than addressing accountability.What would do that is ministerial responsibility and clear consequences for failure.
Richard Bragdon
Richard BragdonOPPOSES5 speeches · 1,763 words
Criticized the bill as another unnecessary layer of bureaucracy that would delay needed action.I have come to the conclusion that the bill would be, once again, great in optics but probably not overwhelmingly successful in outcomes.
Dave Epp
Dave EppOPPOSES4 speeches · 1,763 words
Opposed to the creation of a new bureaucratic layer that the bill proposes.Conservatives fully support treaty rights, negotiations and the ongoing process of reconciliation with Canada's first nations, Inuit and Métis peoples. However, this bill would miss the mark.
Gérard Deltell
Gérard DeltellMIXED5 speeches · 1,758 words
Argued that modern treaties are critical for economic development and must be prioritized.What we are opposing is another level of bureaucracy, with the commissioner. We have all the people in the government getting involved in that right now, and we are sure they can do the job they want the commissioner to do without having to create a new position.
Michelle Rempel Garner
Michelle Rempel GarnerOPPOSES4 speeches · 1,699 words
Criticized Bill C-10 for creating unnecessary bureaucracy that duplicates existing oversight mechanisms.This is not robust accountability. It is simply performative oversight designed to deflect criticism from the federal Liberal government's lack of action.
Brad Vis
Brad VisOPPOSES6 speeches · 1,640 words
Opposed the creation of a new officer of Parliament, arguing it duplicates existing parliamentary powers.I will oppose Bill C-10 because it confuses monitoring for delivery.
Tako Van Popta
Tako Van PoptaOPPOSES5 speeches · 1,626 words
Argued that the bill only creates more bureaucracy without addressing the real issues of treaty implementation.The bill is simply about setting up a new bureaucracy to keep an eye on existing bureaucracies that have failed time and again to get the job done.
Rhonda Kirkland
Rhonda KirklandOPPOSES8 speeches · 1,624 words
Criticized the bill for proposing another layer of bureaucracy without addressing the execution of existing treaty obligations.Reconciliation is not achieved by hiring more bureaucrats. It is achieved by honouring the commitments we have already made, enforcing obligations and delivering measurable results.
Helena Konanz
Helena KonanzOPPOSES7 speeches · 1,618 words
Argued that Bill C-10 expands bureaucracy without advancing treaty implementation.In other words, the office cannot solve failures, cannot enforce compliance and cannot even be compelled to work at the pace required to match the seriousness of the issues that are at hand.
Kelly DeRidder
Kelly DeRidderOPPOSES5 speeches · 1,614 words
Criticized the bill for creating additional bureaucracy instead of implementing existing solutions.Bill C-10 mistakes process for progress and bureaucracy for leadership.
PL
Philip LawrenceOPPOSES6 speeches · 1,596 words
Criticized the bill as creating another level of bureaucracy without action.The answer is not another level of bureaucracy. It is not another set of regulations. It is simply... when they make a promise, they live up to that promise.
Shelby Kramp-Neuman
Shelby Kramp-NeumanOPPOSES5 speeches · 1,592 words
Criticized that Bill C-10 merely creates another office without addressing the root issues faced by indigenous communities.Bill C-10 clearly, with no doubt, would only add another voice that governments have been ignoring for years.
Marc Dalton
Marc DaltonOPPOSES4 speeches · 1,525 words
Criticized the bill for creating a new bureaucracy without real power or accountability.This is not oversight; it is a public relations exercise.
Melissa Lantsman
Melissa LantsmanOPPOSES5 speeches · 1,515 words
Argued that the bill simply creates more bureaucracy without addressing the root issues of treaty implementation.Reconciliation in this country cannot be achieved by expanding Ottawa's footprint and Ottawa's bureaucracy.
Ziad Aboultaif
Ziad AboultaifOPPOSES5 speeches · 1,509 words
Criticized the addition of new bureaucracy, arguing it does not address the lack of results from the government.We do not need a commissioner for modern treaty implementation; we need a government that understands the needs of Canadians and that lives up to its commitments to them.
TJ
Tamara JansenOPPOSES3 speeches · 1,509 words
Criticized the creation of a new commissioner for modern treaty implementation as adding unnecessary bureaucracy.A new bureaucracy does not hold anyone to account; it shields ministers from responsibility.
Leslyn Lewis
Leslyn LewisOPPOSES5 speeches · 1,412 words
Criticized the bill for creating unnecessary duplication of roles and weakening ministerial accountability.At its core, the implementation of treaties is the responsibility of cabinet ministers... Bill C-10 would create a new, cabinet-appointed office to audit and monitor federal departments, effectively outsourcing a core ministerial responsibility.
Ned Kuruc
Ned KurucOPPOSES4 speeches · 812 words
Criticized the creation of a new commissioner as unnecessary bureaucracy.Frankly, words are not good enough. Canadians expect action. Indigenous communities deserve results, yet time and time again, what we see from the Liberal government is delay, deflection and more bureaucracy.
Kurt Holman
Kurt HolmanOPPOSES7 speeches · 443 words
Argued that creating a new office would add unnecessary bureaucracy and costs.the Conservatives support modern treaties, but there are concerns that with Bill C-10 , the establishment of an independent commissioner and office would lead to more government bureaucracy.
Grant Jackson
Grant JacksonOPPOSES4 speeches · 319 words
Criticized the creation of additional bureaucracy by Liberals which diverts accountability.Why can they not just get the job done and get the treaties signed?
AR
Alex RuffOPPOSES2 speeches · 261 words
Argued that increasing bureaucracy will lead to poorer service delivery.I really believe in what the member spoke about in her speech. There is a lack of accountability.
PK
Pat KellyOPPOSES2 speeches · 216 words
Argued that the government has a history of ignoring reports from officers of Parliament, questioning the efficacy of adding another officer.What would adding another officer of Parliament do, other than give the government another person whose reports it can ignore?
Kevin Waugh
Kevin WaughNEUTRAL1 speech · 112 words
Highlighted issues with federal funding for school divisions in Saskatchewan.Half of our school divisions in the province of Saskatchewan are well behind in funding from the federal government...
LPC23 spoke · 21 support · 1 oppose
Kevin Lamoureux
Kevin LamoureuxSUPPORTS47 speeches · 6,310 words
Argued that establishing a commissioner for modern treaty implementation is critical for advancing reconciliation and respecting indigenous rights.The legislation that is being proposed, Bill C-10, to establish the commissioner for modern treaty implementation, is something that is being relatively well received.
Brendan Hanley
Brendan HanleySUPPORTS11 speeches · 3,159 words
Argued that Bill C-10 is essential for modern treaty nations to ensure accountability in treaty implementation.Bill C-10 is a priority for modern treaty nations across Canada... Passing it now will ensure that arguments already made are honoured in practice and would mark another meaningful step forward on the path of reconciliation.
Lori Idlout
Lori IdloutSUPPORTS18 speeches · 3,079 words
Argued that the bill is crucial for accountability and oversight in treaty implementation.Bill C-10 would advance reconciliation and self-determination through oversight and accountability of the federal government.
RA
Rebecca AltySUPPORTS8 speeches · 2,992 words
Argued that the bill will create a more accountable government regarding modern treaty commitments.This bill is about accountability, trust and following through on our promises as a government.
Will Greaves
Will GreavesSUPPORTS5 speeches · 1,901 words
Highlighted the importance of the proposed commissioner for modern treaty implementation in addressing reconciliation with Indigenous peoples.The bottom line is that the commissioner would support Canada in being a better modern treaty partner.
Marilyn Gladu
Marilyn GladuOPPOSES5 speeches · 1,885 words
Criticized the bill for creating an additional bureaucracy with no real power to compel government action.If this position has no power over the government, then the government has just created a bureaucracy.
JB
Jaime BattisteSUPPORTS6 speeches · 1,724 words
Highlighted the importance of oversight for modern-day treaties and accountability in their implementation.What we are talking about is ensuring oversight and accountability to ensure the treaties we have signed are implemented.
Ginette Lavack
Ginette LavackSUPPORTS6 speeches · 1,686 words
Argued that the establishment of an independent commissioner will enable continuous monitoring of treaties.An independent commissioner tasked with only looking at modern treaties would also be able to help educate departments across government, which all have obligations to follow through.
Ron McKinnon
Ron McKinnonSUPPORTS7 speeches · 1,612 words
Argued that establishing the commissioner is crucial for effective implementation of modern treaties.This legislation represents a vital step forward, one that would strengthen accountability, enhance transparency and build trust with modern treaty partners across the country.
SM
Shannon MiedemaSUPPORTS5 speeches · 1,612 words
Argued that establishing a commissioner is essential for accountability and transparency in the relationship with indigenous partners.I would like to begin by honouring the Algonquin Anishinabe nation... I am honoured to rise and speak today in support of Bill C-10, which would establish a commissioner for modern treaty implementation.
Mandy Gull-Masty
Mandy Gull-MastySUPPORTS3 speeches · 1,536 words
Argued that Bill C-10 creates a necessary independent commissioner for modern treaty implementation that will enhance accountability.This is why I strongly support Bill C-10. My nation has been doing this work for 50 years. I am proud to say that this is an exercise based on respect for our culture, our identity and our language.
JN
Juanita NathanSUPPORTS7 speeches · 1,512 words
Argued that the legislation establishes essential oversight for modern treaty implementation.I am in support of this commissioner because the legislation marks an important step in advancing reconciliation by promoting transparency, fairness and the implementation of modern treaties.
AS
Abdelhaq SariSUPPORTS5 speeches · 1,492 words
Argued that establishing a commissioner for modern treaty implementation is essential for advancing reconciliation in Canada.The creation of a commissioner for modern treaty implementation represents a decisive step toward reconciliation between indigenous peoples and the federal government.
Aslam Rana
Aslam RanaSUPPORTS6 speeches · 1,415 words
Argued that the commissioner would ensure the federal government fulfills its promises under modern treaties.By living up to our promises, we can help secure a better future for modern treaty partners and all Canadians.
DO
Dominique O'RourkeSUPPORTS4 speeches · 1,357 words
Argued that Bill C-10 is essential for strengthening ties and improving lives for modern treaty partners.Today, I am honoured to rise to speak in support of Bill C‑10, which seeks to establish a commissioner for modern treaty implementation.
JD
John-Paul DankoSUPPORTS7 speeches · 486 words
Argued that the bill was developed in consultation with indigenous leaders and rights holders, ensuring accountability and trust.This legislation was co-developed with treaty partners and indigenous rights holders in order to ensure accountability, oversight and transparency and to build trust.
LC
Leslie ChurchSUPPORTS3 speeches · 359 words
Argued that the legislation is a step in the right direction for indigenous rights and reconciliation.I wholeheartedly agree that the legislation is fundamental to prosperity for all Canadians.
AK
Arielle KayabagaSUPPORTS4 speeches · 288 words
Argued for the necessity of consulting indigenous communities in the legislative process.Can the member talk about that? Why would he take that away from indigenous communities that are actually asking to be consulted to make sure that this happens?
GD
Guillaume Deschênes-ThériaultSUPPORTS2 speeches · 248 words
Argued that establishing a commissioner for modern treaty implementation would enhance oversight and accountability to Parliament.This bill would establish a commissioner for modern treaty implementation... This mechanism would provide greater transparency and accountability to Parliament.
Bienvenu-Olivier Ntumba
Bienvenu-Olivier NtumbaSUPPORTS3 speeches · 212 words
Argued that the bill represents concrete and transformative progress in Canada’s relationship with Indigenous peoples.The bill represents concrete, transformative progress in Canada's legal relationship with indigenous peoples.
Kody Blois
Kody BloisSUPPORTS1 speech · 175 words
Argued that the current government's approach to indigenous issues marks a positive difference from past Conservative governance.There is more work to be done, but what I really picked up on is that the member talked about energy and clean energy on reserve.
MG
Mark GerretsenSUPPORTS2 speeches · 120 words
Highlighted the importance of passing Bill C-10 quickly for indigenous rights.Bill C-10 is part of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act's action plan.
John-Paul Danko
John-Paul DankoMIXED2 speeches · 118 words
Argued the importance of acknowledging the horrors of residential schools and the need for truth and reconciliation.I want to take this opportunity to point out that members opposite... actively deny some of the horrors of residential schools...
BQ11 spoke · 5 support · 2 oppose
SL
Sébastien LemireSUPPORTS12 speeches · 4,153 words
Supported the bill for establishing a commissioner as vital for accountability and treaty implementation.In short, we support this bill.
Marilène Gill
Marilène GillSUPPORTS11 speeches · 3,215 words
Argued that Bill C-10 is a necessary step towards ensuring government accountability and fulfilling treaty obligations to Indigenous peoples.Bill C-10 is a step in the right direction because it is something that first nations and Inuit peoples have been calling for in terms of the signature and implementation of treaties.
Maxime Blanchette-Joncas
Maxime Blanchette-JoncasOPPOSES12 speeches · 1,560 words
Criticized the lack of real powers for the proposed commissioner, arguing they would be ineffective at enforcing treaty law.The new commissioner will have the power to analyze but not the power to compel action. This means that the commissioner would be able to paint a picture of the government's shortcomings but would not be able to change anything.
Jean-Denis Garon
Jean-Denis GaronSUPPORTS9 speeches · 1,217 words
Argued that having a commissioner is a positive step towards implementing modern treaties and improving accountability.Bill C‑10 is an important piece of legislation. It represents a significant milestone in modern treaty implementation and monitoring.
Mario Beaulieu
Mario BeaulieuMIXED9 speeches · 633 words
Supported the principle of the bill but emphasized the lack of enforcement powers for the commissioner.The Bloc Québécois supports the principle of the bill. However, we see that it does not provide for the power to enforce compliance.
Gabriel Ste-Marie
Gabriel Ste-MarieMIXED4 speeches · 402 words
Expressed support for Bill C-10, recognizing its importance in the context of Indigenous rights.Bill C‑10 creates the position of commissioner. It is a small step in the right direction, but should this position not be accompanied by the ability to make binding recommendations?
Alexis Deschênes
Alexis DeschênesSUPPORTS3 speeches · 384 words
Argued that the bill provides MPs with a tool to pressure the executive branch regarding its obligations.The Bloc Québécois supports this bill and believes that it gives parliamentarians a tool to put pressure on the executive branch in the event that it fails to meet its obligations.
MS
Mario SimardMIXED3 speeches · 278 words
Argued for the importance of treaty implementation without political games.If the past is any indiction, I would say that we have often seen the government roundly criticize the reports of the Parliamentary Budget Officer...
Rhéal Éloi Fortin
Rhéal Éloi FortinMIXED2 speeches · 233 words
Argued that the bill could be beneficial for ensuring the government honors treaties.It seems to me that having a commissioner to ensure that the federal government honours its commitments under both the Constitution and international treaties could be a good idea.
Xavier Barsalou-Duval
Xavier Barsalou-DuvalOPPOSES2 speeches · 201 words
Criticized the government's historical record on indigenous rights.the government does not have a particularly good record when it comes to respecting indigenous rights
Andréanne Larouche
Andréanne LaroucheSUPPORTS1 speech · 85 words
Commended the creation of the position established by Bill C-10 as an important step.We can only commend the creation of this position as an important step.
Legislative stages
  1. First reading (House of Commons)
    Sep 25, 2025
  2. Second reading (House of Commons)
    Feb 9, 2026