← Your dashboard·HoC · 45-1passed
Official record· LEGISinfoHouse of Commons · Bill C-12

C-12 · Strengthening Canada's Immigration System and Borders Act

An Act respecting certain measures relating to the security of Canada's borders and the integrity of the Canadian immigration system and respecting other related security measures

Introduced Oct 8, 2025·Sponsor: Gary AnandasangareeLPCHIGH
AI-assisted analysis
At a glance
  • Amends the Customs Act to provide free facilities and access for border officers.
  • Creates a faster process for adding precursor chemicals under drug laws.
  • Transfers coast guard services from Fisheries to National Defence for security.
  • Changes refugee protection processes, including information requirements and decision-making.
  • Grants the government authority to suspend or terminate processing of immigration applications.
Border services officersLaw enforcement agenciesRefugee claimantsImmigrantsCoast guard personnel
AI-assisted analysis
What's actually in this bill
Why this bill matters

This bill collectively impacts various aspects of security in Canada, from immigration processes to drug regulation and law enforcement, aiming to strengthen national safety while also potentially altering individual rights and privacy concerns.

The tradeoff

The most significant tradeoff involves increased governmental authority over immigration and law enforcement, which may enhance security but could lead to potential abuses of power and diminished protections for individuals navigating these systems.

GRAB-BAGTITLE: MISLEADINGA grab-bag bill: 13 parts across 12 different areas of law.
Why the title misleads

The title overlooks multiple critical subjects such as drug regulation changes, law enforcement exemptions, and amendments affecting money laundering and sex offender registries.

What it actually covers
Immigration System and BordersCustoms EnforcementDrug RegulationLaw Enforcement ExemptionsCoast Guard SecurityInformation Sharing in ImmigrationAsylum ProceduresGovernor in Council Powers in ImmigrationRefugee Protection IneligibilityMoney Laundering and Terrorist FinancingFinancial Institution OversightSex Offender Registration
PART 1Access and facilities for customs enforcement
What it does

This part of the bill amends the Customs Act to require operators of international transportation facilities to provide free access and accommodations for customs enforcement. It also allows customs officers access to goods destined for export at certain locations.

Why it matters

This matters because it facilitates the enforcement of customs laws, potentially increasing border security and proper inspection of goods. It impacts trade by streamlining customs processes but can also affect the operations of transportation facilities.

The problem it addresses

The provisions address the need for adequate facilities and access to enhance the administration and enforcement of customs laws.

Who benefits

The Canada Border Services Agency benefits by receiving necessary resources and access to enforce customs regulations effectively.

The tradeoff

Transportation facility operators bear the cost of providing facilities free of charge, which may impact their operational expenses and profitability.

Canada Border Services Agencytransportation facility operatorsgoods exporters

Amends: Customs Act

Read the actual text (5)
Customs facilities

2(1) The portion of subsection 6(1) of the Customs Act before paragraph (a) is replaced by the following: 6 (1) The owner or operator of any of the following bridges, tunnels, railways, airports, wharves or docks must provide, equip and maintain free of charge — at or near the bridge, tunnel, railway, airport, wharf or dock — adequate buildings, accommodation or other facilities for carrying out any purpose related to the administration or enforcement of program legislation , as defined in section 2 of the Canada Border Services Agency Act :

3The heading of Part V of the Act is replaced by the following: Exportation

Officer’s access to goods — transportation

4The Act is amended by adding the following after section 97: 97.01 Every person who transports or causes to be transported within Canada goods destined for export must, at an officer’s request, give the officer free access to any premises or place under the person’s control that is attached to or forms part of any place where any goods destined for export are reported, loaded, unloaded or stored and open any package or container of those goods or remove any packaging from those goods.

Officer’s access to goods — warehouses

97.02The operator of a sufferance warehouse or a bonded warehouse must, at an officer’s request, give the officer free access to the warehouse or any premises or place under the operator’s control that is attached to or forms part of the warehouse and open any package or container of goods destined for export or remove any packaging from those goods.

No action against owners or operators

5(1) No action or judicial proceeding by His Majesty in right of Canada lies against any owner or operator referred to in subsection 6(1) of the Customs Act for the reimbursement of any sum that His Majesty paid to the owner or operator with respect to buildings, accommodations or other facilities that were used, before the day on which section 2 comes into force, for carrying out any purpose related to the administration and enforcement of program legislation , as defined in section 2 of the Canada Border Services Agency Act , including the proper detention and examination of goods or the proper search of persons. No action against His Majesty (2) No action or judicial proceeding by an owner or operator referred to in subsection 6(1) of the Customs Act lies against His Majesty in right of Canada for the reimbursement of any cost incurred with respect to buildings, accommodations or other facilities that the owner or operator provided, equipped or maintained free of charge in accordance with that subsection, as it read before the day on which section 2 comes into force, and that were used, before that day, for carrying out any purpose related to the administration and enforcement of program legislation , as defined in section 2 of the Canada Border Services Agency Act . Pending action or judicial proceeding (3) Subsections (1) and (2) apply in respect of any action or judicial proceeding that is pending on the day on which this section comes into force.

PART 2Amendments to drug scheduling definitions
What it does

This part of the bill updates certain definitions related to controlled substances and precursors in the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, allowing the Minister to modify schedules of substances and introducing new oversight regarding drug precursors.

Why it matters

These changes may affect how drugs are classified and regulated, influencing law enforcement and public health policies. They can have significant implications for drug enforcement, access, and public safety.

The problem it addresses

This part addresses the need for more flexible and responsive regulations concerning the classification of drugs and precursors as new substances emerge.

Who benefits

The government and law enforcement agencies benefit from streamlined processes for adjusting drug classifications, potentially making it easier to control emerging substances.

The tradeoff

The increased power granted to the Minister to alter classifications may reduce public transparency and oversight, which could affect how communities engage with drug policies and possibly infringe on individual rights regarding substance access.

GovernmentLaw enforcementDrug manufacturersPublic health organizationsIndividuals dependent on substances

Amends: Controlled Drugs and Substances Act

Read the actual text (16)

6The definitions controlled substance and precursor in subsection 2(1) of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act are replaced by the following: controlled substance means a substance included in any of Schedules I to IV or in Part 1 of Schedule V; ( substance désignée ) precursor means a substance included in Part 2 of Schedule V or in Schedule VI; ( précurseur )

7Paragraph 55(1)(u) of the Act is repealed.

Relevant information

8Section 60.1 of the Act is amended by adding the following after subsection (2): (3) In making an order under subsection (1) or (2), the Minister may take into account any relevant information provided by the Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness. Deletion of item or portion of item (4) An item or portion of an item is deleted from Schedule V on the earliest of (a) the day specified in an order made under subsection (2) in relation to that item or portion of an item, (b) the beginning of the day on which that item or portion of an item is added to any of Schedules I to IV and VI, and (c) the end of the period set out for the item in question.

Amending schedules to regulations

9The Act is amended by adding the following after section 60.1: 60.2 The Governor in Council may make regulations authorizing the Minister (a) to add to or delete from, by order, any schedule to a regulation made under this Act any substance included in Schedule V to this Act; and (b) to make, by order, any other amendment to a schedule to a regulation made under this Act that is consequential or related to an addition or deletion referred to in paragraph (a).

10Schedule V to the Act is replaced by the Schedule V set out in the schedule to this Act.

11The Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (Police Enforcement) Regulations are amended by replacing “in Schedule I, II, III or IV of the Act” with “in any of Schedules I to V to the Act” in the following provisions: (a) the portion of section 5.1 before paragraph (a); and (b) the portion of section 5.2 before paragraph (a).

12The definitions Class A precursor and Class B precursor in section 1 of the Precursor Control Regulations are replaced by the following: Class A precursor means any of the following precursors : (a) a precursor included in Table 1 of Part 2 of Schedule V to the Act; (b) a preparation or mixture included in Table 3 of Part 2 of Schedule V to the Act that contains a precursor included in Table 1 of Part 2 of that Schedule; (c) a precursor included in Part 1 of Schedule VI to the Act; (d) a preparation or mixture included in Part 3 of Schedule VI to the Act that contains a precursor included in Part 1 of that Schedule . ( précurseur de catégorie A ) Class B precursor means any of the following precursors : (a) a precursor included in Table 2 of Part 2 of Schedule V to the Act; (b) a preparation or mixture included in Table 3 of Part 2 of Schedule V to the Act that contains a precursor included in Table 2 of Part 2 of that Schedule; (c) a precursor included in Part 2 of Schedule VI to the Act; (d) a preparation or mixture included in Part 3 of Schedule VI to the Act that contains a precursor included in Part 2 of that Schedule . ( précurseur de catégorie B )

13The Regulations are amended by adding the following after section 91: Temporarily Scheduled Precursors 91.01 (1) The Minister may, by order, add to the schedule a temporarily scheduled precursor and the maximum quantity for it that the Minister considers appropriate. (2) The Minister may, by order, delete from the schedule any item for which a temporarily scheduled precursor is set out or any portion of such an item. (3) An item of the schedule to these Regulations for which a temporarily scheduled precursor is set out, or any portion of such an item, is deleted from that schedule on the day on which the corresponding item or portion of an item is deleted from Schedule V to the Act. (4) In this section, temporarily scheduled precursor means a precursor set out in column 1 of Table 1 or 2 of Part 2 of Schedule V to the Act.

14The schedule to the Regulations is amended by replacing the references after the heading “SCHEDULE” with the following: (Paragraph 5(b), section 8, subsection 9(1.1), section 91.01, subsection 91.3(1), section 91.9, subsection 91.92(1), paragraph 91.96(c) and section 92)

15The heading of column 1 of the schedule to the Regulations is replaced by “Substance”.

16The schedule to the Regulations is amended by adding the following after item 33: Column 1 Column 2 Item Substance Maximum Quantity (expressed as an absolute amount or per package) 34 Phenethyl bromide ((2-bromoethyl)benzene) 0 35 Propionic anhydride (propanoic anhydride) 0

17The Regulations are amended by replacing “in Part 1 of Schedule VI” with “in Table 1 of Part 2 of Schedule V or in Part 1 of Schedule VI” in the following provisions: (a) subsection 8(2); (b) subparagraph 14(1)(b)(iii); (c) subparagraphs 25(1)(c)(iii) and (iv); (d) paragraph 28.1(1)(e); (e) subparagraphs 32(1)(c)(iii) and (iv); (f) paragraph 35.1(1)(e); (g) subparagraphs 39(1)(d)(iii) and (iv); (h) subparagraphs 47(2)(a)(ii) and (4)(d)(ii); (i) subparagraph 48(1)(c)(iii) and paragraph 48(1)(d); (j) section 50; (k) paragraph 54(a); (l) subparagraph 85(1)(a)(iii) and paragraph 85(1)(c); and (m) subparagraphs 91(3)(d)(iii) and (iv).

18The Regulations are amended by replacing “in Part 2 of Schedule VI” with “in Table 2 of Part 2 of Schedule V or in Part 2 of Schedule VI” in the following provisions: (a) section 55; (b) subparagraph 60(1)(c)(ii); (c) subparagraphs 69(1)(c)(ii) and (iii); (d) paragraph 72.1(1)(e); (e) subparagraph 76(1)(c)(iii) and paragraph 76(1)(d); (f) section 78; (g) paragraph 82(a); and (h) subparagraph 85(4)(a)(ii).

19The Regulations are amended by replacing “in Parts 1 or 2 of Schedule VI” with “in Table 1 or 2 of Part 2 of Schedule V or in Part 1 or 2 of Schedule VI” in the following provisions: (a) paragraph 86(2)(b) and subparagraph 86(3)(c)(iii); and (b) subparagraphs 91(1)(d)(iii) and (iv).

SOR/2025-64

20The Order Amending Schedule V to the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (Fentanyl Precursors and Carisoprodol) is repealed.

SOR/2025-64

21(1) The following definitions apply in this section. Order means the Order Amending Schedule V to the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (Fentanyl Precursors and Carisoprodol) . ( arrêté ) other Act means the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act . ( autre loi ) (2) If section 2 of the Order comes into force before section 10 of this Act, then item 1 of Part 1 of Schedule V to the other Act is deleted from that Schedule V at the beginning of the day on which that section 10 comes into force. (3) If section 2 of the Order comes into force on the same day as section 10 of this Act, then that section 2 is deemed not to have come into force and item 1 of Part 1 of Schedule V to the other Act is deleted from that Schedule V. (4) If section 3 of the Order comes into force before section 10 of this Act, then item 1 of Table 1 and item 1 of Table 3 of Part 2 of Schedule V to the other Act are deleted from that Schedule V at the beginning of the day on which that section 10 comes into force. (5) If section 3 of the Order comes into force on the same day as section 10 of this Act, then that section 3 is deemed not to have come into force and item 1 of Table 1 and item 1 of Table 3 of Part 2 of Schedule V to the other Act are deleted from that Schedule V. (6) If section 4 of the Order comes into force before section 10 of this Act, then item 2 of Table 1 and item 2 of Table 3 of Part 2 of Schedule V to the other Act are deleted from that Schedule V at the beginning of the day on which that section 10 comes into force. (7) If section 4 of the Order comes into force on the same day as section 10 of this Act, then that section 4 is deemed not to have come into force and item 2 of Table 1 and item 2 of Table 3 of Part 2 of Schedule V to the other Act are deleted from that Schedule V. (8) If section 5 of the Order comes into force before section 10 of this Act, then item 1 of Table 2 and item 3 of Table 3 of Part 2 of Schedule V to the other Act are deleted from that Schedule V at the beginning of the day on which that section 10 comes into force. (9) If section 5 of the Order comes into force on the same day as section 10 of this Act, then that section 5 is deemed not to have come into force and item 1 of Table 2 and item 3 of Table 3 of Part 2 of Schedule V to the other Act are deleted from that Schedule V.

PART 3Police exemption from drug-related offences
What it does

This part allows police and military police to be exempt from certain Criminal Code offences related to drug conspiracy and attempt while conducting lawful investigations. It confirms that specific regulations can provide these exemptions.

Why it matters

This matters because it clarifies the legal protections for law enforcement during drug investigations, potentially allowing them to operate more effectively. However, it raises concerns about accountability and the potential for abuse of power in drug enforcement.

The problem it addresses

The provision is intended to address the need for law enforcement to perform their duties without the risk of criminal charges under the Criminal Code for actions taken during investigations.

Who benefits

Law enforcement agencies benefit by having greater flexibility in conducting drug-related investigations without the fear of facing charges.

The tradeoff

The tradeoff involves a reduction in safeguards against abuse of power, as it permits police officers to act without the same legal scrutiny that applies to ordinary citizens, potentially undermining accountability.

law enforcement officersmilitary policedrug offendersthe publiclegal accountability advocates

Amends: Police Enforcement of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act and the Cannabis Act

Read the actual text (3)

22(1) Subsection 55(2) of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act is amended by adding the following after paragraph (b): (b.1) exempting, on any terms and conditions that are specified in the regulations, a member of a police force or of the military police that has been designated under paragraph (a), and other persons acting under the direction and control of the member, from the application of any provision of the Criminal Code that creates the offence of conspiracy or attempt to commit, being an accessory after the fact in relation to, or counselling in relation to, an offence under this Act; (2) Subsection 55(2.1) of the Act is amended by adding the following after paragraph (b): (b.1) exempting, on any terms and conditions that are specified in the regulations, a member of a police force or of the military police that has been designated under paragraph (a), and other persons acting under the direction and control of the member, from the application of any provision of the Criminal Code that creates the offence of conspiracy or attempt to commit, being an accessory after the fact in relation to, or counselling in relation to, an offence under this Act;

23(1) Subsection 139(6) of the Cannabis Act is amended by adding the following after paragraph (b): (b.1) exempting, on any terms and conditions that are specified in the regulations, a member of a police force or of the military police that has been designated under paragraph (a), and other persons acting under the direction and control of the member, from the application of any provision of the Criminal Code that creates the offence of conspiracy or attempt to commit, being an accessory after the fact in relation to, or counselling in relation to, an offence under this Act; (2) Subsection 139(7) of the Act is amended by adding the following after paragraph (b): (b.1) exempting, on any terms and conditions that are specified in the regulations, a member of a police force or of the military police that has been designated under paragraph (a), and other persons acting under the direction and control of the member, from the application of any provision of the Criminal Code that creates the offence of conspiracy or attempt to commit, being an accessory after the fact in relation to, or counselling in relation to, an offence under this Act;

Confirmation

24The validity of any of the provisions of the following regulations respecting conspiracy or attempt to commit, being an accessory after the fact in relation to, or counselling in relation to, an offence is confirmed as of the day on which those regulations were made and the effects produced by those provisions since the day on which they came into force are also confirmed: (a) the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (Police Enforcement) Regulations , made on April 22, 1997 and registered as SOR/97-234; (b) the Cannabis Act (Police Enforcement) Regulations , made on June 26, 2018 and registered as SOR/2018-151; and (c) any regulations, made before the day on which this Act receives royal assent, amending one or both of those Regulations.

PART 4Coast guard services and security amendments
What it does

This part of the bill amends the Oceans Act to expand the responsibilities of coast guard services to include security activities and allows the responsible minister to collect, analyze, and disclose information related to security.

Why it matters

This matters because it may enhance national security and improve the effectiveness of coast guard operations in Canada. However, it also raises concerns about privacy and the extent of government data collection.

The problem it addresses

The amendment addresses the need for integrating security functions within the coast guard's operations.

Who benefits

The government and security agencies benefit by strengthening maritime security and enhancing cooperation among various departments and agencies.

The tradeoff

The most significant tradeoff is the potential infringement on privacy as government entities may have increased access to personal information without clear oversight, impacting citizens' rights and freedom.

Government agenciesMaritime workersCoast guard personnelPrivacy advocatesGeneral public

Amends: Oceans Act

Read the actual text (3)
Coast guard services

25(1) The portion of subsection 41(1) of the Oceans Act before paragraph (a) is replaced by the following: 41 (1) The Minister, or any other member of the King’s Privy Council for Canada designated by the Governor in Council for the purposes of this section, is responsible for coast guard services and their powers, duties and functions extend to and include all matters over which Parliament has jurisdiction, not assigned by law to any other department, board or agency of the Government of Canada, relating to

Powers with respect to information and intelligence

26The Act is amended by adding the following after section 41: 41.1 In exercising the powers and performing the duties and functions assigned to them under section 41, the Minister, or any other member of the King’s Privy Council for Canada designated under subsection 41(1), may collect, analyze and disclose information or intelligence.

Day after royal assent

27This Part comes into force on the day after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.

PART 5Information sharing in immigration matters
What it does

This part allows the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration to share personal information within their department and with other federal and provincial entities for specific administrative and enforcement purposes. It regulates the conditions under which this information can be shared and prohibits its disclosure to foreign entities without consent.

Why it matters

This is important for facilitating government operations related to immigration and ensuring that personal information is handled consistently and securely, which affects individuals seeking immigration services. The public needs to understand how their personal data may be shared and with whom.

The problem it addresses

This aims to clarify and streamline the processes of sharing personal information related to immigration while providing safeguards against misuse.

Who benefits

Government agencies benefit by obtaining better access to relevant data, facilitating cooperation and efficiency in immigration enforcement and administration.

The tradeoff

The tradeoff involves a potential erosion of individual privacy as personal information may be disclosed more widely among government bodies, which may lead to concerns about surveillance and the misuse of data.

immigrantsrefugeesDepartment of Citizenship and Immigrationfederal government agenciesprovincial government agencies

Amends: Information Sharing — Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship

Read the actual text (6)
Definition of personal information

28The Department of Citizenship and Immigration Act is amended by adding the following after section 5.2: Disclosure of Personal Information 5.3 In sections 5.4 to 5.7 , personal information has the same meaning as in section 3 of the Privacy Act .

Disclosure within Department

5.4Subject to any regulations made under section 5.7 , the Minister may, for the purpose of exercising their powers or performing their duties or functions under an Act of Parliament or another lawful authority, disclose within the Department any personal information under the control of the Department.

Disclosure outside Department

5.5(1) Subject to any regulations made under section 5.7 , and under a written agreement or arrangement that includes the elements of personal information that may be disclosed, the purpose of disclosure, any limits on secondary use and subsequent transfer of personal information and any other relevant details, the Minister may, for the purpose of the administration or enforcement of an Act of Parliament or of the legislature of a province or for the purpose of exercising their powers or performing their duties or functions under another lawful authority, disclose to any department, ministry, body, office or agency of the federal government or of a provincial government or to a federal or provincial Crown corporation personal information that is under the control of the Department and that relates to any of the following: (a) the identity of an individual and any changes to their identity; (b) the status of an individual in Canada and any changes to their status; (c) the contents or status of any document issued to an individual by the Minister under a provision for which the Minister is responsible in an Act of Parliament or under another lawful authority, including information relating to the issuance, provision, renewal, restoration, validity, variance, withholding, refusal, termination, cancellation, correction, revocation, recall, suspension, recovery or loss of such a document. Prohibition (2) It is prohibited for a department, ministry, body, office or agency of a provincial government or a provincial Crown corporation to disclose personal information that it receives under subsection (1) to a foreign entity unless the disclosure is done (a) with the written consent of the Minister; and (b) in a manner that respects Canada’s international obligations in respect of mistreatment , as defined in section 2 of the Avoiding Complicity in Mistreatment by Foreign Entities Act .

Other disclosure authorities

5.6For greater certainty, nothing in this Act affects any authority to disclose personal information under another Act of Parliament, at common law or under the royal prerogative.

Regulations

5.7For the purposes of sections 5.4 and 5.5 , the Governor in Council may make regulations respecting (a) the disclosure of personal information under the control of the Department, including conditions for or limits on disclosure and the specification of purposes for disclosure; and (b) the meaning of terms used in those sections.

29Subsection 150.1(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act is amended by striking out “and” at the end of paragraph (d), by adding “and” at the end of paragraph (e) and by adding the following after paragraph (e): (f) the disclosure, for the purposes of cooperation, of information collected for the purposes of this Act to federal departments and agencies, including personal information disclosed under a written agreement or arrangement that includes the elements of personal information that may be disclosed, the purpose of disclosure, any limits on secondary use and subsequent transfer of personal information and any other relevant details.

PART 6Changes to Asylum Claim Procedures
What it does

This part amends the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act to remove certain designations, clarify requirements for refugee claims, and establish guidelines for representation of vulnerable applicants. It also sets conditions under which the Minister can declare claims abandoned or withdrawn.

Why it matters

These changes affect how asylum seekers can navigate the Canadian refugee system, impacting their ability to find safety in Canada. Streamlined processes could lead to faster resolutions of claims, but also raise concerns about due process for individuals in vulnerable situations.

The problem it addresses

The current process for asylum claims can be complex and may leave vulnerable individuals without proper support or representation.

Who benefits

Asylum seekers, particularly minors and those unable to fully understand the legal processes, gain access to designated representatives for their claims.

The tradeoff

The cost of these amendments may shift additional burdens onto asylum seekers who must comply with stricter deadlines and documentation requirements, potentially disadvantaging those who are less able to navigate the system's complexities.

asylum seekersMinister of Citizenship and ImmigrationRefugee Protection Divisionlegal representativesvulnerable individuals

Amends: Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (In-Canada Asylum System)

Read the actual text (36)

30Subsection 2(1) of the English version of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act is amended by adding the following in alphabetical order: prescribed means prescribed by regulation. ( Version anglaise seulement )

Representation

31The Act is amended by adding the following after section 6: 6.1 (1) The Minister must, in the prescribed circumstances, designate a person to represent a person who is the subject of a prescribed proceeding or application if the person who is the subject of the proceeding or application is under 18 years of age or is unable, in the opinion of the Minister, to appreciate the nature of the proceeding or application. That obligation does not apply in respect of a proceeding before a Division of the Board. Personal information (2) The Minister may disclose the personal information of the person who is the subject of the proceeding or application to the representative. Regulations (3) The regulations may provide for any matter relating to the application of this section, may prescribe the circumstances in which, and the proceedings and applications for which, a representative must be designated and may include provisions respecting (a) the responsibilities of a representative and the requirements that must be met to be designated as a representative; (b) the circumstances in which a representative may make decisions on behalf of the person they represent; and (c) the remuneration of a representative.

Non-application of instructions

32Subsection 14.1(6) of the English version of the Act is replaced by the following: (6) The instructions do not apply in respect of a prescribed class.

Autorisation d’entrer : contrôle complémentaire ou enquête

33Section 23 of the French version of the Act is replaced by the following: 23 L’ agent peut autoriser une personne à entrer au Canada en vue du contrôle complémentaire ou de l’enquête prévus par la présente partie.

34Subsection 24(4) of the Act is amended by striking out “or” at the end of paragraph (a) and by adding the following after that paragraph: (a.1) the day on which their claim was determined by the Minister to be withdrawn, in the case where no application was made to the Federal Court for leave to commence an application for judicial review; (a.2) in any other case where their claim was determined by the Minister to be withdrawn, the later of (i) the day on which the Minister made the determination or, if there was more than one such determination, the day on which the last one occurred, and (ii) the day on which the Federal Court refused their application for leave to commence an application for judicial review, or denied their application for judicial review, with respect to the Minister’s determination; or

35Paragraph 25(1.2)(b) of the Act is replaced by the following: (b) the foreign national has made a claim for refugee protection that has been determined to be eligible to be referred to the Refugee Protection Division or that is pending before that Division or the Refugee Appeal Division;

36Paragraph 38(2)(d) of the English version of the Act is replaced by the following: (d) is, if prescribed, the spouse, common-law partner, child or other family member of a foreign national referred to in any of paragraphs (a) to (c).

Referral or removal order

37Subsection 44(2) of the English version of the Act is replaced by the following: (2) If the Minister is of the opinion that the report is well-founded, the Minister may refer the report to the Immigration Division for an admissibility hearing, except in the case of a permanent resident who is inadmissible solely on the grounds that they have failed to comply with the residency obligation under section 28 and except, in the case of a foreign national, in the prescribed circumstances. In those cases, the Minister may make a removal order.

Presence in Canada

38The Act is amended by adding the following before section 45: 44.1 The Immigration Division must not hold an admissibility hearing if the permanent resident or foreign national who is the subject of the hearing is not physically present in Canada.

In force

39(1) Subsection 49(1) of the English version of the Act is replaced by the following: 49 (1) A removal order comes into force on (a) the day on which it is made, if there is no right to appeal; (b) the day after the day on which the appeal period expires, if there is a right to appeal and no appeal is made; or (c) the day on which a final determination is made that has the effect of confirming the removal order , if an appeal is made.

Person in need of protection

40Subsection 97(2) of the English version of the Act is replaced by the following: (2) A person in Canada who is a member of a class of persons that is prescribed as being in need of protection is also a person in need of protection.

41Subsection 99(3.1) of the Act is repealed.

42The heading before section 100 of the Act is replaced by the following: Consideration of Claims Prior to Referral

Consideration of claims

43(1) Subsection 100(1) of the Act is replaced by the following: 100 (1) An officer must , after receiving a claim referred to in subsection 99(3), determine whether it is eligible to be referred to the Refugee Protection Division. If it is determined to be eligible, the Minister must consider it further within the prescribed time limit.

Referral of claims

44The Act is amended by adding the following after section 100: 100.1 (1) Subject to subsections 100(1) to (3) and section 102.2, the Minister must refer a claim for refugee protection to the Refugee Protection Division if (a) the claim has been determined to be eligible for referral; (b) the Minister has been provided with, and has had the opportunity to consider, the documents and information referred to in subsection 100(4); and (c) in the case where the person who made the claim has been requested to appear for an examination, they have appeared for the examination. Restriction (2) The Refugee Protection Division is not authorized to consider a claim for the purposes of subsection 107(1) until the claim has been referred to it under subsection (1).

Abandoned claims

45The Act is amended by adding the following after section 102: Abandonment and Withdrawal of Claims 102.1 (1) If a person who makes a claim for refugee protection inside Canada that has not been referred to the Refugee Protection Division and that has not been determined to be ineligible for referral fails to provide documents or information in accordance with subsection 100(4) or fails to appear for an examination when requested to do so, the Minister must transmit the claim to the Division to determine whether, as a result of the failure, the claim has been abandoned. Determination (2) Subject to subsection (6), the Refugee Protection Division must — after, among other things, providing the person with the opportunity to make representations — determine, in accordance with subsection 168(1), whether the claim has been abandoned. Limit (3) Despite section 165, the Refugee Protection Division cannot compel the Minister, an officer or any other person who is authorized to act on the Minister’s behalf to appear for a hearing. Requirements (4) If the Refugee Protection Division determines that the claim has not been abandoned, the person who made the claim must provide the necessary documents or information or appear for the examination, as the case may be, in accordance with the requirements imposed by or under the regulations. Failure to comply (5) If the person who made the claim is required to comply with subsection (4) and fails to do so, the Refugee Protection Division must make a new determination under subsection (2). Termination (6) A proceeding under this section is terminated if (a) the person who made the claim provides the Minister with the necessary documents and information or appears for the examination, as the case may be; (b) the claim is determined under subsection 100(1) or (3) to be ineligible to be referred to the Refugee Protection Division; or (c) a prescribed circumstance exists.

Withdrawal of claims

102.2(1) The Minister may, at any time after a claim for refugee protection is determined to be eligible for referral and before the claim is referred to the Refugee Protection Division, determine that the claim has been withdrawn if the claimant provides the Minister with written notice of withdrawal. Reinstatement of claim (2) Subject to the regulations, the Minister may, on application, reinstate a claim that the Minister has determined to be withdrawn.

46Paragraph 104(1)(c) of the English version of the Act is replaced by the following: (c) the claim was referred as a result of the direct or indirect misrepresentation or withholding of material facts relating to a relevant matter and was not otherwise eligible to be referred to the Refugee Protection Division; or

Presence in Canada

47The Act is amended by adding the following after section 104: 104.1 (1) The Refugee Protection Division must not commence, or must suspend, consideration of a claim for refugee protection for the purposes of subsection 107(1) if the claimant is not physically present in Canada. Refugee Appeal Division (2) The Refugee Appeal Division must not commence, or must suspend, consideration of an appeal, other than an appeal by the Minister, if the person who is the subject of the appeal is not physically present in Canada.

48Section 109.1 of the Act and the heading before it are repealed.

Procedure

49(1) Paragraph 110(2)(d.1) of the Act is repealed. (2) Subsections 110(3) and (3.1) of the Act are replaced by the following: (3) Subject to subsections (4) and (6), the Refugee Appeal Division must proceed without a hearing, on the basis of the record of the proceedings of the Refugee Protection Division, and may accept documentary evidence and written submissions from the Minister and the person who is the subject of the appeal and, in the case of a matter that is conducted before a panel of three members, written submissions from a representative or agent or mandatary of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees and any other person described in the rules of the Board.

Confirmation of rejection

50Section 111 of the Act is amended by adding the following after subsection (2): (3) If the Refugee Appeal Division confirms a decision of the Refugee Protection Division to reject a claim for refugee protection, the decision of the Refugee Appeal Division is itself a decision to reject the claim.

51(1) Paragraph 111.1(1)(a) of the Act is replaced by the following: (a) time limits for providing documents and information under subsection 100(4) and the extension of those time limits, including extensions by the Minister ; (2) Subsection 111.1(1) is amended by adding the following after paragraph (a): (a.1) time limits for the Minister to consider claims under subsection 100(1); (3) Paragraph 111.1(1)(b) of the Act is repealed. (4) Subsection 111.1(1) of the Act is amended by adding “and” at the end of paragraph (c), by striking out “and” at the end of paragraph (d) and by repealing paragraph (e). (5) Subsection 111.1(2) of the Act is repealed.

Exemption

52(1) The portion of paragraph 112(2)(b.1) of the Act before subparagraph (i) is replaced by the following: (b.1) subject to subsection (2.1), less than 12 months have passed since (2) Subsection 112(2) of the Act is amended by striking out “or” at the end of paragraph (b.1) and by adding the following after that paragraph: (b.2) subject to subsection (2.1), less than 12 months have passed since (i) the day on which their claim for refugee protection was determined by the Minister to be withdrawn, in the case where no application was made to the Federal Court for leave to commence an application for judicial review, or (ii) in any other case where their claim for refugee protection was determined by the Minister to be withdrawn, the later of (A) the day on which the Minister made the determination or, if there was more than one such determination, the day on which the last determination occurred, and (B) the day on which the Federal Court refused their application for leave to commence an application for judicial review, or denied their application for judicial review, with respect to the Minister’s determination; or (3) The portion of paragraph 112(2)(c) of the Act before subparagraph (i) is replaced by the following: (c) subject to subsection (2.1), less than 12 months have passed since (4) The portion of subsection 112(2.1) of the Act before paragraph (a) is replaced by the following: (2.1) The Minister may exempt from the application of paragraph (2)(b.1), (b.2) or (c)

Prosecution of designated offences

53Subsection 144(1) of the English version of the Act is replaced by the following: 144 (1) In addition to other procedures set out in this Act or in the Criminal Code for commencing a proceeding, proceedings in respect of any prescribed offence may be commenced in accordance with this section.

54Paragraph 159(1)(g) of the Act is replaced by the following: (g) takes any action that may be necessary to ensure that the members of the Board carry out their duties efficiently and without undue delay, including by specifying the manner in which decisions must be rendered and reasons for decisions must be given ;

55(1) Paragraph 161(1)(a.1) of the Act is repealed. (2) Subsection 161(1.1) of the Act is repealed.

Clarification

56Section 168 of the Act is amended by adding the following after subsection (1): (1.1) For greater certainty, if the Refugee Protection Division or the Refugee Appeal Division is prevented under section 104.1 from considering a claim or appeal, it may determine under subsection (1) that the claim or appeal has been abandoned.

57Paragraph 169(e) of the English version of the Act is replaced by the following: (e) written reasons for the decision must be provided to the person who is the subject of the decision and to the Minister in circumstances provided for in the rules of the Board or if the person or the Minister requests them within 10 days after notice of the decision is provided ; and

58(1) Paragraph 170(d) of the Act is repealed. (2) Paragraph 170(f) of the Act is replaced by the following: (f) may, despite paragraph (b), accept a claim for refugee protection without a hearing if the Minister has not notified the Division of the Minister’s intention to intervene;

Definition of Act

59(1) In this section and sections 60 to 62 , Act means the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act . Words and expressions (2) Unless the context requires otherwise, words and expressions used in sections 60 to 62 have the same meaning as in the Act.

Section 6.1 of the Act

60Section 6.1 of the Act applies to any proceedings or applications that are prescribed for the purposes of subsection 6.1(1) of the Act and that are pending or in progress on the day on which the regulations that prescribe those proceedings or applications come into force.

Section 44.1 of the Act

61Section 44.1 of the Act applies to hearings before the Immigration Division that have not yet been completed on the day on which section 38 comes into force.

Pending claims for refugee protection

62Each provision that is set out below applies in respect of claims for refugee protection whose eligibility to be referred to the Refugee Protection Division has not yet been determined on the day on which the provision comes into force or that have been determined to be eligible for referral but have not yet been referred to that Division on that day: (a) subsection 100(1) of the Act, as enacted by subsection 43 (1); (b) the portion of subsection 100(2) of the Act before paragraph (a), as enacted by subsection 43 (2); (c) paragraph 100(2)(b) of the Act, as enacted by subsection 43 (3); (d) subsection 100(3) of the Act, as enacted by subsection 43 (4); (e) subsection 100(4) of the Act, as enacted by subsection 43 (5); (f) section 100.1 of the Act; and (g) sections 102.1 and 102.2 of the Act.

2023, c. 26

63(1) If section 41 of this Act comes into force before the day on which subsection 284(2) of the Budget Implementation Act, 2023, No. 1 comes into force, then that subsection 284(2) is repealed. (2) If section 41 of this Act and subsection 284(2) of the Budget Implementation Act, 2023, No. 1 come into force on the same day, then that subsection 284(2) is deemed never to have come into force and is repealed.

Order in council

64(1) Subject to subsection (2), the provisions of this Part, other than sections 30 , 32 , 33 , 36 to 40 , 46 , 47 , 50 , 53 , 54 , 56 , 57 and 59 to 63 , come into force on a day or days to be fixed by order of the Governor in Council. Order in council (2) Section 45 comes into force on a day to be fixed by order of the Governor in Council but that day must not be before the day on which subsection 43 (5) comes into force.

PART 7Governor in Council powers over immigration applications
What it does

This part of the bill gives the Governor in Council the authority to suspend, terminate, or refuse the processing of certain immigration applications and to cancel or modify related documents if deemed necessary for public interest. It also requires individuals to provide truthful information and appear for examinations when requested.

Why it matters

This matters because it expands the government's ability to manage immigration processes and improve national security or public safety concerns. However, it could lead to delays or denials of applications for individuals seeking residency or entry to Canada.

The problem it addresses

The provisions aim to address potential risks by allowing swift action on immigration applications that may not align with public interest.

Who benefits

The government gains more control over immigration policies and processes, potentially enhancing public safety.

The tradeoff

The most significant tradeoff is that foreign nationals seeking immigration may face uncertainty and risk losing their application progress or documents, while the government's increased authority could lead to perceptions of arbitrary decision-making.

foreign nationalsimmigration applicantsgovernment officerslaw enforcement agenciespublic safety officials

Amends: Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (Certain Measures in Respect of Applications and Documents)

Read the actual text (13)
Termination — processing of application

65The Immigration and Refugee Protection Act is amended by adding the following after section 11.2: 11.3 An officer may terminate the processing of an application for a visa or other document in the prescribed circumstances.

66Subsection 14(2) of the Act is amended by adding the following after paragraph (b): (b.1) the circumstances in which an officer may terminate the processing of an application for a visa or other document;

Document — cancellation, suspension or variation

67The Act is amended by adding the following after section 20: 20.01 (1) An officer may, in the prescribed circumstances, cancel, suspend or vary a visa or other document. For greater certainty (2) For greater certainty, subsection (1) does not affect any other lawful authority to cancel, suspend or vary a visa or other document.

Permis de séjour temporaire

68Subsection 24(1) of the French version of the Act is replaced by the following: 24 (1) Devient résident temporaire l’étranger, dont l’agent estime qu’il est interdit de territoire ou ne se conforme pas à la présente loi, à qui il délivre, s’il estime que les circonstances le justifient, un permis de séjour temporaire — titre annulable en tout temps.

69Subsection 26(1) of the Act is amended by adding the following after paragraph (b): (b.01) the circumstances in which an officer may cancel, suspend or vary a visa or other document;

Obligation — answer truthfully

70The Act is amended by adding the following after section 32: DIVISION 3.1 Examination — Foreign Nationals 32.1 (1) A foreign national who is outside Canada and who holds a permanent resident visa, temporary resident visa, electronic travel authorization, temporary resident permit or any other document must, in order to confirm that they meet the requirements of this Act in respect of that document and in the prescribed circumstances, answer truthfully all questions put to them by an officer and must produce a visa and all relevant evidence and documents that the officer reasonably requires. Obligation — appear for examination (2) A foreign national who is outside Canada and who holds a document referred to in subsection (1) must, in order to confirm that they meet the requirements of this Act in respect of that document and in the prescribed circumstances, appear for an examination, including a medical examination, on request of an officer. For greater certainty (3) For greater certainty, subsections (1) and (2) do not affect any other lawful authority relating to the conduct of an examination of foreign nationals.

Regulations

32.2The regulations may prescribe the circumstances in which a foreign national who is outside Canada and who holds a document referred to in subsection 32.1(1) must appear for examination, answer truthfully all questions put to them and produce a visa and all relevant evidence and documents.

71Paragraph 47(c) of the Act is replaced by the following: (c) on cancellation of their temporary resident permit, other than cancellation by an order made under subsection 87.302(1) .

Order in council — applications

72The Act is amended by adding the following after section 87.3: Orders Made in the Public Interest 87.301 (1) The Governor in Council may make an order specifying one or more of the following, if the Governor in Council is of the opinion that it is in the public interest to do so: (a) applications for permanent resident visas, temporary resident visas, electronic travel authorizations, work permits, study permits or any other documents, or any combination of those types of applications, made by foreign nationals are not to be accepted for processing if they are received during the period set out in the order or, if a period is not set out, during the period for which the order is in force; (b) the processing of any such types of applications, or any combination of them, made by foreign nationals that are pending on the coming into force of the order or, if amended, the amendment, is to be suspended during the period set out in the order or, if a period is not set out, during the period for which the order is in force; or (c) the processing of any such types of applications, or any combination of them, made by foreign nationals that are pending on the coming into force of the order or, if amended, the amendment, is to be terminated. Other elements of order (2) An order made under subsection (1) may (a) restrict the application of the order to certain foreign nationals or to applications within a class of applications that is specified in the order; (b) provide for the retention, return or other disposition of applications; (c) specify whether, despite any other Act of Parliament, any fees paid in respect of an application referred to in paragraph (1)(a) or (b) are to be repaid and, if they are, that such a repayment is to be made without interest from the Consolidated Revenue Fund; and (d) provide for any other matter arising out of or ancillary to the exercise of the power conferred under that subsection. Termination — fees repaid (3) An order made under subsection (1) must specify whether, despite any other Act of Parliament, any fees paid in respect of an application referred to in paragraph (1)(c) are to be repaid and, if they are, that the repayment is to be made without interest from the Consolidated Revenue Fund.

Order in council — documents

87.302(1) If the Governor in Council is of the opinion that it is in the public interest to do so, the Governor in Council may, by order, (a) cancel or vary documents, including permanent resident visas, permanent resident cards, temporary resident visas, electronic travel authorizations, temporary resident permits, work permits or study permits; (b) suspend such documents for the period set out in the order or, if a period is not set out, during the period for which the order is in force; (c) impose or vary conditions on such documents — including a condition or requirement imposed under the provision of any other Act of Parliament, or of any regulations or orders made under such an Act, or one related to the compliance with any such provision — for the period set out in the order or, if a period is not set out, during the period for which the order is in force; or (d) impose or vary such conditions on temporary residents for the period set out in the order or, if a period is not set out, during the period for which the order is in force. Recommendation (2) An order made under subsection (1) whose measures concern, in whole or in part, persons inside Canada must be made on the Minister’s recommendation with the concurrence of the Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness. Other elements of order (3) An order made under subsection (1) may (a) restrict the application of the order to certain documents or individuals; (b) provide for the return of documents; and (c) provide for any other matter arising out of or ancillary to the exercise of the power conferred under that subsection.

Amendments by Governor in Council

87.303(1) If the Governor in Council is of the opinion that it is in the public interest to do so, the Governor in Council may, by order, amend or repeal any order made under subsection 87.301(1) or 87.302(1). Amendments by Minister (2) If the Governor in Council is of the opinion that it is in the public interest to do so, the Governor in Council may, by order, authorize the Minister, by order, to amend or repeal any order made under subsection 87.30 1 (1) or 87.302(1), subject to any conditions that the Governor in Council may specify. Concurrence (3) If the amendment or repeal concerns, in whole or in part, persons in Canada, then it requires, (a) in the case of an amendment or repeal made by the Governor in Council, the Minister’s recommendation with the concurrence of the Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness; or (b) in the case of an amendment or repeal made by the Minister, the concurrence of the Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness.

Obligation

87.304(1) A person must answer truthfully all questions put to them by an officer that relate to the application of an order made under subsection 87.302(1) and must produce a visa and all relevant evidence and documents that the officer reasonably requires for the purpose of the application of such an order. Obligation — appear for examination (2) A person must, on request of an officer, appear for an examination — including a medical examination — that relates to the application of an order made under subsection 87.302(1).

Non-application of Statutory Instruments Act

87.305An order made under subsection 87.301(1), 87.302(1) or 87.303(1) or (2), or a ministerial order referred to in subsection 87.303(2), is exempt from the application of sections 3, 5 and 11 of the Statutory Instruments Act and must be published in the Canada Gazette not later than 23 days after the day on which it is made.

PART 8New grounds for refugee protection ineligibility
What it does

This part of the bill adds two new reasons that individuals may be ineligible to claim refugee protection in Canada. It also allows for exceptions to these new rules and includes a transitional provision regarding their retroactive application.

Why it matters

These changes could significantly affect individuals seeking refuge in Canada, potentially limiting their access to protection. The stakes involve balancing national security concerns with humanitarian obligations.

The problem it addresses

This addresses concerns about individuals entering Canada unlawfully or with delays in filing their refugee claims.

Who benefits

The government may benefit by enhancing border security and controlling the flow of refugee claims.

The tradeoff

The most consequential tradeoff involves potential reductions in the rights of some individuals to seek asylum, particularly impacting those who enter outside official ports or who delay their claims, which may undermine their chances of protection.

refugee claimantsimmigration officialsborder security agencieslegal aid providershumanitarian organizations

Amends: Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (Ineligibility)

Read the actual text (3)
Paragraph (1)(b.1) — multiple entries

73(1) Subsection 101(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act is amended by adding the following after paragraph (b): (b.1) the claimant entered Canada after June 24, 2020 and made the claim more than one year after the day of their entry; (b.2) the claimant entered Canada at a location along the Canada–United States land border — including the waters along or across that border — that is not a port of entry and made the claim after the end of the time limit referred to in subsection 159.4(1.1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations ; (2) Section 101 of the Act is amended by adding the following after subsection (1): (1.1) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(b.1), if the claimant has entered Canada more than once after June 24, 2020, the one-year period referred to in that paragraph begins on the day after the day of their first entry.

74Subsection 111.1(1) of the Act is amended by adding the following after paragraph (b): (b.1) exceptions to the application of paragraph 101(1)(b.1); (b.2) exceptions to the application of paragraph 101(1)(b.2);

Paragraphs 101(1)(b.1) and (b.2) and subsection 101(1.1)

75Paragraphs 101(1)(b.1) and (b.2) and subsection 101(1.1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (a) do not apply to a claim for refugee protection made before the day on which Bill C-2, introduced in the 1st session of the 45th Parliament and entitled An Act respecting certain measures relating to the security of the border between Canada and the United States and respecting other related security measures , was introduced; and (b) apply to a claim for refugee protection made during the period beginning on the day on which that Bill was introduced and ending on the day before the day on which this Act receives royal assent.

PART 9Amendments to Money Laundering Act
What it does

This part amends the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act to increase penalties for violations, establish mandatory compliance agreements, and require certain entities to enroll with the Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada.

Why it matters

These changes could enhance the enforcement of regulations against money laundering and terrorist financing, aiming to protect the financial system and public safety. However, they also impose stricter compliance obligations and penalties on businesses and individuals.

The problem it addresses

The amendments address the need for stronger measures and penalties in combating money laundering and financing of terrorism.

Who benefits

The public benefits from potentially enhanced security and integrity in financial transactions as a result of stricter enforcement measures.

The tradeoff

Businesses may face increased compliance costs and risks of severe penalties, which could affect their operations and financial viability, while the government gains more authority to mandate compliance and monitor financial activities.

Businesses in financial servicesFinancial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of CanadaEntities required to enrollIndividuals facing penalties for violationsCommissioner of Canada Elections

Amends: Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act

Read the actual text (71)

76(1) The definition violation in subsection 2(1) of the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act is repealed. (2) Subsection 2(1) of the Act is amended by adding the following in alphabetical order: compliance order violation means a violation referred to in subsection 73.18(1). ( violation d’un ordre de conformité ) prescribed violation means a violation referred to in section 73.13. ( violation réglementaire ) (3) Paragraph 2(2)(d) of the Act is replaced by the following: (d) identifying information , for the purposes of subsection 54.1(3) or 54.2(3) ;

77The heading of Part 1 of the English version of the Act is replaced by the following: Record Keeping, Verifying Identity, Reporting of Suspicious Transactions, Registration and Enrolment

Prohibition — anonymous account or client

78Section 9.2 of the Act is replaced by the following: 9.2 (1) No person or entity referred to in section 5 shall open an anonymous account or an account for an anonymous client. Anonymous client (2) A client is anonymous for the purposes of subsection (1) if the person or entity cannot verify the identity of the client in accordance with the regulations or if the client’s name is obviously fictitious .

Program requirements

79Section 9.6 of the Act is amended by adding the following after subsection (1): (1.1) The person or entity shall ensure that the program is reasonably designed, risk-based and effective.

80The heading “Inscription” before section 11.1 of the French version of the Act is replaced by the following: Inscription — entreprises fournissant des services monétaires

81Paragraph 11.11(1)(e.1) of the Act is replaced by the following: (e.1) a person or entity that, having committed a compliance order violation or a prescribed violation and being liable to a penalty for it, and 30 days having elapsed since the day on which all proceedings in respect of the violation are ended, has still not paid the penalty together with any interest imposed under section 73.28; (e.2) a person or entity that is acting on behalf of or in concert with a person or entity referred to in paragraph (e.1) for the purpose of evading the payment of a penalty; or

Enrolment requirement

82The Act is amended by adding the following after section 11.4: Enrolment 11.4001 (1) Subject to subsection (2), every person or entity referred to in section 5 shall enroll with the Centre. Exceptions (2) Subsection (1) does not apply to a person or entity referred to in paragraph 5(h), (h.1) or (m) or to a person or entity referred to in section 5 that acts exclusively as an employee or agent or mandatary of another person or entity referred to in that section.

Application for enrolment

11.4002If section 11.4001 applies to a person or entity, the person or entity shall submit an application for enrolment to the Centre within the prescribed period. The application shall be made in the prescribed form and manner and include the prescribed information.

Notice of enrolment

11.4003An applicant is enrolled if the Centre adds the applicant to the roll referred to in subsection 54.2(1). The Centre shall, without delay, notify the applicant of their enrolment.

Renewal

11.4004An enrolled person or entity shall renew their enrolment within the prescribed period.

Application for renewal

11.4005An application for renewal of enrolment shall be submitted to the Centre in the prescribed form and manner and shall include the prescribed information.

Notice of renewal

11.4006An applicant for renewal of enrolment remains on the roll referred to in subsection 54.2(1) if the Centre approves the application. The Centre shall, without delay, notify the applicant of the renewal.

Changes to information

11.4007An applicant for enrolment or for renewal of enrolment shall notify the Centre, in the prescribed form and manner, of any change to the information provided in the application or of any newly obtained information that should have been included in the application within 30 days after the day on which the applicant becomes aware of the change or obtains the new information.

Clarifications — applicant

11.4008(1) An applicant for enrolment or for renewal of enrolment shall provide the Centre, in the prescribed form and manner, with any clarifications that the Centre may request in respect of the information described in section 11.4002 or 11.4005 within 30 days after the day on which the request is made. Denial of application (2) If the applicant does not provide the Centre with the clarifications within the period specified in subsection (1), the Centre may deny the application and shall, without delay, notify the applicant of the denial.

Denial of application

11.4009(1) The Centre shall deny an application for enrolment or for renewal of enrolment if (a) the applicant committed a compliance order violation or a prescribed violation, became liable to pay a penalty for it and, 30 days after the day on which all proceedings in respect of the violation ended, has still not paid the penalty together with any interest imposed under section 73.28; or (b) the Centre determines that the applicant is in a prescribed relationship with a person or entity in the situation described in paragraph (a). Notice of denial (2) If an application is denied, the Centre shall, without delay, notify the applicant of the denial.

Clarifications — enrolled person or entity

11.401(1) An enrolled person or entity shall provide the Centre, in the prescribed form and manner, with any clarifications that the Centre may request in respect of the information described in section 11.4002 or 11.4005 within 30 days after the day on which the request is made. Revocation of enrolment (2) If the enrolled person or entity does not provide the Centre with the clarifications within the period specified in subsection (1), the Centre may revoke their enrolment and shall, without delay, notify the person or entity of the revocation.

Revocation of enrolment

11.4011(1) The Centre may revoke the enrolment of an enrolled person or entity if (a) the person or entity committed a compliance order violation or a prescribed violation, became liable to pay a penalty for it and, 30 days after the day on which all proceedings in respect of the violation ended, has still not paid the penalty together with any interest imposed under section 73.28; or (b) the Centre determines that the person or entity is in a prescribed relationship with a person or entity in the situation described in paragraph (a). Notice of revocation (2) If the Centre revokes the enrolment of the person or entity, the Centre shall, without delay, notify the person or entity of the revocation.

Requirement ceases to apply

11.4012(1) If section 11.4001 ceases to apply to an enrolled person or entity, the person or entity shall notify the Centre in the prescribed form and manner within 30 days after the day on which that section ceased to apply. Explanation (2) The notice shall explain why section 11.4001 has ceased to apply to the person or entity. Notice of revocation (3) If the Centre is satisfied that section 11.4001 has ceased to apply to the person or entity, the Centre shall revoke their enrolment and, without delay, notify them of the revocation. Notice of continued enrolment (4) If the Centre is not satisfied that section 11.4001 has ceased to apply to the person or entity, the Centre shall, without delay, notify them of their continued enrolment.

Duty to notify

11.4013If the Centre determines that section 11.4001 applies to a person or entity that is not enrolled, the Centre shall notify that person or entity of the requirement to enroll.

Application for review

11.4014(1) Within 30 days after the day on which a person or entity is notified under subsection 11.4008(2), 11.4009(2), 11.401(2), 11.4011(2) or 11.4012(4) or section 11.4013, the person or entity may apply in writing to the Director of the Centre for a review of the decision in question and may provide any information in support of their application for review. Review by Director (2) The Director shall review the decision as soon as possible and shall take into consideration any information that the Director deems relevant. Decision of Director (3) The Director may either confirm the decision or substitute their own decision, and shall, without delay, serve notice of the review decision with reasons on the person or entity, together with notice of the right of appeal under subsection 11.4015(1).

Appeal to Federal Court

11.4015(1) A person or entity that applied for a review under subsection 11.4014(1) may appeal the Director’s review decision to the Federal Court within 30 days after the day on which the decision is served, or within any longer period that the Court allows. Appeal (2) If the Director does not make a review decision within 90 days after the day on which the Director received the application for review, the applicant may appeal to the Federal Court, within 30 days after the day on which the 90-day period expires, the decision or determination in question. Precautions against disclosure (3) In an appeal, the Court shall take every reasonable precaution, including, when appropriate, conducting hearings in private, to avoid the disclosure by the Court or any person or entity of information referred to in subsection 55(1). However, the Court is not required to take those precautions with respect to the appellant’s name and operating name.

Records

83Subsection 39.02(6) of the Act is replaced by the following: (6) Any person or entity that imports or exports goods or that causes or arranges for goods to be imported or exported — for sale or for any industrial, occupational, commercial, institutional or other like use, or any other use that may be prescribed — or that produces, supplies, distributes, consumes or holds those goods for such a purpose shall keep at the person or entity’s place of business in Canada, or at any other place that the Minister may designate, any records in respect of the goods in any manner and for any period of time that may be prescribed. The person or entity shall, if an officer so requests, make the records available to the officer, within the time specified by the officer, and answer any questions asked by the officer in respect of them.

Request for Minister’s decision

84Section 39.14 of the Act is replaced by the following: 39.14 A person or entity from which goods were seized under subsection 39.06(1), or the lawful owner of the goods, may — within 90 days after the date of the seizure and by giving notice to the Minister in writing or by any other means satisfactory to the Minister — request a decision of the Minister as to whether the officer who seized the goods had reasonable grounds to believe that the goods were proceeds of crime as defined in subsection 462.3(1) of the Criminal Code or were related to money laundering, to the financing of terrorist activities or to sanctions evasion.

Decision of Minister

85Subsection 39.18(1) of the Act is replaced by the following: 39.18 (1) Within 90 days after the end of the period referred to in subsection 39.17(2), the Minister shall decide whether the officer who seized the goods had the reasonable grounds referred to in section 39.14 .

Return of goods

86Sections 39.19 and 39.2 of the Act are replaced by the following: 39.19 If the Minister decides that the officer who seized the goods did not have the reasonable grounds referred to in section 39.14 , the Minister of Public Works and Government Services shall, on being informed of the Minister’s decision, return the goods or an amount of money equal to their value at the time of the seizure, as the case may be.

Confirmation of forfeiture

39.2If the Minister decides that the officer who seized the goods had the reasonable grounds referred to in section 39.14 , the Minister may, subject to the terms and conditions that the Minister may determine and subject to any order made under section 39.24 or 39.25, confirm that the goods are forfeited to His Majesty in right of Canada.

87(1) Paragraph 53.6(1)(a) of the Act is replaced by the following: (a) has, during the five-year period before the day on which the application was submitted, been found guilty of an offence under section 74, 75 or 76, subsection 77(1) or section 77.01 or 77.1 of this Act; (2) Paragraph 53.6(1)(c) of the French version of the Act is replaced by the following: c) n’est pas inscrit sous le régime de l’article 11.1 de la présente loi. (3) Paragraph 53.6(2)(a) of the Act is replaced by the following: (a) a payment service provider that is registered , as those expressions are defined in section 2 of the Retail Payment Activities Act , is found guilty of an offence under section 74, 75 or 76, subsection 77(1) or section 77.01 or 77.1 of this Act; (4) Paragraph 53.6(2)(c) of the French version of the Act is replaced by the following: c) le Centre a révoqué, au titre des paragraphes 11.11(2), 11.13(2) ou 11.17(2) ou de l’article 11.171 de la présente loi, l’inscription d’un fournisseur de services de paiement enregistré , au sens de l’article 2 de la Loi sur les activités associées aux paiements de détail .

Roll

88The Act is amended by adding the following after section 54.1: 54.2 (1) The Centre is responsible for establishing and maintaining a roll of prescribed information submitted under section 11.4002, 11.4005, 11.4007, 11.4008 or 11.401. Organization and keeping of roll (2) The roll is to be organized in any manner and kept in any form that the Centre may determine. Public access (3) The Centre shall make available to the public the part of the information referred to in subsection (1) that is identifying information as defined in the regulations. Verification of information (4) The Centre may verify information submitted under section 11.4002, 11.4005, 11.4007, 11.4008, 11.401 or 11.4012. Accuracy of information (5) The Centre shall, in accordance with the regulations, ensure that inaccurate information on the roll is corrected. Analysis of information (6) The Centre may analyse and assess the information referred to in subsection (4) and, in that case, that analysis or assessment is deemed to be an analysis or assessment conducted under paragraph 54(1)(c). Retention of information (7) Subject to section 6 of the Privacy Act , the Centre shall retain information referred to in subsection (4) for 10 years beginning on the day on which the Centre denies an application for enrolment or for its renewal, on which an enrolled person or entity notifies the Centre under section 11.4012 or on which a person or entity is no longer enrolled with the Centre.

89(1) Subsection 55(1) of the Act is amended by adding the following after paragraph (b.2): (b.3) information provided under section 11.4002, 11.4005, 11.4007, 11.4008, 11.401 or 11.4012 except for identifying information referred to in subsection 54.2(3); (2) Subsection 55(3) of the Act is amended by adding the following after paragraph (f.1): (f.2) the Commissioner of Canada Elections, if the Centre also has reasonable grounds to suspect that the information is relevant to investigating or prosecuting an offence or violation under the Canada Elections Act or an attempt to commit such an offence or violation;

90Subsection 55.1(1) of the Act is amended by adding the following after paragraph (d): (d.1) the Commissioner of Canada Elections, if the Centre also has reasonable grounds to suspect that the information is relevant to investigating or prosecuting an offence or violation under the Canada Elections Act or an attempt to commit such an offence or violation;

To ensure compliance

91The portion of subsection 62(1) of the Act before paragraph (a) is replaced by the following: 62 (1) An authorized person may, from time to time, examine the records and inquire into the business and affairs of any person or entity referred to in section 5 or any person or entity that the authorized person believes on reasonable grounds to be a person or entity referred to in that section for the purpose of ensuring compliance with Part 1 or 1.1, and for that purpose may

Personne autorisée

92Section 72.1 of the French version of the Act is replaced by the following: 72.1 S’agissant d’une personne ou entité visée à l’alinéa 5h.1), il suffit, pour que les avis soient considérés comme signifiés par le Centre ou à sa demande, qu’ils soient signifiés à la personne dont le nom est indiqué dans la demande d’inscription visée au paragraphe 11.12(1) — ou qui est fourni conformément au paragraphe 11.13(1) — qui est autorisée à accepter, au nom de la personne ou entité visée à cet alinéa, des avis signifiés par le Centre en vertu de la présente loi ou que celui-ci fait signifier en vertu de celle-ci.

93Subsection 73(1) of the Act is amended by adding the following after paragraph (j): (j.1) respecting the enrolment referred to in sections 11.4001 to 11.4015;

94The heading of Part 4.1 of the Act is replaced by the following: Notices of Violation, Compliance Agreements, Compliance Orders and Penalties

Maximum penalties — prescribed violation

95(1) Paragraph 73.1(1)(b) of the Act is replaced by the following: (b) classifying each prescribed violation as a minor violation, a serious violation or a very serious violation and classifying a series of minor violations as a serious violation or a very serious violation; (2) Paragraph 73.1(1)(c) of the English version of the Act is replaced by the following: (c) having regard to subsection (2), fixing a penalty, or a range of penalties, in respect of any prescribed violation; (3) Paragraph 73.1(1)(d) of the Act is repealed. (4) Subsection 73.1(2) of the Act is replaced by the following: (2) The maximum penalty for a prescribed violation is $ 4,000,000 if the violation is committed by a person and $ 20,000,000 if the violation is committed by an entity. Maximum penalties — cumulative (3) The maximum penalty for all the prescribed violations identified on a notice of violation taken together is (a) in the case of a person, the greater of $4,000,000 and 3% of the person’s gross global income in the year before the one in which the penalty is imposed; and (b) in the case of an entity, the greater of $20,000,000 and 3% of the entity’s gross global revenue in its financial year before the one in which the penalty is imposed. Gross global revenue — affiliated entities (4) If an entity is part of a group of entities that are affiliated, within the meaning of subsection 9.8(2), then, for the purpose of determining the maximum penalty applicable to the entity under paragraph (3)(b), the entity’s gross global revenue is deemed to be the gross global revenue of the group for the financial year before the one in which the penalty is imposed.

Criteria for penalty

96Sections 73.11 to 73.13 of the Act are replaced by the following: 73.11 Except if a penalty is fixed under paragraph 73.1(1)(c), the amount of a penalty shall, in each case, be determined taking into account (a) the fact that penalties have as their purpose to encourage compliance with this Act rather than to punish; (b) the harm done by the violation; (c) the ability of the person or entity to pay the amount; and (d) any other criteria that may be prescribed by regulation.

Information respecting ability to pay

73.111(1) Subject to subsection (2), if the Centre requests information from the person or entity to enable the Centre to take into account paragraph 73.11(c), the person or entity may, in any representations made under subsection 73.15(2) with respect to that paragraph, rely only on information that the person or entity provided to the Centre before the deadline indicated by the Centre. New information (2) In the representations, the person or entity may rely on new information with respect to paragraph 73.11(c) only if (a) that information is with respect to facts that arose after the deadline; (b) that information was not reasonably available before the deadline; or (c) the person or entity could not reasonably have been expected in the circumstances to have provided that information before the deadline.

Violation or offence

73.12If an act or omission may be proceeded with as a violation or as an offence, proceeding with it in one manner precludes proceeding with it in the other.

Prescribed violations

73.13Every contravention that is designated under paragraph 73.1(1)(a) constitutes a prescribed violation and the person or entity that commits the prescribed violation is liable to a penalty determined in accordance with sections 73.1 and 73.11.

Notice of violation

97The Act is amended by adding the following before section 73.14: 73.131 If the Centre believes on reasonable grounds that a person or entity has committed a prescribed violation or a compliance order violation , the Centre may issue and cause to be served on the person or entity a notice of violation.

Contents of notice

98The portion of subsection 73.14(1) of the Act before paragraph (a) is replaced by the following: 73.14 (1) When the Centre issues a notice of violation, the notice shall name the person or entity believed to have committed a violation, identify the violation and set out

Notice of decision and right of appeal

99Subsection 73.15(4) of the Act is replaced by the following: (4) The Director shall cause notice of any decision made under subsection (2) or the penalty imposed under subsection (3) to be issued and served on the person or entity together with, in the case of a decision made under subsection (2) in respect of a serious violation, a very serious violation or a compliance order violation , notice of the right of appeal under subsection 73.21(1).

Compliance agreement

100The heading before section 73.16 and sections 73.16 to 73.2 of the Act are replaced by the following: Compliance Agreements, Compliance Orders and Compliance Order Violations 73.16 (1) If a person or entity has committed a prescribed violation, then as soon as feasible after proceedings with respect to that prescribed violation are ended, the Centre shall require the person or entity to enter into a compliance agreement with the Centre. Mandatory content (2) The compliance agreement shall identify the prescribed violation and the provision to which it relates and, in addition to any other terms to which the parties may agree, shall include the following terms: (a) the measures that are to be taken by the person or entity to comply with the provision; and (b) the deadline for complying with the agreement. Extension of deadline (3) The Centre may amend the agreement by extending the deadline referred to in paragraph (2)(b) by a maximum period of one year if it is satisfied that the person or entity is making substantial progress in meeting the terms of the agreement, such that an extension would encourage compliance with this Act. Refusal to enter into agreement (4) Unless the person or entity enters into a compliance agreement within six months after the Centre requires it, or within any other longer period that the Centre allows, the person or entity is deemed to have refused to enter into a compliance agreement.

Compliance order

73.17(1) If a person or entity refuses to enter into a compliance agreement or fails to comply with such an agreement before the deadline referred to in paragraph 73.16(2)(b), the Director of the Centre shall, as soon as feasible after the refusal or the deadline, as the case may be, make a compliance order and cause it to be served on the person or entity. Mandatory content (2) The compliance order shall identify the name of the person or entity that committed the prescribed violation and the provision to which the violation relates, specify that the person or entity refused to enter into a compliance agreement or that they failed to comply with one, as the case may be, and include the following terms: (a) a requirement that the person or entity comply with the provision; (b) a requirement that the person or entity make public the measures taken or to be taken by the person or entity to comply with the provision; and (c) the deadline for complying with the order. Reasons (3) The Director may include in the order the reasons for making it, including the relevant facts, analysis and considerations that formed part of the decision. Publication of compliance order (4) As soon as feasible after making the compliance order, the Director shall make it public. Extension of deadline for compliance (5) The Director may amend the order by extending the deadline referred to in paragraph (2)(c) by a maximum period of one year if the Director is satisfied that the person or entity is making substantial progress in meeting the terms of the order, such that an extension would encourage compliance with this Act.

Compliance order violation

73.18(1) The contravention of a compliance order made under section 73.17 is a compliance order violation and the person or entity that commits the compliance order violation is liable to a penalty determined in accordance with subsection (2). Penalty (2) The amount of a penalty for a compliance order violation shall, in each case, be determined in accordance with section 73.11 and shall not exceed (a) in the case of a person, the greater of $5,000,000 and 3% of the person’s gross global income in the year before the one in which the penalty is imposed; and (b) in the case of an entity, the greater of $30,000,000 and 3% of the entity’s gross global revenue in its financial year before the one in which the penalty is imposed. Gross global revenue — affiliated entities (3) If an entity is part of a group of entities that are affiliated, within the meaning of subsection 9.8(2), then, for the purpose of determining the maximum penalty applicable to the entity under paragraph (2)(b), the entity’s gross global revenue is deemed to be the gross global revenue of the group for the financial year before the one in which the penalty is imposed.

Right of appeal

101(1) Subsection 73.21(1) of the Act is replaced by the following: 73.21 (1) A person or entity on which a notice of a decision made under subsection 73.15(2) is served, in respect of a serious violation, a very serious violation or a compliance order violation , may, within 30 days after the day on which the notice is served, or within any longer period that the Court allows, appeal the decision to the Federal Court.

Publication

102(1) The portion of subsection 73.22(1) of the Act before paragraph (a) is replaced by the following: 73.22 (1) In the following cases, the Centre shall make public, as soon as feasible, the nature of the violation, the name of the person or entity and the amount of the applicable penalty:

Collecting penalties

103Subsection 73.27(1) of the Act is replaced by the following: 73.27 (1) The Centre may, for the purpose of collecting penalties proposed in a notice of violation or imposed under this Part, enter into a contract, memorandum of understanding or other agreement with a department or an agency of the Government of Canada or the government of a province and with any other person or organization, inside Canada, in its own name or in the name of His Majesty in right of Canada.

Evidence

104Section 73.4 of the Act is replaced by the following: 73.4 In a proceeding in respect of a violation or a prosecution for an offence, a notice of violation purporting to be issued under section 73.131 , a notice of decision purporting to be issued under subsection 73.15(4) or a certificate purporting to be made under subsection 73.26(1) is admissible in evidence without proof of the signature or official character of the person appearing to have signed it.

105(1) The portion of subsection 74(1) of the Act before paragraph (a) is amended by replacing “sections 9.5 to 9.7” with “section 9.5, subsections 9.6(1), (2) and (3), sections 9.61, 9.7”. (2) The portion of subsection 74(1) of the Act before paragraph (a) is amended by replacing “11.1” with “11.1, 11.4001”. (3) Paragraphs 74(1)(a) and (b) of the Act are replaced by the following: (a) on summary conviction, to a fine of not more than $ 2,500,000 or to imprisonment for a term of not more than two years less a day, or to both; or (b) on conviction on indictment, to a fine of not more than $ 5,000,000 or to imprisonment for a term of not more than five years, or to both. (4) Paragraphs 74(2)(a) and (b) of the Act are replaced by the following: (a) on summary conviction, to a fine of not more than $ 2,500,000 or to imprisonment for a term of not more than two years less a day, or to both; or (b) on conviction on indictment, to a fine of not more than $ 5,000,000 or to imprisonment for a term of not more than five years, or to both.

106Paragraphs 75(1)(a) and (b) of the Act are replaced by the following: (a) on summary conviction, to a fine of not more than $ 10,000,000 or to imprisonment for a term of not more than two years less a day, or to both; or (b) on conviction on indictment, to a fine of not more than $ 20,000,000 or to imprisonment for a term of not more than five years, or to both.

Disclosure

107(1) The portion of section 76 of the English version of the Act before paragraph (a) is replaced by the following: 76 Every person or entity that contravenes section 8 is guilty of an offence and liable

Reporting — section 9

108Sections 77 to 77.1 of the Act are replaced by the following: 77 (1) Every person or entity that contravenes subsection 9(1) or (3) is guilty of an offence and liable on summary conviction to a fine of not more than $ 10,000,000 . Reporting — section 11.43 (2) Every person or entity that contravenes section 11.43, only insofar as it relates to any required reporting measure as contemplated by paragraph 11.42(2)(e) and specified in a directive issued under subsection 11.42(1), is guilty of an offence and liable on summary conviction to a fine of not more than $ 10,000,000 .

Verifications and reviews — sections 9.92 and 9.93

77.01Every person or entity that knowingly contravenes section 9.92 or 9.93 is guilty of an offence and liable (a) on summary conviction, to a fine of not more than $ 2,500,000 or to imprisonment for a term of not more than two years less a day, or to both; or (b) on conviction on indictment, to a fine of not more than $ 5,000,000 or to imprisonment for a term of not more than five years, or to both.

Provision of information

77.1(1) Every person or entity that, under this Act, is required to provide information to the Centre or to a person responsible for carrying out functions under this Act is guilty of an offence if they knowingly (a) withhold material information; (b) make a false or misleading statement, including by omission ; or (c) provide false or misleading information, including by omission . Punishment (2) Every person or entity that commits an offence under subsection (1) is liable (a) on summary conviction, to a fine of not more than $ 2,500,000 or to imprisonment for a term of not more than two years less a day, or to both; or (b) on conviction on indictment, to a fine of not more than $ 5,000,000 or to imprisonment for a term of not more than five years, or to both.

Punishment

109(1) The portion of subsection 77.2(2) of the English version of the Act before paragraph (a) is replaced by the following: (2) Every person or entity that commits an offence under subsection (1) is liable (2) Paragraphs 77.2(2)(a) and (b) of the Act are replaced by the following: (a) on summary conviction, to a fine of not more than $1,000,000 or to imprisonment for a term of not more than one year, or to both ; or (b) on conviction on indictment, to a fine of not more than $2,500,000 or to imprisonment for a term of not more than five years, or to both .

110Paragraphs 77.3(3)(a) and (b) of the Act are replaced by the following: (a) on summary conviction, to a fine of not more than $1,000,000 or imprisonment for a term of not more than two years less a day, or to both; or (b) on conviction on indictment, to a fine of not more than $2,500,000 or imprisonment for a term of not more than five years, or to both.

111Paragraphs 77.4(a) and (b) of the Act are replaced by the following: (a) on summary conviction, to a fine of not more than $ 2,500,000 or to imprisonment for a term of not more than two years less a day, or to both; or (b) on conviction on indictment, to a fine of not more than $ 5,000,000 or to imprisonment for a term of not more than five years, or to both.

Time limitation — five years

112Subsection 81(1) of the Act is replaced by the following: 81 (1) Proceedings under paragraph 74(1)(a), 74(2)(a), 75(1)(a) or 76(a), subsection 77(1) or (2) or paragraph 77.1(2)(a) or 77.2(2)(a) may be instituted within, but not after, five years after the time when the subject-matter of the proceedings arose.

Documents : inscription

113Subsection 83.3(1) of the French version of the Act is replaced by the following: 83.3 (1) Toute personne ou entité déterminée qui, à la date de référence, est inscrite auprès du Centre en application de l’article 11.1 lui fournit, selon les modalités réglementaires, les documents visés aux alinéas 11.12(1)b) et c), au plus tard au deuxième anniversaire.

114Paragraphs 48(1)(c) and (d) of the Retail Payment Activities Act are replaced by the following: (c) the applicant has been found guilty of an offence under section 74, 75 or 76, subsection 77(1) or section 77.01 or 77.1 of the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act ; (d) during the five-year period before the day on which the application was submitted, the Director of the Centre, under subsection 73.15(4) of that Act, caused a notice of a decision or of an imposed penalty to be issued and served on the applicant in respect of a serious violation, a very serious violation or a compliance order violation under that Act;

115Paragraphs 52(b) and (c) of the Act are replaced by the following: (b) the payment service provider has been found guilty of an offence under section 74, 75 or 76, subsection 77(1) or section 77.01 or 77.1 of the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act ; (c) the Director of the Centre, under subsection 73.15(4) of that Act, has caused a notice of a decision or of an imposed penalty to be issued and served on the payment service provider in respect of a serious violation, a very serious violation or a compliance order violation under that Act;

116The portion of section 3 of the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Administrative Monetary Penalties Regulations before paragraph (a) is replaced by the following: 3 The contravention of any of the following provisions is a violation that may be proceeded with under Part 4.1 of the Act:

117Subsection 4(2) of the Regulations is replaced by the following: (2) A series of minor violations identified on a notice of violation shall be considered to be a serious violation for the purpose of section 73.21 of the Act if the total of the penalties for the violations set out in the notice is equal to or greater than $ 400,000 .

118Section 5 of the Regulations is replaced by the following: 5 Subject to subsections 73.1(2) and (3) of the Act, the range of penalties in respect of a violation is (a) $1 to $ 40,000 in the case of a minor violation; (b) $1 to $ 4,000,000 in the case of a serious violation; and (c) $1 to $ 20,000,000 in the case of a very serious violation.

119Part 1 of the schedule to the Regulations is amended by adding the following after item 9: Column 1 Column 2 Item Provision of Act Classification of Violation 9.1 9.6(1.1) Very serious

120The portion of items 196 to 201 of Part 2 of the schedule to the Regulations in column 3 is replaced by the following: Column 3 Item Classification of Violation 196 Very serious 197 Very serious 198 Very serious 199 Very serious 200 Very serious 201 Very serious

Definitions

121The following definitions apply in this section and in sections 122 and 123 . commencement day means the day on which this section comes into force. ( date de référence ) former Act means the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act as it read immediately before the commencement day. ( ancienne loi ) new Act means the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act as it reads on the commencement day. ( nouvelle loi )

Violations — former Act

122Part 4.1 of the former Act continues to apply with respect to any violation , as defined in subsection 2(1) of the former Act, alleged to have been committed before the commencement day.

Violations — new Act

123For greater certainty, Part 4.1 of the new Act applies with respect to any compliance order violation or prescribed violation , as those terms are defined in subsection 2(1) of the new Act, alleged to have been committed on or after the commencement day.

Order in council

124Subsection 76 (3), sections 77 , 80 and 82 , subsections 87 (2) and (4), section 88 , subsection 89 (1), sections 91 to 93 , subsection 105 (2) and section 113 come into force on a day to be fixed by order of the Governor in Council.

PART 10Inclusion of Director in Supervisory Committee
What it does

This part adds the Director of the Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada to the Supervisory Committee of the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions and allows for the exchange of relevant information between them.

Why it matters

This change aims to improve cooperation among financial regulatory bodies, which can lead to better oversight and prevention of financial crimes like money laundering and terrorist financing. Enhanced information sharing can help protect the financial system and the public.

The problem it addresses

The provision seeks to close gaps in coordination and information sharing between key financial oversight bodies.

Who benefits

The public and financial institutions benefit from improved security measures against financial crimes and enhanced regulatory oversight.

The tradeoff

The expansion of information sharing could potentially raise concerns about privacy and the protection of individual data, as the Director gains more access to sensitive financial information.

Financial institutionsFinancial Transactions and Reports Analysis CentreRegulatory agenciesConsumersIndividuals in financial transactions

Amends: Legislation Related to Financial Institutions (Supervisory Committee)

Read the actual text (2)

125Subsection 18(1) of the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions Act is amended by striking out “and” at the end of paragraph (c), by adding “and” at the end of paragraph (d) and by adding the following after paragraph (d): (e) the Director of the Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada.

Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions Act

126The Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act is amended by adding the following after section 53.4: 53.41 (1) For the purpose referred to in subsection 18(3) of the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions Act , the Director may disclose to, and collect from, the other members of the committee established under subsection 18(1) of that Act any information referred to in that subsection 18(3). Limitation — Director (2) The Director may disclose information under subsection (1) only if it relates to compliance with Part 1 or 1.1.

PART 11Amendments to sex offender registration rules
What it does

This part of the bill amends the Sex Offender Information Registration Act, changing reporting obligations for sex offenders and allowing new disclosures of their information to law enforcement. It also updates what constitutes a reasonable excuse for non-compliance and clarifies the role of the Canada Border Services Agency in sharing information about sex offenders.

Why it matters

These amendments aim to enhance public safety by improving law enforcement's ability to monitor and investigate sex offenders. This could potentially help prevent sexual crimes and enhance community protection.

The problem it addresses

The provisions address gaps in the reporting and monitoring of sex offenders, which may hinder the prevention and investigation of sexual crimes.

Who benefits

Law enforcement agencies benefit from having better access to information about sex offenders, which can aid in their efforts to protect the public.

The tradeoff

The increased tracking and data collection on sex offenders may infringe on their privacy rights and could lead to stigmatization or discrimination against them.

Sex offendersLaw enforcement agenciesCanada Border Services AgencyIndigenous governing bodiesVictims of sexual crimes

Amends: Sex Offender Information Registration Act

Read the actual text (11)
Purpose

127(1) Subsection 2(1) of the Sex Offender Information Registration Act is replaced by the following: 2 (1) The purpose of this Act is to help police services and other law enforcement agencies prevent and investigate crimes of a sexual nature by requiring the registration of certain information relating to sex offenders.

128(1) Paragraph (b) of the definition member of a police service in subsection 3(1) of the English version of the Act is replaced by the following: (b) in an area in which an Indigenous police service is responsible for policing, a member of that police service. ( membre d’un service de police ) (2) Subsection 3(1) of the Act is amended by adding the following in alphabetical order: Indigenous governing body means a council, government or other entity that is authorized to act on behalf of an Indigenous group, community or people that holds rights recognized and affirmed by section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982 . ( corps dirigeant autochtone )

129Paragraph 4(1)(d) of the Act is replaced by the following: (d) they are released from custody on the expiry of the sentence for the offence in connection with which the order is made or on statutory release , full parole or day parole , as those terms are defined in subsection 99(1) of the Corrections and Conditional Release Act , or work release as defined in subsection 18(1) of that Act .

130(1) Subsection 4.1(1) of the Act is amended by adding the following after paragraph (b): (b.01) within seven days after a change to the license plate number, make, model, body type, year of manufacture or colour of a motor vehicle that is registered in their name or that they use regularly or, if they are required to report to a registration centre designated under the National Defence Act , within 15 days after the change; (2) Paragraph 4.1(1)(c) of the Act is replaced by the following: (c) within 30 days before each anniversary of the day on which they were required to report to a registration centre under subsection 4(1) or (2), as the case may be.

Additional information

131Subsection 5(3) of the Act is replaced by the following: (3) When a sex offender reports to a registration centre in person, the person who collects the information referred to in subsection (1) may record any physical characteristic that may assist in the sex offender’s identification, including their eye colour, hair colour and any tattoos and distinguishing marks , and may require that the sex offender’s photograph be taken.

For greater certainty

132Section 6 of the Act is amended by adding the following after subsection (1.02): (1.03) For greater certainty, the death of a family member of the sex offender, a critical illness affecting a family member of the sex offender or another family emergency may constitute a reasonable excuse, having regard to the circumstances.

Canada Border Services Agency — disclosure of information

133The Act is amended by adding the following after section 15.2: 15.3 The Canada Border Services Agency may disclose the following information in respect of a sex offender to a member or employee of, or a person retained by, a law enforcement agency for the purpose of the administration or enforcement of this Act: (a) the surname, first name and middle names, any alias, the date of birth, the citizenship or nationality and the sex of the sex offender; (b) the type and number of each travel document that identifies the sex offender and the name of the country or organization that issued it; (c) the date, time and place of the sex offender’s departure from Canada, their country of destination, the date, time and place of their arrival in Canada and the last country from which they arrived; and (d) in the case of an arrival in or departure from Canada by aircraft, the flight code that identifies the air carrier , as defined in subsection 3(1) of the Aeronautics Act , and the flight number.

134(1) Paragraph 16(2)(b.1) of the Act is replaced by the following: (b.1) a member or employee of, or a person retained by, a police service who consults information at a registration centre designated under the National Defence Act to verify compliance by a sex offender who is subject to the Code of Service Discipline — or who is an officer, or non-commissioned member, of the primary reserve as defined in section 227 of the National Defence Act — with an order or with an obligation under section 490.019 or 490.02901 of the Criminal Code , section 227.06 of the National Defence Act or section 36.1 of the International Transfer of Offenders Act ; (2) Subsection 16(2) of the Act is amended by adding the following after paragraph (c): (c.1) a member or employee of, or a person retained by, the Canada Border Services Agency who consults the information in order to exercise the functions or perform the duties assigned to them under an Act of Parliament; (3) The portion of paragraph 16(4)(c) of the Act before subparagraph (i) is replaced by the following: (c) unless the disclosure is to a member or employee of, or a person retained by, a law enforcement agency and there are reasonable grounds to believe that the disclosure will (4) Subparagraphs 16(4)(c)(i) to (iv) of the English version of the Act are replaced by the following: (i) assist them in the investigation of an offence under section 17 or in the laying of a charge for such an offence, (i.1) assist them in the verification of the sex offender’s compliance with section 5, (ii) assist them in the prevention or investigation of a crime of a sexual nature, an offence under section 119.1 of the National Defence Act , an offence under section 490.031 or 490.0311 of the Criminal Code or an offence under either of those provisions that is punishable under section 130 of the National Defence Act or assist them in the laying of a charge for such an offence, (iii) assist them in the investigation of a criminal offence or a service offence , as defined in subsection 2(1) of the National Defence Act or in the laying of a charge for such an offence, as long as the investigation or charge results from an investigation referred to in subparagraph (ii), or (iv) assist them in obtaining a warrant under subsection 490.03121(1) of the Criminal Code and executing the warrant; (5) Subsection 16(4) of the Act is amended by adding the following after paragraph (c): (c.1) unless the disclosure is made to a victim of or witness to a crime of a sexual nature by a member or employee of, or a person retained by, a law enforcement agency who received the information under paragraph (c) and there are reasonable grounds to believe that the disclosure will assist in the investigation of the crime; (c.2) unless the disclosure is to a department or agency of the Government of Canada or of a provincial, territorial or municipal government in Canada or to an Indigenous governing body and there are reasonable grounds to believe that the disclosure will assist in the prevention or investigation of a crime of a sexual nature; (6) Paragraphs 16(4)(j.1) and (j.2) of the Act are replaced by the following: (j.1) unless the disclosure is to a member or employee of, or a person retained by, a law enforcement agency outside Canada and there are reasonable grounds to believe the disclosure will assist them in the prevention or investigation of a crime of a sexual nature; (j.2) unless the disclosure is to the Canada Border Services Agency, it is limited to the information referred to in paragraphs 5(1)(a), (b), (i) and (j) and there are reasonable grounds to believe that it will assist a member or employee of, or a person retained by, a law enforcement agency in the prevention or investigation of a crime of a sexual nature or an offence under section 490.031 or 490.0311 of the Criminal Code or in the laying of a charge for such an offence;

Offence

135Section 17 of the Act is replaced by the following: 17 (1) Every person who knowingly contravenes any of subsections 16(1) to (5) is guilty of an offence and liable on summary conviction to a fine of not more than $10,000 or to imprisonment for a term of not more than six months, or to both. For greater certainty (2) For greater certainty, a person is not guilty of an offence under subsection (1) if they believed that they were acting in accordance with section 16.

136The English version of the Act is amended by replacing “gender” with “sex” in the following provisions: (a) paragraph 5(1)(b); (b) subparagraph 8(a)(vi); (c) paragraph 8.1(1)(g); and (d) paragraphs 8.2(1)(f) and (2)(g).

137Subsection 107(5) of the Customs Act is amended by adding the following after paragraph (l.3): (l.4) any person who may receive information under section 15.2 or 15.3 of the Sex Offender Information Registration Act , solely for the purpose for which the information is provided;

Schedule 1Regulation of controlled substances and precursors
What it does

This part lists specific controlled substances and their legal periods of regulation, along with corresponding precursors and mixtures that also fall under these regulations.

Why it matters

It is important for ensuring public safety by controlling substances that can be misused for illegal drug production. This regulation helps mitigate the impact of drug-related issues in communities.

The problem it addresses

This schedule addresses the need to regulate certain substances that can be abused or used in the manufacture of illicit drugs.

Who benefits

The general public benefits from reduced risks associated with drug abuse and related criminal activities.

The tradeoff

The tradeoff involves restricting access to certain substances for legitimate users, which might impact industries that require these chemicals for lawful purposes.

Drug manufacturersPharmaceutical companiesLaw enforcement agenciesConsumers of controlled substancesPublic health organizations
Official record· parl.ca
Official drafter summary (parl.ca)

Part 1 amends the Customs Act to provide the Canada Border Services Agency with facilities free of charge for carrying out any purpose related to the administration or enforcement of that Act and other Acts of Parliament and to provide officers of that Agency with access at certain locations to goods destined for export. It also includes transitional provisions. Part 2 amends the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act to create a new temporary accelerated scheduling pathway that allows the Minister of Health to add precursor chemicals to Schedule V to that Act. It also makes related amendments to the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (Police Enforcement) Regulations and the Precursor Control Regulations . Part 3 amends the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act and the Cannabis Act to confirm that the Governor in Council may, on the recommendation of the Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness, make regulations exempting members of law enforcement from the application of any provision of the Criminal Code that creates drug-related inchoate offences when they are undertaking lawful investigations. Part 4 amends the Oceans Act to transfer the responsibility for the coast guard services from the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans to the Minister of National Defence, to provide that coast guard services include activities related to security and to authorize the responsible minister to collect, analyze and disclose information and intelligence. Part 5 amends the Department of Citizenship and Immigration Act to authorize the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration to disclose, for certain purposes and subject to any regulations, personal information under the control of the Department within the Department and to certain other federal and provincial government entities. It also amends the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act to authorize the making of regulations relating to the disclosure of information collected for the purposes of that Act to federal departments and agencies. Part 6 amends the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act to, among other things, (a) eliminate the designated countries of origin regime; (b) authorize the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration to specify the information and documents that are required in support of a claim for refugee protection; (c) authorize the Refugee Protection Division of the Immigration and Refugee Board to determine that claims for refugee protection that have not yet been referred to the Refugee Protection Division have been abandoned in certain circumstances; (d) provide the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration with the power to determine that claims for refugee protection that have not yet been referred to the Refugee Protection Division have been withdrawn in certain circumstances; (e) prevent, if the claimant is not present in Canada, the Refugee Protection Division and the Refugee Appeal Division from commencing consideration of the claim or the appeal or to require them to deem the claim to have been abandoned in certain circumstances; (f) clarify that decisions of the Immigration and Refugee Board must be rendered, and reasons for those decisions must be given, in the manner specified by its Chairperson; and (g) authorize regulations to be made setting out the circumstances in which the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration or the Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness must designate, in relation to certain proceedings or applications, a representative for persons who are under 18 years of age or who are unable to appreciate the nature of the proceeding or application. It also includes transitional provisions. Part 7 amends the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act to, among other things, (a) authorize the Governor in Council to make an order specifying that certain applications made under that Act are not to be accepted for processing, or that the processing of those applications is to be suspended or terminated, when the Governor in Council is of the opinion that it is in the public interest to do so; (b) authorize the Governor in Council to make an order to cancel, suspend or vary certain documents issued under that Act, or to impose or vary conditions, when the Governor in Council is of the opinion that it is in the public interest to do so; (c) for the application of an order referred to in paragraph (b), require a person to appear for an examination, answer questions truthfully and produce all relevant documents or evidence that an officer requires; and (d) authorize the Governor in Council to make regulations prescribing circumstances in which a document issued under that Act can be cancelled, suspended or varied, and in which officers may terminate the processing of certain applications made under that Act. Part 8 amends the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act to add two new grounds of ineligibility for claims for refugee protection as well as powers to make regulations respecting exceptions to those new...

AI-assisted analysis
What MPs debatedCONTESTED754 speeches · 118 MPs · 186,127 words
Points of contention
  • Disagreement over treatment of asylum seekers and retroactive claims
  • Concerns over the balance between security measures and personal freedoms
  • The effectiveness of measures to combat fentanyl and organized crime

The debate saw Conservatives and NDP sharply critical of Liberals, reflecting deep divisions on crime and immigration.

Where MPs stood105 MPs · grouped by party · ranked by speaking volume
AI-assisted analysis
CPC55 spoke · 5 support · 39 oppose
Michelle Rempel Garner
Michelle Rempel GarnerOPPOSES23 speeches · 10,205 words
Criticized the government's management of the immigration system as dysfunctional and failing to prioritize vulnerable asylum seekers.Canada's asylum system is deeply and fundamentally broken after 10 years of Liberal government.
Brad Redekopp
Brad RedekoppOPPOSES15 speeches · 6,976 words
Criticized the government for poor handling of immigration issues and creating a flawed system.The bill would fix some of those messes, it certainly does not fix them all, so I am looking for more from the government.
Frank Caputo
Frank CaputoOPPOSES20 speeches · 6,936 words
Criticized the bill for being an omnibus that combines too many unrelated issues, making it unworkable.Bill C-12 is obviously a reiteration of some portions of Bill C-2. Conservatives have been very vocal on problematic aspects of Bill C-2.
Rhonda Kirkland
Rhonda KirklandOPPOSES12 speeches · 3,327 words
Argued that Canadians are justified in their concerns about safety, immigration, and border issues due to government failures.Canadians cannot take the government's assurances at face value anymore. The privacy risks are serious, the enforcement gaps are dangerous, and the Liberal record demands skepticism, not blind trust.
HG
Harb GillOPPOSES12 speeches · 3,139 words
Criticized the bill for adding responsibilities without providing necessary resources.At the end of the day, this comes down to something very simple: trust. People in Windsor trust institutions when those institutions prove they understand reality, but this bill does not reflect the reality that border communities like mine live every day.
Sukhman Gill
Sukhman GillOPPOSES8 speeches · 2,969 words
Criticized the bill for not adequately addressing immigration and border security issues.Mr. Speaker, the truth is that Canadians are worse off now than ever.
James Bezan
James BezanOPPOSES7 speeches · 2,845 words
Criticized the bill for not adequately empowering the Canadian Coast Guard with enforcement capabilities.We are concerned that there are things in here that are not going to do anything to improve immigration, improve public safety or strengthen our borders.
Costas Menegakis
Costas MenegakisOPPOSES10 speeches · 2,408 words
Criticized the Liberal government for the systematic decline of the immigration system over the past 11 years.Canada's once well-perceived, respected and functional immigration system has been ruined by 10 years of abysmal Liberal policy.
Blaine Calkins
Blaine CalkinsSUPPORTS5 speeches · 2,183 words
Supported sending Bill C-12 to committee for further examination and potential improvements.Yes, we will support it to get it to committee, and we will do our due diligence.
Connie Cody
Connie CodyMIXED9 speeches · 2,081 words
Highlighted concerns about ongoing issues like drug trafficking and gun smuggling despite the bill's intent to strengthen border security.Bill C-12 is a small step in the right direction, but it is not without problems.
GM
Greg McLeanOPPOSES6 speeches · 2,068 words
Criticized the Liberal government for breaking the immigration system and claiming to fix it with Bill C-12.It is the classic Liberal playbook: They break the system then hold a press conference to announce they are fixing it.
FD
Fred DaviesOPPOSES5 speeches · 2,003 words
Criticized the government's handling of border security measures and the lack of timely action on essential technologies.Canadians want solutions, but the government has proposed none.
Dane Lloyd
Dane LloydSUPPORTS4 speeches · 1,978 words
Argued that the bill aims to address issues with the broken border and immigration systems exacerbated by previous Liberal policies.After 10 years of reckless Liberal policies, our border is broken, and we need to fix it.
LB
Luc BertholdOPPOSES5 speeches · 1,967 words
Criticized the bill as a superficial fix that fails to address root causes of immigration issues caused by the Liberal government.Bill C‑12 is a superficial fix to tackle the damage caused by the Liberals over the past 10 years.
DB
David BexteMIXED11 speeches · 1,961 words
Argued that while Bill C-12 includes measures to enhance border security and accountability, it raises serious concerns about privacy protections.Law-abiding Canadians deserve better. They deserve strong protections for privacy and freedom.
Kelly McCauley
Kelly McCauleyOPPOSES8 speeches · 1,927 words
Criticized the government's inaction on human trafficking issues linked to federally funded projects.Human trafficking is happening on government-funded projects.
Glen Motz
Glen MotzMIXED6 speeches · 1,841 words
Criticized the bill for not sufficiently securing borders and addressing public safety concerns.Bill C-12 is a step in the right direction; however, serious amendments are required to the bill.
Vincent Ho
Vincent HoOPPOSES5 speeches · 1,834 words
Criticized the bill for failing to address key border security issues, including the illegal flow of fentanyl and weapons.This bill will not fix our immigration system and does not protect Canadians.
Kyle Seeback
Kyle SeebackMIXED6 speeches · 1,831 words
Argued that some aspects of the bill may have potential value but require thorough examination at committee.We think there might be some things in here that are worth supporting, but, of course, we need to study them at committee.
JM
Jacob MantleOPPOSES7 speeches · 1,822 words
Criticized the government for failing to adequately manage borders and immigration, highlighting serious criminal cases involving non-citizens.Let me talk about the mess the government has made of immigration. [...] Bill C-12, despite being called a fix to our immigration system, does nothing for this.
Ted Falk
Ted FalkOPPOSES4 speeches · 1,811 words
Criticized the government's failure to hire necessary CBSA officers, which he argues is essential for strengthening border security.Bill C-12 carries the same impulse. Translated into law, it hides coercion in the language of administration.
Cathay Wagantall
Cathay WagantallOPPOSES6 speeches · 1,790 words
Criticized the government for infringing on individual freedoms and privacy with previous bills, particularly Bill C-2.This government has to take responsibility for its behaviour, and as far as that question about the mail, Canadians are still very concerned about those other issues, and they are watching.
PK
Pat KellyMIXED8 speeches · 1,790 words
Argued that Bill C-12 does not adequately address problems with terrorist financing and money laundering.It would still report, as an institution, to the Minister of Fisheries, the Minister of Transport and now also to the Minister of National Defence.
Billy Morin
Billy MorinMIXED4 speeches · 1,776 words
Argued that Bill C-12 provides an opportunity to restore integrity at borders and combat drug trafficking.Bill C-12 can help us do all this if we get it right.
Michael Guglielmin
Michael GuglielminMIXED6 speeches · 1,724 words
Criticized the government's previous Bill C-2 for being overly intrusive and a violation of privacy.While Bill C-12 is an improvement and is something that the Conservatives plan to support and send to committee for further study, it does remain incomplete.
Arnold Viersen
Arnold ViersenOPPOSES6 speeches · 1,695 words
Criticized the government for not addressing major concerns from the previous bill, C-2, in Bill C-12.The government continually goes after the freedoms that Canadians enjoy in Canada, and we see its subtle and dogged attack on things like charitable organizations in this country.
Brad Vis
Brad VisSUPPORTS6 speeches · 1,668 words
Argued that Bill C-12 addresses long-standing grievances about immigration and border security.We supported some long-standing measures in Bill C-12 that would improve public safety.
LG
Laila GoodridgeOPPOSES4 speeches · 1,646 words
Criticized the government for mismanagement of public safety and ineffective previous legislation.After 10 years of the Liberals, we continue to see crime increase in this country.
AK
Arpan KhannaOPPOSES7 speeches · 1,644 words
Argued that Liberal policies have led to a decline in safety and security in Canada.It is their failures, mismanagement, negligence and incompetence that have led our country to be in the state it is in today.
Chris Lewis
Chris LewisOPPOSES4 speeches · 1,625 words
Criticized Bill C-12 for failing to address necessary improvements to border security and immigration, arguing it requires significant amendments.In its current form, the answer is no. Conservatives have long called for improvements to border security and our broken immigration system.
Kerry Diotte
Kerry DiotteOPPOSES5 speeches · 1,620 words
Criticized the government's handling of illegal drug consumption sites, arguing they contribute to crime and deteriorate neighborhoods.It is shocking that they encourage these sites. Does it not make sense that, if we truly are a caring society, rather than pushing people into these sites, we do the humane thing and help people recover?
Tamara Kronis
Tamara KronisMIXED4 speeches · 1,616 words
Argued that while Bill C-12 is an improvement over Bill C-2, it still fails to address critical issues such as sentencing for fentanyl traffickers.Bill C-12 ... falls far short of what Canadians deserve.
Matt Strauss
Matt StraussOPPOSES3 speeches · 1,589 words
Criticized the bill's provisions as governmental overreach that violates charter rights.Bill C-12, in its previous iteration as Bill C-2, would not only violate patient-physician confidentiality but also allow the government to read letter mail without a warrant.
Todd Doherty
Todd DohertyOPPOSES5 speeches · 1,585 words
Criticized Bill C-12 for failing to address the ongoing mental health and addiction crisis in Canada.Bill C-12 does nothing to stop the scourge of fentanyl, drugs or guns coming over our borders.
Jason Groleau
Jason GroleauOPPOSES5 speeches · 1,578 words
Argued that Bill C-12 lacks clear direction and effective measures.Bill C-12 claims to strengthen the security and integrity of the system, but once again, it is superficial.
MD
Mike DawsonOPPOSES4 speeches · 1,568 words
Criticized the bill as a deceptive measure that does not strengthen borders but rather consolidates government control.Bill C-12 does nothing to fix any of this. It is a window dressing for failure.
EL
Eric LefebvreMIXED4 speeches · 1,542 words
Argued that border security is essential for Canadian safety and emphasized the importance of addressing issues related to theft and drug trafficking.Is Bill C‑12 perfect? No, but we are going to work on it and suggest ways to improve it and make it better, because safety is paramount for all Canadians.
Kelly Block
Kelly BlockOPPOSES5 speeches · 1,504 words
Criticized the bill for previous provisions that violated civil liberties.The consistent theme the Liberals have presented to Canadians throughout both Bill C-2 and now Bill C-12 is that they are not willing to be held responsible for the last 10 years they have been in government.
Ziad Aboultaif
Ziad AboultaifSUPPORTS5 speeches · 1,309 words
Argued that Bill C-12 is a necessary step towards fixing immigration and border security issues caused by the current government.Canadians deserve secure borders without sacrificing freedoms.
CA
Chak AuOPPOSES6 speeches · 1,256 words
Criticized the bill for being a rebranded version of previous legislation with no new measures to strengthen border security effectively.Bill C-12 may have removed the most extreme intrusions, but it still reflects the same pattern: overreach, retreat and repackaging.
DG
Dalwinder GillMIXED4 speeches · 1,183 words
Criticized Bill C-12 for not addressing critical issues like meaningful bail reform and mandatory prison sentences for traffickers.Despite the Liberals' tough rhetoric, it still seems that their priority is going after the guns of law-abiding hunters and intercepting the mail of ordinary Canadians.
Garnett Genuis
Garnett GenuisOPPOSES6 speeches · 1,181 words
Criticized the Liberal government's handling of youth unemployment and crime rates, attributing these issues to their policy choices.The reality is that many young people are concerned about what their future will be like because of policies of the Liberal government.
Helena Konanz
Helena KonanzSUPPORTS2 speeches · 1,168 words
Argued that Bill C-12 improves border security measures for communities facing cross-border crime.Bill C-12 is a major improvement over its original form, but only because Conservatives held the government to account.
Eric Melillo
Eric MelilloOPPOSES4 speeches · 469 words
Criticized the Liberal government's failure to address crime and border security issues over the past 10 years.It is important in this discussion that law-abiding Canadians should not lose their liberty to pay for the failures of the Liberals.
Jagsharan Singh Mahal
Jagsharan Singh MahalOPPOSES6 speeches · 425 words
Criticized the absence of minimum mandatory jail time for fentanyl traffickers and gangsters in the bill.There is no minimum mandatory sentence for traffickers in regard to fentanyl. There is no minimum sentence for gangsters.
AL
Andrew LawtonOPPOSES4 speeches · 357 words
Critiqued the government for prioritizing Bill C-2, which he believes infringes on civil liberties.It strikes me as odd that he insists on such urgency for this legislation, when the reason for the delay on Bill C-12 is that the Liberal government was trying to go after Canadian civil liberties with Bill C-2.
Jeff Kibble
Jeff KibbleOPPOSES3 speeches · 342 words
Criticized the lack of equipment and capability for the Coast Guard as mandated by the bill.How do the Liberals intend to have the Coast Guard conduct surveillance missions to collect, process and disseminate secure tactical data?
Jeremy Patzer
Jeremy PatzerOPPOSES3 speeches · 238 words
Criticized the government's poor management of legislation and the House calendar.I could not help but notice that, although we are debating the border bill today, the government already tabled a bill earlier in the current Parliament and has already had to basically withdraw it...
Sandra Cobena
Sandra CobenaOPPOSES4 speeches · 211 words
Criticized the lack of mandatory prison time for fentanyl traffickers under the bill.I would love for my colleague to please comment on that.
Scott Anderson
Scott AndersonOPPOSES5 speeches · 207 words
Argued that the Liberals are not addressing the actual issues related to Bill C-12.The Liberals keep trying to give themselves the power to watch, interfere with and generally babysit Canadians.
Dave Epp
Dave EppNEUTRAL2 speeches · 176 words
Thanked a colleague for their work on behalf of persecuted peoples.Bill C-12 arises from an original bill, Bill C-2, which was tabled in Parliament way back when as part of a large omnibus bill.
Mel Arnold
Mel ArnoldOPPOSES1 speech · 161 words
Criticized the government's handling of border security over the past decade.Would the member say this is an example of the Liberals' failure to address our border security and the drug problem in Canada?
Ned Kuruc
Ned KurucOPPOSES1 speech · 115 words
Criticized the Liberal government for not engaging with Canadians on security issues.Are they stuck in this echo chamber where they believe that by talking to themselves, they will find the answers?
Marc Dalton
Marc DaltonOPPOSES1 speech · 103 words
Argued that the bill erodes rights and freedoms of Canadians.They are concerned that the bills the Liberals are bringing forward are being used to suppress their rights and also increase the power of the state.
SM
Shuvaloy MajumdarOPPOSES1 speech · 92 words
Criticized the government's handling of the asylum system as broken.Many legal experts have suggested that the immigration provisions in the bill are unconstitutional.
LPC29 spoke · 23 support · 2 oppose
Kevin Lamoureux
Kevin LamoureuxSUPPORTS93 speeches · 15,009 words
Argued that Bill C-12 is crucial for securing Canada's borders and stabilizing immigration.Bill C-12 will hopefully garner the support necessary to ultimately get through. It is important to Canadians.
Gary Anandasangaree
Gary AnandasangareeSUPPORTS7 speeches · 2,702 words
Argued that Bill C-12 enhances border security and immigration system integrity.Bill C-12 is important legislation that would keep Canadians safe by strengthening immigration and border security.
AK
Arielle KayabagaSUPPORTS9 speeches · 2,644 words
Argued that Bill C-12 will strengthen Canada's immigration and asylum systems to meet modern challenges.Bill C-12 would ensure that Canada's systems stay strong, credible and compassionate, and protect both our humanitarian obligations and our national interests.
JR
Jacques RamsaySUPPORTS10 speeches · 2,599 words
Argued that Bill C-12 is crucial for modernizing Canada's immigration system and enhancing border security.Bill C-12 goes hand in hand with another bill previously introduced, Bill C-2, the strong borders act.
Marilyn Gladu
Marilyn GladuMIXED8 speeches · 2,107 words
Highlighted concerns about the liberal government's previous immigration bills infringing on civil liberties.It is clear the government continually wants to take away the freedoms of Canadians.
Aslam Rana
Aslam RanaSUPPORTS10 speeches · 1,981 words
Argued that Bill C-12 will strengthen the integrity of Canada's asylum system and ensure fair access for those who need refugee protection.We introduced Bill C-12, the strengthening Canada's immigration system and borders act, to strengthen our borders and keep Canadians safe.
MG
Mark GerretsenSUPPORTS17 speeches · 1,809 words
Argued that misinformation regarding the RCMP and immigration issues is harmful.On this side of the House, we will always stand up for the independence of the agencies of this country, including the RCMP.
Julie Dzerowicz
Julie DzerowiczSUPPORTS5 speeches · 1,680 words
Argued that Bill C-12 provides critical amendments to enhance security and strengthen Canada’s immigration system.The legislation would improve how we would work together to better protect Canadians.
GD
Guillaume Deschênes-ThériaultSUPPORTS5 speeches · 1,671 words
Argued that Bill C-12 addresses long-standing requests from law enforcement for resources to tackle crime.Bill C‑12 addresses some long-standing requests from law enforcement for the necessary resources to crack down on auto theft, drug trafficking and transnational organized crime.
Lena Metlege Diab
Lena Metlege DiabSUPPORTS4 speeches · 1,504 words
Argued that Bill C-12 strengthens Canada's immigration and border system.Our immigration system is one of our greatest strengths. It fuels our economy, builds our communities and reflects who we are as a country.
Caroline Desrochers
Caroline DesrochersSUPPORTS7 speeches · 1,403 words
Argued that the bill addresses stakeholder concerns and narrows its scope for better effectiveness.Canadians expect a robust, efficient and responsive immigration system. The changes we are proposing would strengthen and streamline Canada's asylum and immigration systems.
JN
Juanita NathanSUPPORTS4 speeches · 1,298 words
Argued that Bill C-12 strengthens Canada's security by improving border and immigration laws.I hope that my hon. colleagues from all sides of the House will join me today in supporting Bill C-12.
MC
Michael CoteauSUPPORTS15 speeches · 1,298 words
Argued that building strong relationships with law enforcement, specifically the RCMP, is essential for effective border security.The immigration system is an important aspect of building a strong country.
MM
Michael MaOPPOSES7 speeches · 1,294 words
Criticized Bill C-12 for being ineffective and offering only half measures that fail to address core issues.Bill C-12 is a bundle of half measures that would not secure our borders.
Sukh Dhaliwal
Sukh DhaliwalSUPPORTS5 speeches · 1,250 words
Argued that Bill C-12 would protect Canadians and secure borders in response to evolving global threats.Bill C-12 is built around two pillars. These are securing our borders and combatting organized crime, illegal fentanyl and illicit financing.
AS
Abdelhaq SariSUPPORTS5 speeches · 1,111 words
Argued that Bill C-12 effectively balances compassion and security in the immigration system.This bill strikes a critical balance between a compassionate and a rigorous approach.
Parm Bains
Parm BainsSUPPORTS4 speeches · 1,107 words
Argued that the bill strengthens laws to combat the fentanyl crisis and improve community safety.Together, let us keep our communities and children safe by supporting the bill.
Ron McKinnon
Ron McKinnonSUPPORTS5 speeches · 1,024 words
Argued that Bill C-12 strengthens and streamlines Canada's asylum and immigration systems.The pre-removal risk assessment process embodies this balance.
RS
Ruby SahotaSUPPORTS4 speeches · 335 words
Argued that the bill would provide law enforcement with essential tools to combat organized crime.This bill would help support those in law enforcement and give them the tools they need.
Bardish Chagger
Bardish ChaggerSUPPORTS2 speeches · 262 words
Argued that the legislation is important and necessary for Canadians.Right now, this is an important bill. We do need to try to get it right.
Bienvenu-Olivier Ntumba
Bienvenu-Olivier NtumbaSUPPORTS4 speeches · 258 words
Argued that significant updates have been made to immigration policies by the government.I would like to invite my colleague to once again explain to my colleagues opposite that we have made a lot of major changes with respect to immigration.
Sherry Romanado
Sherry RomanadoNEUTRAL2 speeches · 255 words
Highlighted the importance of committee work in addressing issues for Canadians.the important work that happens in committees can make a real difference for Canadians.
RA
Rebecca AltySUPPORTS1 speech · 226 words
Argued for the inclusion of Canadian citizens and permanent residents in the information-sharing framework established by Bill C-12 to avoid existing inefficiencies.exluding Canadian citizens and permanent residents from these provisions would perpetuate existing inefficiencies, undermine modernization initiatives within the immigration system, and reduce the transparency and accountability that Bill C-12 intends to strengthen.
Wade Chang
Wade ChangNEUTRAL2 speeches · 225 words
Raised a point of order regarding respect in parliamentary committees.Bullying, discrimination, homophobia, racism and hate have no place in the House or in any corner of Canada.
Will Greaves
Will GreavesSUPPORTS2 speeches · 184 words
Acknowledged challenges in cities and the need for focused government policy.Canadians are aware there are challenges in our cities and they have turned to the government and the leadership of the Prime Minister —
John-Paul Danko
John-Paul DankoSUPPORTS2 speeches · 181 words
Highlighted the importance of collaboration in the House for the benefit of all Canadians.It is really encouraging to see collaboration in the House, where we can hash something out at committee and come to a level of agreement for the best interest of all Canadians.
Doug Eyolfson
Doug EyolfsonMIXED2 speeches · 171 words
Argued that addressing crime is crucial due to personal experience and professional background.I found the statements in his speech rather incongruous.
JD
John-Paul DankoOPPOSES1 speech · 113 words
Criticized the Conservative Party's anti-immigration rhetoric as damaging to democracy.This rhetoric is damaging. It is damaging to our democracy. It is damaging to Canadians.
Ginette Petitpas Taylor
Ginette Petitpas TaylorSUPPORTS1 speech · 99 words
Argued that the bill is important for recognizing the hard work of law enforcement agencies like the RCMP.Having worked for the RCMP for 23 years as a civilian member, I have seen the hard work of the many women of the RCMP, day in and day out.
BQ17 spoke · 3 support · 2 oppose
Claude DeBellefeuille
Claude DeBellefeuilleMIXED16 speeches · 5,782 words
Argued that while Bill C-12 has some good measures, it still contains troubling elements that could violate privacy rights.The most problematic parts of Bill C‑2, namely, the privacy invasions, were taken out of Bill C‑12.
Maxime Blanchette-Joncas
Maxime Blanchette-JoncasMIXED17 speeches · 3,698 words
Supported the intent of the bill to enhance border security but criticized the government's lack of concrete action.Trust is built with actions, not intentions. Right now, we are constantly being fed recycled statements.
Andréanne Larouche
Andréanne LaroucheMIXED14 speeches · 3,140 words
Criticized the lack of adequate resources and personnel for border security agencies.I have had lunch with insurance company officials, and I can say that this is a real problem. They want us to deal with the situation.
Alexis Deschênes
Alexis DeschênesSUPPORTS11 speeches · 2,647 words
Argued that Bill C-12 addresses legitimate concerns about the integrity of the immigration process.We support Bill C-12, with the amendments that have been made.
Alexis Brunelle-Duceppe
Alexis Brunelle-DuceppeMIXED8 speeches · 2,622 words
Argued that while Bill C-12 is a step in the right direction, it fails to address the staffing shortages at CBSA and RCMP.The Bloc Québécois believes that with Bill C-12, the government is indeed taking a step in the right direction. However, we also believe that this bill, if passed, leaves one major problem unaddressed, and that is the staffing shortage at the CBSA and the RCMP.
Xavier Barsalou-Duval
Xavier Barsalou-DuvalMIXED8 speeches · 2,382 words
Argued that the bill includes positive provisions for combating fraudulent asylum claims.Bill C-12 is a step in the right direction. It will help improve the system.
MC
Martin ChampouxMIXED8 speeches · 1,164 words
Argued that while Bill C-12 represents a step in the right direction, the government's failure to hire enough border services officers remains a critical issue.I understand why the Liberals and the Conservatives are squabbling, but I still think that there are some worthwhile aspects to Bill C-12.
MS
Mario SimardMIXED8 speeches · 1,023 words
Criticized the government's decision to overturn committee amendments, arguing it undermines democratic processes.It is unfortunate that the government has decided to set aside certain amendments.
Luc Thériault
Luc ThériaultMIXED5 speeches · 358 words
Highlighted concerns about the effectiveness of the bill due to insufficient border officer resources.A bill is only good insofar as it can be effective on the ground.
Yves Perron
Yves PerronSUPPORTS5 speeches · 346 words
Argued that strengthening border security is important due to issues like human smuggling networks.We feel that strengthening border security is important. Of course, it needs to be done right.
Jean-Denis Garon
Jean-Denis GaronMIXED2 speeches · 331 words
Argued that Bill C-12 had fewer irritants compared to the previous Bill C-2.Bill C‑12 is the new version of Bill C‑2, with fewer irritants.
Gabriel Ste-Marie
Gabriel Ste-MarieSUPPORTS3 speeches · 306 words
Argued the need for more border services officers to effectively enforce the law.The Customs and Immigration Union is asking Ottawa to allow border services officers to patrol between border crossings, not to replace the RCMP, but rather to give federal agencies more depth and flexibility in enforcing the law.
Rhéal Éloi Fortin
Rhéal Éloi FortinMIXED3 speeches · 291 words
Argued that while the bill strengthens border security principles, practical implementation challenges remain.Mr. Speaker, I agree with the principles of the bill, but how are we going to implement it?
Mario Beaulieu
Mario BeaulieuMIXED3 speeches · 254 words
Highlighted concerns about the adequacy of border officer numbers, citing a need for 2,000 to 3,000 more officers.We are pleased that Bill C‑12 is doing away with the most problematic elements of Bill C‑2 with regard to privacy violations.
Simon-Pierre Savard-Tremblay
Simon-Pierre Savard-TremblayMIXED2 speeches · 216 words
Argued that there is a staffing problem within the Canada Border Services Agency.It is time to do it. I am not minimizing the issue. There is a staffing problem; there is a staff shortage.
SL
Sébastien LemireOPPOSES1 speech · 138 words
Criticized the removal of mail searches and privacy invasions, questioning the government's decision.I do not think anyone wanted to see them in a bill.
PB
Patrick BoninOPPOSES2 speeches · 122 words
Criticized Bill C-12 for not addressing the critical shortage of Canada Border Services Agency officers.According to the union, the Canada Border Services Agency is short between 2,000 and 3,000 officers.
Legislative stages
  1. First reading (House of Commons)
    Oct 8, 2025
  2. Second reading (House of Commons)
    Oct 23, 2025
  3. First reading (Senate)
    Dec 11, 2025
  4. Third reading (House of Commons)
    Dec 11, 2025
  5. Second reading (Senate)
    Feb 5, 2026
  6. Third reading (Senate)
    Mar 12, 2026
  7. Royal Assent
    Mar 26, 2026