← Your dashboard·HoC · 45-1passed
Official record· LEGISinfoHouse of Commons · Bill C-19

C-19 · Canada Groceries and Essentials Benefit Act

An Act to amend the Income Tax Act

Introduced Jan 28, 2026·Sponsor: François-Philippe ChampagneLPCMEDIUM
AI-assisted analysis
At a glance
  • Increases annual GST/HST credit by 50% for 2025-2026.
  • Boosts annual GST/HST credit by 25% from 2026-2031.
  • Applies to eligible individuals who file income tax returns.
Low-income individualsFamilies with dependentsShared-custody parents
AI-assisted analysis
What's actually in this bill
Full billTax benefits for eligible individuals
What it does

This part of the bill creates tax payments that eligible individuals can receive starting in January 2026, continuing through April 2031, based on their income and number of dependents. It establishes formulas to calculate these payments and includes specific provisions for shared-custody parents.

Why it matters

This matters because it provides financial support to individuals and families, potentially easing their economic burden during a specified timeframe. It aims to assist those who may struggle to afford groceries and essentials.

The problem it addresses

The bill addresses financial difficulties faced by individuals and families, particularly in light of rising living costs.

Who benefits

Eligible individuals and families, particularly those with dependents or who are shared-custody parents, will benefit from these tax payments.

The tradeoff

The cost of these benefits may result in reduced fiscal resources for public services, impacting overall government funding and potentially leading to budget reallocations;

eligible individualsfamilies with dependentsshared-custody parentstaxpayersincome earners
Read the actual text (6)
Short title

1This Act may be cited as the Canada Groceries and Essentials Benefit Act .

2Subsection 117.1(2) of the Income Tax Act is amended by adding the following after paragraph (m): (m.1) each of the amounts expressed in dollars in subsection 122.5(3.005), for a taxation year that begins after 2026;

Additional deemed payment — January 2026

3(1) Section 122.5 of the Act is amended by adding the following after subsection (3.003): (3.004) An eligible individual in relation to a month specified for a taxation year who files a return of income for the taxation year is deemed to have paid during the specified month on account of their tax payable under this Part for the taxation year an amount determined by the formula 0.25 × (A − B) − C where A is the total of (a) $1,047, (b) $1,047 for the qualified relation, if any, of the individual in relation to the specified month, (c) if the individual has no qualified relation in relation to the specified month and is entitled to deduct an amount for the taxation year under subsection 118(1) because of paragraph (b) of the description of B in that subsection in respect of a qualified dependant of the individual in relation to the specified month, $1,047, (d) $552 times the number of qualified dependants of the individual in relation to the specified month, other than a qualified dependant in respect of whom an amount is included under paragraph (c) in computing the total for the specified month, (e) if the individual has no qualified relation and has one or more qualified dependants, in relation to the specified month, $552, and (f) if the individual has no qualified relation and no qualified dependant, in relation to the specified month, the lesser of $552 and 6% of the amount, if any, by which the individual’s income for the taxation year exceeds $11,337; B is 15% of the amount, if any, by which the individual’s adjusted income for the taxation year exceeds $45,521; and C is the amount that the eligible individual is deemed to have paid under subsection (3) during the specified month on account of their tax payable for the taxation year. Additional deemed payment — July 2026 to April 2031 (3.005) An eligible individual in relation to a month specified for a taxation year who files a return of income for the taxation year is deemed to have paid during the specified month on account of their tax payable under this Part for the taxation year an amount equal to 1/4 of the amount, if any, determined by the formula A − B where A is the total of (a) $445, (b) $445 for the qualified relation, if any, of the individual in relation to the specified month, (c) if the individual has no qualified relation in relation to the specified month and is entitled to deduct an amount for the taxation year under subsection 118(1) because of paragraph (b) of the description of B in that subsection in respect of a qualified dependant of the individual in relation to the specified month, $445, (d) $234 times the number of qualified dependants of the individual in relation to the specified month, other than a qualified dependant in respect of whom an amount is included under paragraph (c) in computing the total for the specified month, (e) if the individual has no qualified relation and has one or more qualified dependants, in relation to the specified month, $234, and (f) if the individual has no qualified relation and no qualified dependant, in relation to the specified month, the lesser of $234 and 2% of the amount, if any, by which the individual’s income for the taxation year exceeds $11,564; and B is 5% of the amount, if any, by which the individual’s adjusted income for the taxation year in relation to the specified month exceeds $46,432. (2) Section 122.5 of the Act is amended by adding the following after subsection (3.04): January 2026 payment — shared-custody parent (3.05) Notwithstanding subsection (3.004), if an eligible individual is a shared-custody parent (as defined in section 122.6, with reference to the term “qualified dependant” read as a reference to that term as defined in subsection (1)) in respect of one or more qualified dependants at the beginning of a month, the amount deemed by subsection (3.004) to have been paid during the specified month is equal to the amount determined by the formula 0.5 × (A + B) where A is the amount determined by the formula in subsection (3.004), calculated without reference to this subsection; and B is the amount determined by the formula in subsection (3.004), calculated without reference to this subsection and subparagraph (b)(ii) of the definition eligible individual in section 122.6. July 2026 to April 2031 payments — shared-custody parent (3.06) Notwithstanding subsection (3.005), if an eligible individual is a shared-custody parent (as defined in section 122.6, with reference to the term “qualified dependant” read as a reference to that term as defined in subsection (1)) in respect of one or more qualified dependants at the beginning of a month, the amount deemed by subsection (3.005) to have been paid during the specified month is equal to the amount determined by the formula 0.5 × (A + B) where A is the amount determined by the formula in subsection (3.005), calculated without reference to this subsection; and B is the amount determined by the formula in subsection (3.005), calculated without reference to this subsection and subparagraph (b)(ii) of the definition eligible individual in section 122.6. (3) Subsection 122.5(3.2) of the Act is replaced by the following: Advance payment (3.2) If this subsection applies, the total of the amounts that would otherwise be deemed by subsections (3) and (3.005) to have been paid on account of the eligible individual’s tax payable under this Part for the taxation year during the particular month specified for the taxation year, and during each subsequent month specified for the taxation year, is deemed to have been paid by the eligible individual on account of their tax payable under this Part for the taxation year during the particular specified month for the taxation year, and the amount deemed by subsections (3) and (3.005) to have been paid by the eligible individual during those subsequent months specified for the taxation year is deemed, except for the purpose of this subsection, not to have been paid to the extent that it is included in an amount deemed to have been paid by this subsection. (4) Section 122.5 of the Act is amended by adding the following after subsection (4.3): January 2026 — month specified (4.4) Notwithstanding subsection (4) and for the purposes of this section, the month specified in subsection (3.004) is January 2026 and the taxation year is the 2024 taxation year. July 2026 to April 2031 — month specified (4.5) Notwithstanding subsection (4) and for the purposes of this section, the months specified in subsection (3.005) are July 2026, October 2026, January 2027, April 2027, July 2027, October 2027, January 2028, April 2028, July 2028, October 2028, January 2029, April 2029, July 2029, October 2029, January 2030, April 2030, July 2030, October 2030, January 2031 and April 2031, and if the month specified is July or October, the taxation year for the month specified is the immediately preceding taxation year and if the month specified is January or April, the taxation year for the month specified is the second preceding taxation year. Subsection (3) does not apply — month specified (4.6) Notwithstanding subsection (3), the amount that an eligible individual in relation to a month specified in subsection (4.5) is deemed to have paid during the specified month on account of their tax payable under this Part for the taxation year under subsection (3) is deemed to be nil for that specified month.

4(1) Paragraph 152(1)(b) of the Act is replaced by the following: (b) the amount of tax, if any, deemed by any of subsections 120(2) or (2.2), 122.5(3) to (3.005) , 122.51(2), 122.7(2) or (3), 122.‍72(1), 122.8(4), 122.9(2), 122.91(1), 125.4(3), 125.5(3), 125.6(2) or (2.1), 127.1(1), 127.41(3), 127.44(2), 127.45(2), 127.48(2), 127.49(2) or 210.2(3) or (4) to be paid on account of the taxpayer’s tax payable under this Part for the year. (2) Paragraph 152(1.2)(d) of the Act is replaced by the following: (d) the Minister determines the amount deemed by any of subsections 122.5(3) to (3.005) , 122.‍72(1) or 122.8(4) to have been paid by an individual for a taxation year to be nil, subsection (2) does not apply to the determination unless the individual requests a notice of determination from the Minister. (3) Paragraph 152(4.2)(b) of the Act is replaced by the following: (b) redetermine the amount, if any, deemed by any of subsections 120(2) or (2.2), 122.5(3) to (3.005) , 122.51(2), 122.7(2) or (3), 122.8(4), 122.9(2), 122.91(1), 127.1(1), 127.41(3) or 210.2(3) or (4) to be paid on account of the taxpayer’s tax payable under this Part for the year or deemed by subsection 122.61(1) to be an overpayment on account of the taxpayer’s liability under this Part for the year.

5Paragraph 160.1(1.1)(b) of the Act is replaced by the following: (b) the total of the amounts deemed by any of subsections 122.5(3) or (3.002) to (3.005) to have been paid by the individual during those specified months.

Bill C-15

6(1) Subsections (2) to (6) apply if Bill C-15, introduced in the 1st session of the 45th Parliament and entitled the Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 1 (in this section referred to as the “other Act”), receives royal assent. (2) Paragraph 152(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act , as enacted by subsection 4 (1) of this Act, is replaced by the following: (b) the amount of tax, if any, deemed by any of subsections 120(2) or (2.2), 122.5(3) to (3.005), 122.51(2), 122.7(2) or (3), 122.72(1), 122.8(4), 122.9(2), 122.91(1), 122.92(3), 122.93(2), 125.4(3), 125.5(3), 125.6(2) or (2.1), 127.1(1), 127.41(3), 127.42(2) or (3), 127.421(2) or (3), 127.44(2), 127.45(2), 127.48(2), 127.49(2), 127.491(2) or 210.2(3) or (4) to be paid on account of the taxpayer’s tax payable under this Part for the year. (3) Paragraph 152(1.2)(d) of the Income Tax Act , as enacted by subsection 4 (2) of this Act, is replaced by the following: (d) the Minister determines the amount deemed by any of subsections 122.5(3) to (3.005), 122.72(1), 122.8(4) or 127.421(2) or (3) to have been paid by a person for a taxation year to be nil, subsection (2) does not apply to the determination unless the person requests a notice of determination from the Minister. (4) Paragraph 152(4.2)(b) of the Income Tax Act , as enacted by subsection 4 (3) of this Act, is replaced by the following: (b) redetermine the amount, if any, deemed by any of subsections 120(2) or (2.2), 122.5(3) to (3.005), 122.51(2), 122.7(2) or (3), 122.8(4), 122.9(2), 122.91(1), 122.92(3), 122.93(2), 127.1(1), 127.41(3) or 210.2(3) or (4) to be paid on account of the taxpayer’s tax payable under this Part for the year or deemed by subsection 122.61(1) to be an overpayment on account of the taxpayer’s liability under this Part for the year. (5) Paragraph 152(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act , as enacted by subsection (2), comes into force on the day on which this Act receives royal assent, except that, for the period beginning on January 1, 2026 and ending on the day immediately before the day on which this Act receives royal assent, that paragraph is to be read as follows: (b) the amount of tax, if any, deemed by any of subsections 120(2) or (2.2), 122.5(3) to (3.003), 122.51(2), 122.7(2) or (3), 122.72(1), 122.8(4), 122.9(2), 122.91(1), 122.92(3), 125.4(3), 125.5(3), 125.6(2) or (2.1), 127.1(1), 127.41(3), 127.42(2) or (3), 127.421(2) or (3), 127.44(2), 127.45(2), 127.48(2), 127.49(2), 127.491(2) or 210.2(3) or (4) to be paid on account of the taxpayer’s tax payable under this Part for the year. (6) Paragraph 152(4.2)(b) of the Income Tax Act , as enacted by subsection (4), comes into force on the day on which this Act receives royal assent, except that, for the period beginning on January 1, 2026 and ending on the day immediately before the day on which this Act receives royal assent, that paragraph is to be read as follows: (b) redetermine the amount, if any, deemed by any of subsections 120(2) or (2.2), 122.5(3) to (3.003), 122.51(2), 122.7(2) or (3), 122.8(4), 122.9(2), 122.91(1), 122.92(3), 122.93(2), 127.1(1), 127.41(3) or 210.2(3) or (4) to be paid on account of the taxpayer’s tax payable under this Part for the year or deemed by subsection 122.61(1) to be an overpayment on account of the taxpayer’s liability under this Part for the year.

Official record· parl.ca
Official drafter summary (parl.ca)

This enactment amends the Income Tax Act in order to increase the maximum annual Goods and Services Tax/Harmonized Sales Tax credit (GSTC) amounts by 50% for the 2025-2026 benefit year. It also amends that Act to increase the maximum annual GSTC amounts by 25% as of the 2026-2027 benefit year for a period of five years. Available on the House of Commons website at the following address: www.ourcommons.ca 3 - 4 Charles III CHAPTER 1 An Act to amend the Income Tax Act [ Assented to 12th February, 2026 ] His Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate and House of Commons of Canada, enacts as follows: Short Title Short title 1 This Act may be cited as the Canada Groceries and Essentials Benefit Act . R.‍S.‍, c. 1 (5th Supp.‍) Income Tax Act 2 Subsection 117.‍1 ( 2 ) of the Income Tax Act is amended by adding the following after paragraph (m): (m.‍ 1 ) each of the amounts expressed in dollars in subsection 122.‍5 ( 3.‍005 ), for a taxation year that begins after 2026 ; 3 ( 1 ) Section 122.‍5 of the Act is amended by adding the following after subsection ( 3.‍003 ): Additional deemed payment — January 2026 ( 3.‍004 ) An eligible individual in relation to a month specified for a taxation year who files a return of income for the taxation year is deemed to have paid during the specified month on account of their tax payable under this Part for the taxation year an amount determined by the formula 0.‍25 × (A − B) − C where A is the total of (a) $ 1,047, (b) $ 1,047 for the qualified relation, if any, of the individual in relation to the specified month, (c) if the individual has no qualified relation in relation to the specified month and is entitled to deduct an amount for the taxation year under subsection 118 ( 1 ) because of paragraph (b) of the description of B in that subsection in respect of a qualified dependant of the individual in relation to the specified month, $ 1,047, (d) $ 552 times the number of qualified dependants of the individual in relation to the specified month, other than a qualified dependant in respect of whom an amount is included under paragraph (c) in computing the total for the specified month, (e) if the individual has no qualified relation and has one or more qualified dependants, in relation to the specified month, $ 552, and (f) if the individual has no qualified relation and no qualified dependant, in relation to the specified month, the lesser of $ 552 and 6 % of the amount, if any, by which the individual’s income for the taxation year exceeds $ 11,337 ; B is 15 % of the amount, if any, by which the individual’s adjusted income for the taxation year exceeds $ 45,521 ; and C is the amount that the eligible individual is deemed to have paid under subsection ( 3 ) during the specified month on account of their tax payable for the taxation year. Additional deemed payment — July 2026 to April 2031 ( 3.‍005 ) An eligible individual in relation to a month specified for a taxation year who files a return of income for the taxation year is deemed to have paid during the specified month on account of their tax payable under this Part for the taxation year an amount equal to 1 / 4 of the amount, if any, determined by the formula A − B where A is the total of (a) $ 445, (b) $ 445 for the qualified relation, if any, of the individual in relation to the specified month, (c) if the individual has no qualified relation in relation to the specified month and is entitled to deduct an amount for the taxation year under subsection 118 ( 1 ) because of paragraph (b) of the description of B in that subsection in respect of a qualified dependant of the individual in relation to the specified month, $ 445, (d) $ 234 times the number of qualified dependants of the individual in relation to the specified month, other than a qualified dependant in respect of whom an amount is included under paragraph (c) in computing the total for the specified month, (e) if the individual has no qualified relation and has one or more qualified dependants, in relation to the specified month, $ 234, and (f) if the individual has no qualified relation and no qualified dependant, in relation to the specified month, the lesser of $ 234 and 2 % of the amount, if any, by which the individual’s income for the taxation year exceeds $ 11,564 ; and B is 5 % of the amount, if any, by which the individual’s adjusted income for the taxation year in relation to the specified month exceeds $ 46,432. ( 2 ) Section 122.‍5 of the Act is amended by adding the following after subsection ( 3.‍04 ): January 2026 payment — shared-custody parent ( 3.‍05 ) Notwithstanding subsection ( 3.‍004 ), if an eligible individual is a shared-custody parent (as defined in section 122.‍6, with reference to the term “qualified dependant” read as a reference to that term as defined in subsection ( 1 )) in respect of one or more qualified dependants at the beginning of a month, the amount deemed by subsection ( 3.‍004 ) to have been paid during...

AI-assisted analysis
What MPs debatedCONTESTED185 speeches · 55 MPs · 48,291 words
Points of contention
  • Disagreement over the effectiveness of the proposed GST credit increase
  • Debate on the distribution method of financial aid (monthly vs. quarterly)
  • Concerns about the sustainability of measures after the initial duration of support
  • Questions regarding the timing and intent behind the bill's introduction

The Liberals largely supported the bill, while Conservatives and Bloc Québécois raised concerns about its effectiveness and sustainability.

Where MPs stood52 MPs · grouped by party · ranked by speaking volume
AI-assisted analysis
CPC25 spoke · 4 support · 18 oppose
Eric Duncan
Eric DuncanOPPOSES4 speeches · 2,233 words
Criticized the government for failing to address increasing grocery prices and for creating an $80-billion deficit.It is a damning indictment of the record of Liberal governments after 10 years in office.
CA
Carol AnsteySUPPORTS4 speeches · 1,770 words
Argued that supporting Bill C-19 is necessary to provide immediate relief to Canadians struggling with rising food costs, despite its shortcomings.Supporting the bill does not mean ignoring its shortcomings or pretending that this half measure is a response to a serious problem that is facing Canadians.
Jasraj Hallan
Jasraj HallanOPPOSES6 speeches · 1,664 words
Criticized the government's handling of food inflation, claiming it is the highest in the G7 due to Liberal policies.We have the highest food inflation in the G7 after they supposedly worked hard.
Ellis Ross
Ellis RossSUPPORTS4 speeches · 1,643 words
Argued that Bill C-19 is necessary to alleviate financial pain for Canadians struggling to afford groceries and bills.Conservatives will be supporting Bill C-19 mainly to try to stop some of the pain Canadians are going through.
Jacques Gourde
Jacques GourdeOPPOSES5 speeches · 1,598 words
Criticized the bill as a reflection of the Liberal government's failure to manage the economy and reduce the tax burden on Canadians.Bill C‑19 is the very definition of an idea that only looks good on paper.
FT
Fraser TolmieSUPPORTS4 speeches · 1,593 words
Argued that Bill C-19 will provide necessary immediate relief for families struggling with grocery costs.Conservatives will support Bill C-19, because families need help right now.
GM
Greg McLeanMIXED4 speeches · 1,580 words
Argued that the bill would ease food costs for some Canadians but criticized it for not addressing the root causes of inflation.The agenda of managing decline is not the answer. We need to turn this around and make Canada a more prosperous nation again.
Sandra Cobena
Sandra CobenaSUPPORTS4 speeches · 1,480 words
Argued that the temporary groceries and essentials benefit is necessary to help families struggling with food insecurity.Given the magnitude of the food affordability crisis, I support this temporary groceries and essentials benefit to lift families who are struggling.
Leslyn Lewis
Leslyn LewisOPPOSES5 speeches · 1,389 words
Argued that Bill C-19 does not address the root causes of high food prices and merely offers rebates after prices have already increased.Canadians need relief that lasts. They want their dignity back, and they do not want their survival to be based on government subsidies.
Jagsharan Singh Mahal
Jagsharan Singh MahalMIXED4 speeches · 1,370 words
Supported the GST rebate as immediate relief for struggling families, but criticized it as temporary.While Conservatives will support the bill, the bill itself is not enough, and we will continue to fight against inflationary Liberal policies and work for Canadians.
Warren Steinley
Warren SteinleyOPPOSES7 speeches · 732 words
Argued that the bill signifies Liberal failure on grocery price inflation.If this was such an important initiative, why was it not in their fall budget?
Garnett Genuis
Garnett GenuisOPPOSES2 speeches · 220 words
Argued that the government's policies are causing high food prices.It is striking that what Liberals are offering is, 'We've got all these new programs,' but the reality on the ground is that... food prices,... continue to go up.
Tako Van Popta
Tako Van PoptaOPPOSES2 speeches · 204 words
Criticized the government's approach to economic issues, arguing they only address symptoms rather than underlying problems.the introduction of this legislation is really an admission of failure.
Lianne Rood
Lianne RoodOPPOSES1 speech · 174 words
Criticized government policies contributing to high food prices.The root cause of all the food price increases in Canada is directly related to government policies.
Todd Doherty
Todd DohertyOPPOSES1 speech · 155 words
Criticized the government's approach to the bill as ineffective.I am hearing on the ground in Cariboo—Prince George that this benefit would essentially be just a coupon.
AR
Alex RuffOPPOSES1 speech · 136 words
Argued that the measures proposed in the bill are a short-term relief rather than a long-term solution.this was not part of the federal budget...now all of a sudden the Liberals are finding another $12 billion to give this sort of short-term relief...
Jeremy Patzer
Jeremy PatzerOPPOSES1 speech · 133 words
Argued that the bill does not effectively lower grocery costs.Conservatives certainly support the concept of helping people be able to buy those groceries, but the bill would not actually lower the cost of groceries.
Ted Falk
Ted FalkOPPOSES1 speech · 118 words
Criticized the government's approach to addressing affordability issues.There is a much simpler way to address the problem than just another social program...
BZ
Bob ZimmerOPPOSES1 speech · 107 words
Criticized the Prime Minister for increasing national debt in comparison to his predecessor.Justin Trudeau was going to add $154 billion to our debt over the next five years. The current Prime Minister is adding $321 billion to our debt over the next five years, and this new program is going to add another $12.4 billion to that debt.
PK
Pat KellyOPPOSES1 speech · 105 words
Criticized the finance minister for not answering questions about the bill.It was a shameful display from a minister unwilling to answer questions and explain his bill to Canadians.
CA
Chak AuOPPOSES1 speech · 102 words
Argued that short-term relief measures do not solve structural problems.I want to challenge the government to provide one example of these kinds of measures creating long-term, sustainable and measurable reductions in grocery prices.
Cathay Wagantall
Cathay WagantallOPPOSES1 speech · 101 words
Criticized the government for creating problems and offering short-term solutions.the Liberals claim they care, yet they create a problem and end up coming up with a solution for it that is short term.
AL
Andrew LawtonOPPOSES1 speech · 91 words
Criticized the government's messaging on the carbon tax as contradictory.Was she misleading then, or is she misleading now?
Kelly DeRidder
Kelly DeRidderMIXED1 speech · 90 words
Argued that the tax credit proposed in Bill C-19 will only benefit less than 30% of the population.less than 30% of the population will actually be supported by this.
MK
Michael KramOPPOSES1 speech · 81 words
Criticized the government's focus on specific benefits over broad-based solutions.Why not adopt policies that will bring down the cost of groceries for all Canadians...
LPC15 spoke · 15 support · 0 oppose
FC
François-Philippe ChampagneSUPPORTS10 speeches · 2,702 words
Argued that the Canada groceries and essentials benefit is crucial for helping families with rising food costs.The Canada groceries and essentials benefit will deliver real help to Canadians who are struggling with the cost of groceries and everyday essentials.
GD
Guillaume Deschênes-ThériaultSUPPORTS8 speeches · 2,559 words
Highlighted the importance of the cost of living and affordability for Canadians.Bill C-19 will help us support Canadians while we wait for the effects of our transformative changes to the economy to take place.
Kevin Lamoureux
Kevin LamoureuxSUPPORTS11 speeches · 2,209 words
Argued that Bill C-19 is a genuine attempt to assist Canadians with grocery affordability.Ultimately, I believe this is the most effective way for the government to support grocery relief for Canadians.
AK
Arielle KayabagaSUPPORTS5 speeches · 1,998 words
Argued that passing the bill quickly will address the urgent needs of Canadians facing financial hardships.This is a game-changer. We know there are so many families that are not receiving the supports they need because they either are not able to file or have not been in the right spaces to learn how to file their taxes.
Steeve Lavoie
Steeve LavoieSUPPORTS6 speeches · 1,790 words
Argued that Bill C-19 provides essential financial support to Canadians facing rising costs of living, particularly through the Canada groceries and essentials benefit.Bill C-19 was designed with them and millions of others across the country in mind.
Brendan Hanley
Brendan HanleySUPPORTS5 speeches · 1,547 words
Argued that Canadians are facing rising costs, and Bill C-19 provides essential support to alleviate these challenges.I will therefore encourage my colleagues to support Bill C-19, so we can roll it out as soon as possible.
JN
Juanita NathanSUPPORTS5 speeches · 1,338 words
Argued that the bill is timely and necessary to provide immediate financial relief to low and moderate-income Canadians.I urge all hon. members to pass Bill C-19 without delay so we can ensure that Canadians get this much-needed relief as soon as possible.
AI
Angelo IaconoSUPPORTS5 speeches · 1,223 words
Argued that Bill C-19 is a pragmatic solution providing immediate financial relief to Canadians.I therefore urge all members to support Bill C-19 in order to offer tangible relief to Canadians.
Ron McKinnon
Ron McKinnonSUPPORTS5 speeches · 1,199 words
Argued that Bill C-19 will provide significant financial assistance to over 12 million low- and modest-income Canadians for essentials.I urge all hon. members to pass Bill C-19 without delay, so that we can ensure Canadians get this much-needed relief as soon as possible.
Bardish Chagger
Bardish ChaggerSUPPORTS2 speeches · 330 words
Argued that the bill demonstrates the House can function for constituents.The legislation would benefit the constituents in the riding of Waterloo.
Caroline Desrochers
Caroline DesrochersSUPPORTS2 speeches · 303 words
Argued that opposition parties are contradicting themselves by voting against affordability measures while claiming more needs to be done.It is a shame that she calls the Canada groceries and essentials benefit a marketing ploy.
Iqra Khalid
Iqra KhalidSUPPORTS2 speeches · 192 words
Highlighted the importance of addressing food insecurity in communities.This benefit would absolutely help ensure that people are able to keep food on the table.
DO
Dominique O'RourkeSUPPORTS1 speech · 145 words
Argued for the productivity superdeduction as beneficial for food processors.I am perplexed that the members opposite have voted against the productivity superdeduction in budget 2025 that will allow food processors to immediately deduct new equipment or new buildings.
John-Paul Danko
John-Paul DankoSUPPORTS1 speech · 126 words
Highlighted the importance of addressing affordability issues for families and seniors.A credit of $7,500 over five years is substantial assistance...
Patrick Weiler
Patrick WeilerSUPPORTS1 speech · 112 words
Thanked a colleague for their support of Bill C-19.We have seen in the last year that gas prices have actually been reduced in Canada by about 17% to 20%.
BQ10 spoke · 3 support · 3 oppose
Jean-Denis Garon
Jean-Denis GaronMIXED13 speeches · 4,271 words
Argued that while the bill provides immediate support to families facing high living costs, a more permanent solution is needed.As I said, we support the bill because times are hard and food inflation is real...
Marilène Gill
Marilène GillOPPOSES4 speeches · 2,042 words
Criticized the bill as a marketing ploy rather than a genuine solution for struggling Canadians.However, I must say that this is an excellent example of how the measure fails to meet the needs of people back home who work in seasonal industries.
Andréanne Larouche
Andréanne LaroucheMIXED5 speeches · 2,000 words
Supported the bill in principle, acknowledging the necessary relief provided to Canadians.Of course we will be supporting Bill C‑19, because people need help. However, we in the Bloc Québécois would like to point out that this assistance is insufficient, poorly structured.
Gabriel Ste-Marie
Gabriel Ste-MarieSUPPORTS5 speeches · 655 words
Argued that the measure will help those in need.the Bloc Québécois strongly supports this measure. It will help those who need it.
Alexis Deschênes
Alexis DeschênesSUPPORTS4 speeches · 539 words
Argued that the state going into debt may be more beneficial than increasing household debt.The Bloc Québécois will support Bill C‑19.
MC
Martin ChampouxMIXED3 speeches · 465 words
Argued for the necessity of Bill C-19 to support families during difficult financial times.We consider it necessary because of the imperative need to support Quebeckers and Canadians through the extremely harsh financial circumstances facing families.
SL
Sébastien LemireOPPOSES2 speeches · 313 words
Criticized the government's impact on national debt, highlighting an expected additional $12.4 billion debt.What will happen in 2031? Inflation will have eaten away at everyone's income and people will not have a penny left.
Claude DeBellefeuille
Claude DeBellefeuilleSUPPORTS2 speeches · 311 words
Stated that the Bloc Québécois will support Bill C-19.I think he knows full well that the Bloc Québécois will support Bill C-19.
Mario Beaulieu
Mario BeaulieuOPPOSES3 speeches · 286 words
Criticized the government's support for the oil industry and its impact on climate change.It is a one-time cheque, which means that it is clear it is a vote-buying scheme.
Maxime Blanchette-Joncas
Maxime Blanchette-JoncasMIXED2 speeches · 250 words
Supported the measure designed to help vulnerable individuals.However, I would like to remind the minister what he said a few months ago.
Legislative stages
  1. First reading (House of Commons)
    Jan 28, 2026
  2. Second reading (House of Commons)
    Feb 2, 2026
  3. Third reading (House of Commons)
    Feb 4, 2026
  4. First reading (Senate)
    Feb 5, 2026
  5. Second reading (Senate)
    Feb 10, 2026
  6. Third reading (Senate)
    Feb 12, 2026
  7. Royal Assent
    Feb 12, 2026