← Your dashboard·HoC · 45-1passed
Official record· LEGISinfoHouse of Commons · Bill C-225

C-225

An Act to amend the Criminal Code

Introduced Sep 18, 2025·Sponsor: Frank CaputoCPCMEDIUM
AI-assisted analysis
At a glance
  • Creates a new offence of first-degree murder for killing an intimate partner amid controlling behavior.
  • Requires courts to consider life imprisonment for manslaughter against an intimate partner under similar conditions.
  • Establishes new offences for violence threatened or used against intimate partners.
  • Increases the detention period for seized items related to these offences from three months to 180 days.
Intimate partnersDomestic violence victimsCriminal offenders
AI-assisted analysis
What's actually in this bill
Full billStricter laws on intimate partner violence
What it does

This bill introduces new offenses and harsher penalties for various forms of violence and harassment against intimate partners, including murder, assault, and making threats. It also mandates risk assessments for individuals accused of violence against their partners.

Why it matters

This legislation aims to enhance the protection of intimate partners from violence and harassment, potentially reducing domestic violence rates in Canada. It addresses serious crimes that can have devastating impacts on victims and their families.

The problem it addresses

The bill seeks to fill legal gaps in the recognition and prosecution of intimate partner violence and harassment.

Who benefits

Survivors of intimate partner violence benefit from stronger legal protections and increased accountability for offenders.

The tradeoff

Opponents of the measures may argue that the increase in mandatory detention and harsher penalties could lead to unfair consequences for those falsely accused or those without access to proper legal representation, thereby increasing the burden on individuals accused of such crimes.

victims of domestic violenceintimate partnerslaw enforcementjudicial systemdomestic violence offenders
Read the actual text (9)
Murder of intimate partner

1Section 231 of the Criminal Code is amended by adding the following after subsection (3): (3.1) Irrespective of whether a murder is planned and deliberate on the part of any person, murder is first degree murder when the victim is that person’s intimate partner.

Criminal harassment of intimate partner

2The Act is amended by adding the following after section 264: 264.01 (1) No person shall, without lawful authority and knowing that their intimate partner is harassed or being reckless as to whether their intimate partner is harassed, engage in any of the following conduct that causes their intimate partner reasonably, in all the circumstances, to fear for their safety or the safety of anyone known to their intimate partner: (a) repeatedly following from place to place their intimate partner or anyone known to them; (b) repeatedly communicating with, either directly or indirectly, their intimate partner or anyone known to them; (c) besetting or watching the dwelling-house, or place where their intimate partner, or anyone known to them, resides, works, carries on business or happens to be; or (d) engaging in threatening conduct directed at their intimate partner or any member of their intimate partner’s family. Punishment (2) Every person who contravenes subsection (1) is guilty of (a) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years; or (b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.

Uttering threats — intimate partner

3The Act is amended by adding the following after section 264.1: 264.2 (1) Everyone commits an offence who, in any manner, knowingly utters, conveys to their intimate partner or causes them to receive a threat (a) to cause death or bodily harm to any person; (b) to burn, destroy or damage real or personal property; or (c) to kill, poison or injure an animal or bird that is the property of any person. Punishment (2) Everyone who commits an offence under paragraph (1)(a) is guilty of (a) an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years; or (b) an offence punishable on summary conviction. Idem (3) Everyone who commits an offence under paragraph (1)(b) or (c) is guilty of (a) an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding four years; or (b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.

Assaulting an intimate partner

4The Act is amended by adding the following after section 266: 266.1 Everyone who commits an assault against their intimate partner is guilty of (a) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years; or (b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.

Assaulting intimate partner with weapon or causing bodily harm

5The Act is amended by adding the following after section 267: 267.1 (1) Everyone commits an offence who, in committing an assault against their intimate partner, (a) carries, uses or threatens to use a weapon or an imitation of one; (b) causes bodily harm to the complainant; or (c) chokes, suffocates or strangles the complainant. Punishment (2) Everyone who commits an offence under subsection (1) is guilty of (a) an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than 12 years; or (b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.

Aggravated assault of intimate partner

6The Act is amended by adding the following after section 268: 268.1 (1) Everyone commits an aggravated assault against their intimate partner who wounds, maims, disfigures or endangers the life of their intimate partner. Punishment (2) Everyone who commits an aggravated assault against their intimate partner is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 14 years.

Further detention

7(1) The portion of subsection 490(2) of the Act before paragraph (a) is replaced by the following: (2) Nothing shall be detained under the authority of paragraph (1)(b) for a period of more than one year after the day of the seizure, or any longer period that ends when an application made under paragraph (a) is decided, unless (2) The portion of subsection 490(3) of the Act before paragraph (a) is replaced by the following: Idem (3) More than one order for further detention may be made under paragraph (2)(a) but the cumulative period of detention shall not exceed two years after the day of the seizure, or any longer period that ends when an application made under paragraph (a) is decided, unless (3) Paragraph 490(3)(a) of the Act is replaced by the following: (a) a judge of a superior court of criminal jurisdiction or a judge as defined in section 552, on the making of a summary application to him after three clear days notice thereof to the person from whom the thing detained was seized, is satisfied that the further detention of the thing seized is warranted for a specified period and subject to such other conditions as the judge considers just, and the judge so orders; or (4) Section 490 of the Act is amended by adding the following after subsection (3.1): Notice — right to challenge detention (3.2) Within 30 days after the day of the seizure, the prosecutor or the peace officer or other person having custody of the thing seized shall give notice, in the form prescribed by regulation, to the lawful owner or person who is lawfully entitled to possession of the thing seized of their right to challenge the detention of the thing seized. No notice (3.3) A justice, a judge of a superior court of criminal jurisdiction or a judge as defined in section 552 may proceed ex parte and hold a hearing in camera to determine an application for an order made under subsection (2) or (3) in the absence of the person from whom the thing detained was seized if the justice or judge is of the opinion that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the conduct of an investigation of the offence to which the thing seized relates would be jeopardized if the person were notified of the seizure.

No release from custody — intimate partner offences

8The Act is amended by adding the following after section 499: 499.1 (1) Despite sections 498 and 499, a peace officer shall not release a person who has been arrested for an intimate partner offence if the person (a) was convicted of an intimate partner offence in the five years preceding the day on which the arrest was made; or (b) was, immediately before the arrest, at large on a release order in respect of an intimate partner offence. Definition of intimate partner offence (2) In this section, intimate partner offence means an offence under any of sections 264 to 268 if the victim is an intimate partner of the accused.

Risk assessment

9The Act is amended by adding the following after section 523: 523.01 (1) A court having jurisdiction over an accused in respect of an offence in the commission of which violence was allegedly used, threatened or attempted against their intimate partner may order that the accused be detained in custody for seven days to undergo a risk-of-reoffending assessment, if it has reasonable grounds to believe that such evidence is necessary to determine whether to make an order under subsection 523(2) in order to protect the intimate partner. When court may order assessment (2) The court may make a risk-of-reoffending assessment order at any stage of proceedings against the accused of its own motion, on application of the prosecutor or on application of the accused’s intimate partner. When assessment completed (3) An accused in respect of whom a risk-of-reoffending assessment order is made shall appear before the court that made the order as soon as practicable after the assessment is completed.

Official record· parl.ca
Official drafter summary (parl.ca)

This enactment amends the Criminal Code in order to: (a) create a new specific offence of murder in the first degree if the murder is committed against an intimate partner in the context of a pattern of coercive or controlling conduct; (b) provide that, if an offender commits manslaughter against their intimate partner while engaging in, or after having engaged in, a pattern of coercive or controlling conduct, the court must consider whether to impose a sentence of imprisonment for life on the offender and, if that sentence is imposed, an adult offender is ineligible for parole for 10 to 25 years; (c) create new offences in respect of included offences in which violence is used, threatened or attempted against an intimate partner; and (d) increase the detention period of things seized under section 490 of the Act from three months to 180 days. Available on the House of Commons website at the following address: www.ourcommons.ca 1st Session, 45th Parliament, 3 - 4 Charles III, 2025 - 2026 HOUSE OF COMMONS OF CANADA BILL C-225 An Act to amend the Criminal Code His Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate and House of Commons of Canada, enacts as follows: R.‍S.‍, c. C-46 Criminal Code 1 Section 231 of the Criminal Code is amended by adding the following after subsection ( 3 ): Murder of intimate partner ( 3.‍1 ) Irrespective of whether a murder is planned and deliberate on the part of any person, murder is first degree murder when the victim is that person’s intimate partner and the death is caused by that person while engaging in, or after having engaged in, a pattern of coercive or controlling conduct with intent to cause the victim to believe that the victim’s physical or psychological safety is threatened. 1.‍1 Section 236 of the Act is renumbered as subsection 236 ( 1 ) and is amended by adding the following: Manslaughter of intimate partner ( 2 ) The court that imposes a sentence for manslaughter shall consider imposing a sentence of imprisonment for life if the person committed the manslaughter against their intimate partner while engaging in, or after having engaged in, a pattern of coercive or controlling conduct with intent to cause their intimate partner to believe that their physical or psychological safety is threatened. 2 The Act is amended by adding the following after section 263 : Violence against intimate partner 263.‍1 ( 1 ) Everyone who commits an offence — referred to in this section as the “included offence” — in which violence is used, threatened or attempted against their intimate partner is (a) guilty of an indictable offence and liable to the punishment provided for in subsection ( 3 ); or (b) guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction. Limitation ( 2 ) No proceedings under subsection ( 1 ) shall be (a) commenced by way of indictment if the included offence may be prosecuted only by way of summary conviction proceedings; or (b) commenced by way of summary conviction proceedings if the included offence may be prosecuted only by way of indictment. Punishment ( 3 ) Everyone who is found guilty of an indictable offence under subsection ( 1 ) is liable to a term of imprisonment of not more than (a) five years, if the maximum term of imprisonment for the included offence is two years or more but less than five years; (b) 10 years, if the maximum term of imprisonment for the included offence is five years or more but less than 10 years; (c) 14 years, if the maximum term of imprisonment for the included offence is 10 years or more but less than 14 years; or (d) life, if the maximum term of imprisonment for the included offence is 14 years or more and up to imprisonment for life. Applicable provisions ( 4 ) Subject to paragraphs ( 1 )‍(a) and (b) and subsections ( 2 ) and ( 3 ), any provision of this Act or any other Act of Parliament — including one in respect of procedure, orders or consequences — that would have been applicable in relation to the included offence applies in relation to an offence under subsection ( 1 ). 3 The portion of subsection 490 ( 2 ) of the Act before paragraph (a) is replaced by the following: Further detention ( 2 ) Nothing shall be detained under the authority of paragraph ( 1 )‍(b) for a period of more than 180 days after the day of the seizure, or any longer period that ends when an application made under paragraph (a) is decided, unless 4 Paragraph 515 ( 6 )‍(b.‍ 1 ) of the Act is replaced by the following: (b.‍ 1 ) with an offence in the commission of which violence was allegedly used, threatened or attempted against their intimate partner, and the accused (i) has been previously convicted or discharged under section 730 of an offence in the commission of which violence was used, threatened or attempted against any intimate partner of the accused, or (ii) was, at the time the offence is alleged to have been committed, subject to a recognizance entered into under section 810, 810.‍02, 810.‍03, 810.‍1 or 810.‍2, in the case where the...

AI-assisted analysis
What MPs debatedCONSENSUS19 speeches · 11 MPs · 15,002 words
Points of contention
  • The effectiveness of harsher penalties for deterrence
  • Adequacy of existing support systems for victims
  • The balance of victims' rights in legislation
  • Concerns over redundancy of laws on domestic violence

All parties are broadly aligned in supporting the bill, though with some critical nuances raised.

Where MPs stood11 MPs · grouped by party · ranked by speaking volume
AI-assisted analysis
CPC6 spoke · 6 support · 0 oppose
Frank Caputo
Frank CaputoSUPPORTS7 speeches · 3,066 words
Argued that the bill is a necessary step to address intimate partner violence, emphasizing its importance in the law.This bill is for them.
TJ
Tamara JansenSUPPORTS1 speech · 1,702 words
Argued for the need to treat intimate partner violence differently in law to protect vulnerable women.When we fail to make that distinction, we fail to recognize the very real and documented risk that comes with intimate partner violence.
Connie Cody
Connie CodySUPPORTS1 speech · 1,591 words
Argued that Bill C-225 addresses the gap in how intimate partner violence is treated in law.Bill C-225 is about closing that gap. It is about making sure that when violence happens with an intimate relationship, the law responds with the seriousness it deserves.
Tamara Kronis
Tamara KronisSUPPORTS1 speech · 1,423 words
Argued that intimate partner violence is a pervasive issue requiring urgent action.Bill C-225 is not symbolic. It is a response to a growing and serious problem.
Shelby Kramp-Neuman
Shelby Kramp-NeumanSUPPORTS1 speech · 1,134 words
Argued that Bill C-225 addresses a critical issue of intimate partner violence that often goes unrecognized in society.Bill C-225 represents an opportunity to close the gaps, to recognize the seriousness of intimate partner violence and to prevent other families from experiencing this unimaginable loss.
Marc Dalton
Marc DaltonSUPPORTS1 speech · 82 words
Argued for strengthening protections for victims of crime.I just wonder if the member could tell us how we as legislators can justify not strengthening protections for victims through measures like Bailey's law...
LPC3 spoke · 3 support · 0 oppose
Legislative stages
  1. First reading (House of Commons)
    Sep 18, 2025
  2. Second reading (House of Commons)
    Dec 3, 2025
  3. Third reading (House of Commons)
    Apr 27, 2026
  4. First reading (Senate)
    Apr 28, 2026
  5. Second reading (Senate)
    Jun 9, 2026
  6. Third reading (Senate)
    Jun 16, 2026
  7. Royal Assent
    Jun 17, 2026