← Your dashboard·HoC · 45-1active
Official record· LEGISinfoHouse of Commons · Bill C-236

C-236 · Addressing the Continuing Victimization of Homicide Victims' Families Act

An Act to amend the Criminal Code, the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and the Prisons and Reformatories Act

Introduced Sep 22, 2025·Sponsor: Dane LloydCPCMEDIUM
AI-assisted analysis
At a glance
  • Adds refusal to disclose the location of bodies as a factor in sentencing and parole decisions.
  • Mandates courts to consider this refusal as an aggravating circumstance for serious offenses.
  • Aims to reduce victimization of families whose loved ones' remains are not found.
Convicted offendersFamilies of homicide victimsJudicial system
AI-assisted analysis
What's actually in this bill
Full billAggravating circumstances for homicide cases
What it does

This bill adds new rules regarding sentencing and parole for offenders who have information about the location of homicide victims' bodies but refuse to share it. It allows courts to consider such refusals as aggravating factors during sentencing and grants parole boards the power to deny parole based on such refusals.

Why it matters

This legislation aims to support the families of homicide victims by reinforcing accountability for offenders and ensuring that the dignity of the deceased is respected. It addresses a critical emotional and legal issue for families seeking closure.

The problem it addresses

The bill addresses the lack of penalties for offenders who withhold information about homicide victims' remains, which can prolong suffering for families.

Who benefits

Victims' families benefit by potentially seeing stronger sentences and less likelihood of early parole for those who refuse to disclose vital information.

The tradeoff

The tradeoff involves increased penalties and a more severe parole process for offenders, which may raise concerns about the effects on their rights to a fair punishment and rehabilitation opportunities.

homicide victims' familiesoffenders convicted of homicideparole boardscourtslaw enforcement authorities
Read the actual text (8)
Short title

1This Act may be cited as the Addressing the Continuing Victimization of Homicide Victims’ Families Act .

Aggravating circumstance — body or remains

2The Criminal Code is amended by adding the following after section 718.04: 718.05 (1) When a court imposes a sentence for an offence in relation to the death of a person, if it is satisfied that the offender has information respecting the location of the body or remains of the person but refuses to provide persons in authority with that information, the court shall, in order to denounce and deter such behaviour, consider the refusal as an aggravating circumstance. Reasons (2) If the court is satisfied of the existence of the aggravating circumstance referred to in subsection (1) but decides not to give effect to it for sentencing purposes, the court shall give reasons for its decision.

Power of court to delay parole

3Section 743.6 of the Act is amended by adding the following after subsection (1.2): (1.3) Despite section 120 of the Corrections and Conditional Release Act , if an offender receives a sentence of imprisonment of two years or more, including a sentence of imprisonment for life, on conviction for an offence in relation to the death of a person and the court is satisfied that the offender has information respecting the location of the body or remains of the person but refuses to provide it to persons in authority, the court shall order that the portion of the sentence that must be served before the offender may be released on full parole is one half of the sentence or ten years, whichever is less, unless the court is satisfied, having regard to the circumstances of the commission of the offence and the character and circumstances of the offender, that the expression of society’s denunciation of the offence and the objectives of specific and general deterrence would be adequately served by a period of parole ineligibility determined in accordance with the Corrections and Conditional Release Act . Revocation of parole order (1.4) The court shall revoke the order made under subsection (1.3) if it is satisfied that the circumstances for which it was made have ceased to exist.

4Paragraph 4(a) of the Corrections and Conditional Release Act is replaced by the following: (a) the sentence is carried out having regard to all relevant available information, including the stated reasons and recommendations of the sentencing judge, the nature and gravity of the offence, the degree of responsibility of the offender, information from the trial or sentencing process, any order made under subsection 743.6(1.3) of the Criminal Code , the release pol­icies of and comments from the Parole Board of Canada and information obtained from victims, offenders and other components of the criminal justice system;

5Paragraph 101(a) of the Act is replaced by the following: (a) parole boards take into consideration all relevant available information, including the stated reasons and recommendations of the sentencing judge, the nature and gravity of the offence, the degree of respon­sibility of the offender, information from the trial or sentencing process, any order made under subsection 743.6(1.3) of the Criminal Code , and information obtained from victims, offenders and other components of the criminal justice system, including assessments provided by correctional authorities;

Refusing to grant parole

6Section 102 of the Act is renumbered as subsection 102(1) and is amended by adding the following: (2) The Board or a provincial parole board may refuse to grant parole to an offender who has been sentenced for an offence in relation to the death of a person if it is satisfied that the offender has information respecting the location of the body or remains of the person but refuses to provide it to persons in authority.

Refusal to authorize

7Section 116 of the Act is amended by adding the following after subsection (1): (1.1) The Board may refuse to authorize the unescorted temporary absence of an offender who has been sentenced for an offence in relation to the death of a person if it is satisfied that the offender has information respecting the location of the body or remains of the person but refuses to provide it to persons in authority.

Eligibility — consideration

8Section 7.3 of the Prisons and Reformatories Act is amended by adding the following after subsection (2): (3) The designated authority may refuse to authorize the temporary absence of a prisoner who has been sentenced for an offence in relation to the death of a person if it is satisfied that the prisoner has information respecting the location of the body or remains of the person but refuses to provide it to persons in authority.

Official record· parl.ca
Official drafter summary (parl.ca)

This enactment amends the Criminal Code to add as an aggravating factor for sentencing purposes and as a reason to delay parole the fact that a person who is convicted of certain offences refuses to provide persons in authority with information respecting the location of bodies or remains. It also amends the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and the Prisons and Reformatories Act to add that fact as a consideration in the making of certain decisions under those Acts. Available on the House of Commons website at the following address: www.ourcommons.ca 1st Session, 45th Parliament, 3 - 4 Charles III, 2025 HOUSE OF COMMONS OF CANADA BILL C-236 An Act to amend the Criminal Code, the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and the Prisons and Reformatories Act Preamble Whereas surviving family members of persons who die as a result of a crime are avoidably further victimized when the bodies or remains of their loved ones are not found; Whereas the refusal of offenders to provide persons in authority with information respecting the location of bodies or remains is the primary reason author­ities are unable to locate those bodies or remains and results in the aggravated and continuing victimization of family members; Whereas the aggravated and continuing victimization of family members caused by offenders who refuse to provide persons in authority with information respecting the location of bodies or remains is a problem in Canada; Whereas, in the case of an offender who refuses to provide persons in authority with information respecting the location of bodies or remains, creating negative consequences in relation to sentencing and the manner in which the sentence is carried out could address the problem by deterring such behaviour; Whereas the existence of such negative consequences would be consistent with the sentencing principles of denunciation and deterrence; And whereas Parliament is of the opinion that this approach achieves the desired public interest object­ive while being consistent with the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ; Now, therefore, His Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate and House of Commons of Canada, enacts as follows: Short Title Short title 1 This Act may be cited as the Addressing the Continuing Victimization of Homicide Victims’ Families Act . R.‍S.‍, c. C-46 Criminal Code 2 The Criminal Code is amended by adding the following after section 718.‍04 : Aggravating circumstance — body or remains Start of inserted block 718.‍05 ( 1 ) When a court imposes a sentence for an offence in relation to the death of a person, if it is satisfied that the offender has information respecting the location of the body or remains of the person but refuses to provide persons in authority with that information, the court shall, in order to denounce and deter such behaviour, consider the refusal as an aggravating circumstance. End of inserted block Reasons Start of inserted block ( 2 ) If the court is satisfied of the existence of the aggravating circumstance referred to in subsection ( 1 ) but decides not to give effect to it for sentencing purposes, the court shall give reasons for its decision. End of inserted block 3 Section 743.‍6 of the Act is amended by adding the following after subsection ( 1.‍2 ): Power of court to delay parole Start of inserted block ( 1.‍3 ) Despite section 120 of the Corrections and Conditional Release Act , if an offender receives a sentence of imprisonment of two years or more, including a sentence of imprisonment for life, on conviction for an offence in relation to the death of a person and the court is satisfied that the offender has information respecting the location of the body or remains of the person but refuses to provide it to persons in authority, the court shall order that the portion of the sentence that must be served before the offender may be released on full parole is one half of the sentence or ten years, whichever is less, unless the court is satisfied, having regard to the circumstances of the commission of the offence and the character and circumstances of the offender, that the expression of society’s denunciation of the offence and the objectives of specific and general deterrence would be adequately served by a period of parole ineligibility determined in accordance with the Corrections and Conditional Release Act . End of inserted block Revocation of parole order Start of inserted block ( 1.‍4 ) The court shall revoke the order made under subsection ( 1.‍3 ) if it is satisfied that the circumstances for which it was made have ceased to exist. End of inserted block 1992, c. 20 Corrections and Conditional Release Act 4 Paragraph 4 (a) of the Corrections and Conditional Release Act is replaced by the following: (a) the sentence is carried out having regard to all relevant available information, including the stated reasons and recommendations of the sentencing judge, the nature and gravity of the offence, the degree of...

AI-assisted analysis
What MPs debatedCONTESTED22 speeches · 13 MPs · 15,642 words
Points of contention
  • Whether judges currently consider non-disclosure of remains in sentencing
  • The potential impact on parole ineligibility periods
  • Concerns about the bill being unnecessary and duplicative of existing laws
  • Debate on whether the bill enhances or complicates public safety outcomes

The bill saw strong support from Conservatives, with mixed opinions from Liberals and Bloc, indicating some party alignment.

Where MPs stood12 MPs · grouped by party · ranked by speaking volume
AI-assisted analysis
CPC7 spoke · 7 support · 0 oppose
Dane Lloyd
Dane LloydSUPPORTS8 speeches · 4,611 words
Argued that withholding information about victims' remains is an ongoing crime against families and should have legal consequences.It is a crime that currently has no consequences. The idea that a killer could be released on parole while they continue to refuse to provide this information is abhorrent to Canadians.
Michelle Rempel Garner
Michelle Rempel GarnerSUPPORTS1 speech · 1,385 words
Argued that the bill will provide justice for victims by ensuring that the refusal to disclose the location of remains is considered an aggravating factor in sentencing.I am proud to say that I will be supporting this bill, and I know that many others will be as well.
Billy Morin
Billy MorinSUPPORTS1 speech · 1,343 words
Argued that Bill C-236 would provide meaningful actions towards justice and closure for families of murdered and missing indigenous women and girls.Bill C-236 recognizes that reality. Limiting unnecessary parole hearings and strengthening denial provisions would reduce the emotional toll placed on families.
Michael Cooper
Michael CooperSUPPORTS1 speech · 1,144 words
Argued that McCann's law addresses the injustice faced by the victims' families by denying parole to murderers who conceal the remains of their victims.McCann's law stands for one simple underlying principle: no body, no parole.
Larry Brock
Larry BrockSUPPORTS1 speech · 1,061 words
Argued that Bill C-236 addresses a fundamental injustice faced by victims' families.Justice is not only about what happens in a courtroom. It is about whether families are able to move forward with dignity, with answers, and most importantly, with the truth.
Todd Doherty
Todd DohertySUPPORTS1 speech · 164 words
Applauded the bill for addressing issues related to high-profile criminal cases.I applaud our hon. colleague for the bill, and I would like to offer one more chance for him to talk about the victims' families, because that is really whom we are here for today.
Jeff Kibble
Jeff KibbleSUPPORTS1 speech · 99 words
Acknowledged the hard work and dedication of colleagues in supporting victims and their families.I ask that all members support the bill, which would make lives better for families like the McCanns and for all Canadians.
LPC3 spoke · 1 support · 1 oppose
Legislative stages
  1. First reading (House of Commons)
    Sep 22, 2025
  2. Second reading (House of Commons)
    Mar 26, 2026