← Your dashboard·HoC · 45-1active
Official record· LEGISinfoHouse of Commons · Bill C-259

C-259 · Fair Representation Act

An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code (fair representation)

Introduced Jan 27, 2026·Sponsor: Heather McPhersonNDPMEDIUM
AI-assisted analysis
At a glance
  • Amends the Canada Labour Code to define employer influence over trade unions.
  • Revokes certification of trade unions found to be dominated by employers.
  • Imposes penalties on employers who improperly influence trade unions.
  • Allows employees to challenge trade union certifications if domination is suspected.
Employees in certified bargaining unitsTrade unionsEmployers
AI-assisted analysis
What's actually in this bill
Full billRegulations on trade union influence
What it does

This bill strengthens rules against employer influence over trade unions and allows employees to challenge a union's certification if they believe it is dominated by an employer. It imposes penalties for violations of these regulations.

Why it matters

This legislation aims to protect workers' rights and ensure that trade unions represent the interests of employees rather than employers. It is important for maintaining fair labor practices in Canada.

The problem it addresses

The bill addresses the potential for employers to interfere with trade unions, which can undermine collective bargaining and workers' rights.

Who benefits

Employees benefit from stronger protections against employer influence in trade unions, which can lead to more equitable negotiations with employers.

The tradeoff

Employers may face increased scrutiny and penalties for their influence over unions, potentially restricting their relationship with these organizations, which could lead to operational challenges for business owners.

employeesemployerstrade unionsLabour Board
Read the actual text (11)
Short title

1This Act may be cited as the Fair Representation Act .

Where certification prohibited

2Subsection 25(1) of the Canada Labour Code is replaced by the following: 25 (1) Notwithstanding anything in this Part, the Board shall not certify a trade union as the bargaining agent for any unit comprised of employees of the employer and any collective agreement between the trade union and the employer that applies to any such employees shall be deemed not to be a collective agreement for the purposes of this Part if the Board is satisfied that the trade union is dominated or influenced by an employer or a person acting on behalf of an employer, within the meaning of subsection 94(1.1) .

3Section 28 of the Act is amended by striking out “and” at the end of paragraph (b), by adding “and” at the end of paragraph (c) and by adding the following after paragraph (c): (d) is satisfied, as of the date of the filing of the application or of any other date that the Board considers appropriate, that the trade union is not dominated or influenced by an employer or a person acting on behalf of an employer, within the meaning of subsection 94(1.1), and is governed by members who are elected by employees in the unit that the trade union proposes to represent as bargaining agent.

Application where employer domination or influence

4The Act is amended by adding the following after section 40: 40.1 (1) If a trade union has been certified as the bargaining agent for a bargaining unit, any group of employees who claim that the trade union is dominated or influenced by an employer or a person acting on behalf of an employer, within the meaning of subsection 94(1.1), may, at any time, apply to the Board for an order revoking the certification of that trade union. Inquiry (2) The Board may, on its own initiative, hold an inquiry to determine if the trade union is dominated or influenced by an employer or a person acting on behalf of an employer, but it must do so if at least 25% of the employees in a bargaining unit represented by the trade union make a written application under subsection (1). No application during strike or lockout (3) Except with the consent of the Board, an application under subsection (1) must not be made in respect of a bargaining agent for employees in a bargaining unit during a strike or lockout that is not prohibited by this Part and that involves those employees. Revocation of certification (4) If, after the Board’s inquiry, the Board is satisfied that the trade union is dominated or influenced by an employer or a person acting on behalf of an employer, the Board shall, by order, revoke the certification of the trade union as the bargaining agent for the bargaining unit.

Application for revocation of certification of a council of trade unions

5Subsection 41(1) of the Act is replaced by the following: 41 (1) If a council of trade unions has been certified as the bargaining agent for a bargaining unit, in addition to any circumstances in which an application for revocation of the certification of the council of trade unions may be made under section 38 or subsection 40(1) or 40.1(1) , any employee in the bargaining unit, the employer of the employees in the bargaining unit or a trade union that forms part of the council of trade unions may apply to the Board for revocation of the certification on the ground that the council of trade unions no longer meets the requirements for certification of a council of trade unions.

Effect of revocation or declaration

6The portion of section 42 of the Act before paragraph (a) is replaced by the following: 42 If the Board makes an order under section 39, subsection 40(2) or 40.1(4) or section 41 revoking the certification of a trade union or council of trade unions, or declaring that a trade union is not entitled to represent the employees in a bargaining unit,

Prohibition on employer domination or influence

7Subsection 94(1) of the Act is replaced by the following: 94 (1) No employer or person acting on behalf of an employer shall dominate or influence a trade union . Domination or influence (1.1) An employer or a person acting on behalf of an employer dominates or influences a trade union if they, directly or indirectly, (a) participate in or interfere with the formation or administration of a trade union or the representation of employees by a trade union; or (b) contribute financial or other support to a trade union.

Prohibition against domination or influence

8The Act is amended by adding the following after section 100: 100.01 Every employer who contravenes subsection 94(1) is guilty of an offence and liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding $100,000.

Administrative monetary penalties

9The portion of subsection 111.01(1) of the Act before paragraph (b) is replaced by the following: 111.01 (1) The Governor in Council may make regulations establishing an administrative monetary penalties scheme for the purpose of promoting compliance with subsections 94( 1 ), (4) and (6), including regulations (a) designating as a violation the contravention of subsection 94( 1 ), (4) or (6);

Review and report

10The Minister of Labour must, within five years after the day on which this section comes into force, undertake a review of the provisions enacted by this Act and their operation and cause a report on the review to be tabled before each House of Parliament on any of the first 15 days on which that House is sitting after the report is completed.

30 days after royal assent

11This Act comes into force 30 days after the day on which it receives royal assent.

Official record· parl.ca
Official drafter summary (parl.ca)

This enactment amends the Canada Labour Code to clarify what constitutes dominating or influencing a trade union by an employer, or a person acting on behalf of an employer, and to provide that any trade union that is so dominated or influenced will lose its certification. It also provides penalties to be imposed on employers who dominate or influence trade unions. Available on the House of Commons website at the following address: www.ourcommons.ca 1st Session, 45th Parliament, 3 - 4 Charles III, 2025 - 2026 HOUSE OF COMMONS OF CANADA BILL C-259 An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code (fair representation) Preamble Whereas collective bargaining is a cornerstone of fair labour relations in Canada; Whereas workers have the right to freely choose representatives that act independently of their employer; Whereas employer domination and influence over trade unions undermine that right, suppress wages, and erode trust in the collective bargaining process; And whereas Parliament recognizes the need to ensure that every certified bargaining agent in Canada is independent, democratic and accountable to its members; Now, therefore, His Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate and House of Commons of Canada, enacts as follows: Short Title Short title 1 This Act may be cited as the Fair Representation Act . R.‍S.‍, c. L-2 Canada Labour Code 2 Subsection 25 ( 1 ) of the Canada Labour Code is replaced by the following: Where certification prohibited 25 ( 1 ) Notwithstanding anything in this Part, the Board shall not certify a trade union as the bargaining agent for any unit comprised of employees of the employer and any collective agreement between the trade union and the employer that applies to any such employees shall be deemed not to be a collective agreement for the purposes of this Part Insertion start if Insertion end the Board is satisfied that the trade union is dominated or influenced by an employer Insertion start or a person acting on behalf of an employer, within the meaning of subsection 94 ( 1.‍1 ) Insertion end . 3 Section 28 of the Act is amended by striking out “and” at the end of paragraph (b), by adding “and” at the end of paragraph (c) and by adding the following after paragraph (c): Start of inserted block (d) is satisfied, as of the date of the filing of the application or of any other date that the Board considers appropriate, that the trade union is not dominated or influenced by an employer or a person acting on behalf of an employer, within the meaning of subsection 94 ( 1.‍1 ), and is governed by members who are elected by employees in the unit that the trade union proposes to represent as bargaining agent. End of inserted block 4 The Act is amended by adding the following after section 40 : Application where employer domination or influence Start of inserted block 40.‍1 ( 1 ) If a trade union has been certified as the bargaining agent for a bargaining unit, any group of employees who claim that the trade union is dominated or influenced by an employer or a person acting on behalf of an employer, within the meaning of subsection 94 ( 1.‍1 ), may, at any time, apply to the Board for an order revoking the certification of that trade union. End of inserted block Inquiry Start of inserted block ( 2 ) The Board may, on its own initiative, hold an inquiry to determine if the trade union is dominated or influenced by an employer or a person acting on behalf of an employer, but it must do so if at least 25 % of the employees in a bargaining unit represented by the trade union make a written application under subsection ( 1 ). End of inserted block No application during strike or lockout Start of inserted block ( 3 ) Except with the consent of the Board, an application under subsection ( 1 ) must not be made in respect of a bargaining agent for employees in a bargaining unit during a strike or lockout that is not prohibited by this Part and that involves those employees. End of inserted block Revocation of certification Start of inserted block ( 4 ) If, after the Board’s inquiry, the Board is satisfied that the trade union is dominated or influenced by an employer or a person acting on behalf of an employer, the Board shall, by order, revoke the certification of the trade union as the bargaining agent for the bargaining unit. End of inserted block 5 Subsection 41 ( 1 ) of the Act is replaced by the following: Application for revocation of certification of a council of trade unions 41 ( 1 ) Insertion start If Insertion end a council of trade unions has been certified as the bargaining agent for a bargaining unit, in addition to any circumstances in which an application for revocation of the certification of the council of trade unions may be made Insertion start under Insertion end section 38 or subsection 40 ( 1 ) Insertion start or 40.‍1 ( 1 ) Insertion end , any employee in the bargaining unit, the employer of the employees in the bargaining unit or a trade union that forms part of...

AI-assisted analysis
What MPs debatedCONTESTED234 speeches · 26 MPs · 60,994 words
Points of contention
  • Disagreement on the necessity of increasing MPs from 308 to 338
  • Debate over how to ensure fair representation for Quebec
  • Differing viewpoints on the impact of the bill on smaller provinces
  • NDP's lack of a clear number for proposed seats

The Conservatives and NDP broadly aligned in increasing the number of MPs, while the Liberals push for maintaining the current size with fairer distribution.

Where MPs stood25 MPs · grouped by party · ranked by speaking volume
AI-assisted analysis
CPC10 spoke · 7 support · 2 oppose
Scott Reid
Scott ReidSUPPORTS16 speeches · 8,512 words
Argued for Bill C-259 as a necessary step towards fair representation by population for Canadians.We want to have a House of Commons that represents as much as is practically, legally and constitutionally possible the principle of representation by population.
Michael Chong
Michael ChongSUPPORTS21 speeches · 6,669 words
Argued that the bill upholds the principle of representation by population while protecting slower-growing regions and ensuring Quebec's representation.The fundamental makeup of this House is that it be representative of the population… that this chamber needs to reflect the makeup of Canada today and it currently does not.
TU
Tim UppalSUPPORTS44 speeches · 4,791 words
Argued that the bill addresses the under-representation of fast-growing provinces like Alberta, B.C., and Ontario.It is time to vote on one of the bills, the bill that is presented here. We have a bill that is fair for all provinces.
Kyle Seeback
Kyle SeebackSUPPORTS12 speeches · 4,256 words
Argued that Bill C-259 provides fair representation for all Canadians, particularly those in rapidly growing provinces like Ontario, British Columbia, and Alberta.This bill is a fair and reasonable fix to voter under-representation in Canada.
Chris Warkentin
Chris WarkentinSUPPORTS10 speeches · 3,294 words
Argued that the bill addresses fair representation for all Canadians in the House of Commons.Albertans are passionate about equality and representation. They want to see—
Blake Richards
Blake RichardsSUPPORTS4 speeches · 2,060 words
Argued that the current representation formula unfairly penalizes fast-growing provinces like Alberta.A Canadian living in Alberta has as much to say about the future direction that he or she wants his or her country to take as a Canadian living in P.E.I., or any other province, and should have an equal say in our Parliament.
Mark Strahl
Mark StrahlSUPPORTS3 speeches · 373 words
Argued that British Columbia is under-represented in the House of Commons.When I was on the campaign trail the people of British Columbia were concerned about the fact that we are under-represented in this chamber.
James Bezan
James BezanOPPOSES1 speech · 158 words
Criticized the idea of reducing electoral representation in Manitoba.I would suggest that if he were serious about reducing the number of seats in Manitoba, and he wants to go home and sell it, I would suggest that probably we could get rid of Winnipeg North.
Pierre Poilievre
Pierre PoilievreOPPOSES1 speech · 106 words
Criticized the NDP's claim that the bill is short on seats for Ontario compared to previous legislation.In fact, that is the result of census data that has now come in and been applied in the same fair fashion as we had foreseen all along.
Costas Menegakis
Costas MenegakisNEUTRAL1 speech · 83 words
Introduced the topic by highlighting the diversity and size of the hon. member's riding.Could the hon. member elaborate on the importance of this legislation, specifically in his community, as it relates to new immigrants, new people who move into the riding?
Independent6 spoke · 2 support · 4 oppose
SD
Stéphane DionOPPOSES47 speeches · 12,139 words
Criticized the Conservative plan for increasing the number of MPs by 10% while slashing public services.Canadians do not want more MPs; they do not want more politicians. They really do not need them, especially in these tough times when the Conservative government is asking people to tighten their belts.
JP
Joe PrestonSUPPORTS13 speeches · 5,186 words
Argued that the bill ensures fair representation by population in Canada.This legislation that has been brought forward by the minister [...] would not only positively help my province and that member's province of Ontario, but it would also help Alberta, B.C. and all of Canada to get back to the reputation that our founding fathers brought forward, which is representation by population.
Alexandre Boulerice
Alexandre BoulericeOPPOSES5 speeches · 2,041 words
Criticized the Conservative government's approach to the bill as a sign of contempt for democracy and limiting parliamentary debate.It is vital, imperative and fundamental that we respect the rule of one person, one vote, but it is not the only rule.
GC
Guy CaronSUPPORTS5 speeches · 1,909 words
Argued for the principle that Quebec should have 24.35% of the seats to ensure fair representation.The NDP is proposing a principle that would result in Quebec having 24.35% of the seats.
JF
Jean-François FortinOPPOSES3 speeches · 276 words
Argued that the bill changes the political weight of provinces, particularly adversely affecting Quebec.When a bill is drafted that changes the political weight of representatives from each province, it is important to consider that reality.
Brad Butt
Brad ButtOPPOSES1 speech · 197 words
Argued against the Liberal proposal, stating it reduces democratic representation.Who will the losers be under the Liberal plan?
LPC4 spoke · 1 support · 2 oppose
Legislative stages
  1. First reading (House of Commons)
    Jan 27, 2026