← Your dashboard·HoC · 45-1passed
Official record· LEGISinfoHouse of Commons · Bill C-4

C-4 · Making Life More Affordable for Canadians Act

An Act respecting certain affordability measures for Canadians and another measure

Introduced Jun 5, 2025·Sponsor: François-Philippe ChampagneLPCMEDIUM
AI-assisted analysis
At a glance
  • Reduces the personal income tax rate for the lowest bracket to 14.5% in 2025 and 14% in 2026.
  • Introduces a temporary GST rebate for first-time home buyers to help with housing affordability.
  • Repeals certain greenhouse gas pricing regulations.
  • Changes regulations to better protect personal information of political party members.
Low income earnersFirst-time home buyersPolitical parties
AI-assisted analysis
What's actually in this bill
Why this bill matters

This bill introduces financial measures intended to make life more affordable for Canadians through tax changes and housing rebates, while also significantly altering environmental regulation and data protections for political activities. The broad implications affect various aspects of economic stability, sustainability, and democratic integrity.

The tradeoff

The bill balances immediate financial relief for low-income taxpayers and first-time home buyers against the potential long-term economic and environmental repercussions of reduced climate regulations and weakened data protections for voters.

GRAB-BAGTITLE: MISLEADINGA grab-bag bill: 5 parts across 4 different areas of law.
Why the title misleads

The title does not mention the repeal of greenhouse gas pricing regulations, the personal information protections for political parties, or the specific financial mechanisms introduced, which are crucial to understanding the bill's full implications.

What it actually covers
income tax reductionGST housing rebaterepeal of greenhouse gas pricing regulationspersonal information protection for political parties
PART 1Reduction in personal income tax rates
What it does

This part of the bill amends the Income Tax Act to lower the income tax rate for the lowest tax bracket to 14.5% in 2025 and to 14% starting in 2026. The amended rates affect individuals based on their taxable income.

Why it matters

This change could provide financial relief to low-income individuals by reducing their tax burden, potentially increasing disposable income. It matters because tax rates impact take-home pay and economic well-being for lower-income Canadians.

The problem it addresses

The bill seeks to address the high tax burden on individuals in the lowest income bracket.

Who benefits

Low-income earners will benefit from reduced tax rates, resulting in lower tax payments.

The tradeoff

The reduced tax revenue may impact government funding for public services that many depend on, potentially affecting the broader community.

low-income earnerstaxpayersgovernment agenciespublic service recipients

Amends: Income Tax Act

Read the actual text (1)
Rates for taxation years after 2024

2(1) Subsection 117(2) of the Income Tax Act is replaced by the following: (2) The tax payable under this Part by an individual on the individual’s taxable income or taxable income earned in Canada, as the case may be (in this Subdivision referred to as the “amount taxable”) for a taxation year is (a) 14.5 % of the amount taxable, if the amount taxable is equal to or less than the amount determined for the taxation year in respect of $ 57,375 ; (b) if the amount taxable is greater than $ 57,375 , but is equal to or less than $ 114,750 , the maximum amount determinable in respect of the taxation year under paragraph (a), plus 20.5% of the amount by which the amount taxable exceeds $ 57,375 for the year; (c) if the amount taxable is greater than $ 114,750 , but is equal to or less than $ 177,882 , the maximum amount determinable in respect of the taxation year under paragraph (b), plus 26% of the amount by which the amount taxable exceeds $ 114,750 for the year; (d) if the amount taxable is greater than $ 177,882 , but is equal to or less than $ 253,414 , the maximum amount determinable in respect of the taxation year under paragraph (c), plus 29% of the amount by which the amount taxable exceeds $ 177,882 for the year; and (e) if the amount taxable is greater than $ 253,414 , the maximum amount determinable in respect of the taxation year under paragraph (d), plus 33% of the amount by which the amount taxable exceeds $ 253,414 for the year. (2) Paragraph 117(2)(a) of the Act, as enacted by subsection (1), is amended by replacing “14.5%” with “14%”. (3) Subsection (1) applies to the 2025 and subsequent taxation years. (4) Subsection (2) applies to the 2026 and subsequent taxation years.

PART 2Temporary GST housing rebate for buyers
What it does

This part amends the Excise Tax Act to introduce a temporary GST rebate for first-time home buyers, effective from May 27, 2025, for agreements made before 2031. The rebate applies under specific conditions related to the purchase and occupancy of residential properties.

Why it matters

This measure aims to assist first-time home buyers in affording their homes, which can mitigate housing affordability issues in Canada. It also seeks to stimulate the housing market by encouraging new purchases and renovations.

The problem it addresses

The bill addresses the increasing difficulties faced by first-time home buyers in accessing affordable housing amid rising property prices.

Who benefits

First-time home buyers gain financial relief through tax rebates, making it easier for them to enter the housing market.

The tradeoff

This creates a cost to taxpayers through foregone tax revenue, which might affect public services funding; taxpayers at large share this burden while benefiting only those qualifying as first-time home buyers.

first-time home buyersreal estate developerstaxpayersgovernment agenciescooperative housing entities

Amends: Amendments to the Excise Tax Act and Related Regulations

Read the actual text (12)

3(1) Subsection 123(1) of the Excise Tax Act is amended by adding the following in alphabetical order: first-time home buyer , at a particular time, means a particular individual in respect of whom the following conditions are met: (a) the particular individual is 18 years of age or older at the particular time, (b) the particular individual is, at the particular time, a Canadian citizen or permanent resident within the meaning of subsection 2(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act , (c) at no time in the period that begins at the beginning of the fourth preceding calendar year that ended before the particular time and that ends on the day before the day that includes the particular time did the particular individual occupy a residential unit situated in or outside Canada as their primary place of residence while being an owner of (i) the residential complex in which the residential unit is located, (ii) the building, or a part of the building, in which the residential unit is located, (iii) in the case of a residential unit situated in Canada, a share of the capital stock of a cooperative housing corporation which entitles the particular individual to possess the residential unit, or (iv) in the case of a residential unit situated outside Canada, a share of the capital stock of, or an interest in, an entity that is similar to a cooperative housing corporation, which share or interest entitles the particular individual to possess the residential unit, and (d) if another individual is a spouse or common-law partner of the particular individual at the particular time, at no time in the period referred to in paragraph (c) did the particular individual occupy a residential unit situated in or outside Canada as their primary place of residence while the other individual is an owner of (i) the residential complex in which the residential unit is located, (ii) the building, or a part of the building, in which the residential unit is located, (iii) in the case of a residential unit situated in Canada, a share of the capital stock of a cooperative housing corporation which entitles the other individual to possess the residential unit, or (iv) in the case of a residential unit situated outside Canada, a share of the capital stock of, or an interest in, an entity that is similar to a cooperative housing corporation, which share or interest entitles the other individual to possess the residential unit; ( acheteur d’une première habitation ) (2) Subsection (1) is deemed to have come into force on May 27, 2025.

Additional new housing rebate — first-time home buyer

4(1) Subsections 254(2.01) to (2.1) of the Act are replaced by the following: (2.1) If (a) a particular individual is entitled to claim a rebate under subsection (2) in respect of a residential complex that is a single unit residential complex or a residential condominium unit or would be so entitled if the references in paragraphs (2)(c) and (i) to “$450,000” were read as “$1,500,000”, (b) the agreement of purchase and sale referred to in paragraph (2)(b) is entered into after May 26, 2025 and before 2031, (c) the construction or substantial renovation of the residential complex begins before 2031 and is substantially completed before 2036, (d) ownership of the residential complex is transferred to the particular individual before 2036, and (e) the particular individual (i) at the time the particular individual becomes liable or assumes liability under the agreement of purchase and sale, is acquiring the residential complex for use as their primary place of residence, (ii) is the first individual to occupy the residential complex as a place of residence after the construction or substantial renovation of the residential complex is substantially completed, and (iii) is a first-time home buyer at the particular time at which ownership of the residential complex is transferred to the particular individual, the Minister shall, subject to subsection (3), pay a rebate to the particular individual, in addition to the rebate, if any, payable under subsection (2) to the particular individual, equal to (f) if the total consideration, within the meaning of paragraph (2)(c), in respect of the residential complex is not more than $1,000,000, the amount determined by the formula A − B where A is the lesser of $50,000 and the total tax paid by the particular individual, within the meaning of paragraph (2)(d), in respect of the residential complex, and B is the amount of the rebate, if any, under subsection (2) that the particular individual is entitled to claim in respect of the residential complex, and (g) if the total consideration, within the meaning of paragraph (2)(c), in respect of the residential complex is more than $1,000,000 but less than $1,500,000, the amount determined by the formula C × [($1,500,000 − D) ÷ $500,000] where C is the lesser of $50,000 and the total tax paid by the particular individual, within the meaning of paragraph (2)(d), in respect of the residential complex, and D is the total consideration. (2) Subsection (1) is deemed to have come into force on May 27, 2025.

Additional building-only rebate — first-time home buyer

5(1) Subsections 254.1(2.01) to (2.1) of the Act are replaced by the following: (2.1) If (a) a particular individual is entitled to claim a rebate under subsection (2) in respect of a residential complex or would be so entitled if the references in paragraphs (2)(c) and (i) to “$472,500” were read as “$1,575,000”, (b) the agreement referred to in paragraph (2)(a) is entered into after May 26, 2025 and before 2031, (c) the construction or substantial renovation of the residential complex begins before 2031 and is substantially completed before 2036, (d) possession of the residential complex is transferred to the particular individual before 2036, and (e) the particular individual (i) at the time the particular individual becomes liable or assumes liability under the agreement, is acquiring the residential complex for use as their primary place of residence, (ii) is the first individual to occupy the residential complex as a place of residence after the construction or substantial renovation of the residential complex is substantially completed, and (iii) is a first-time home buyer at the particular time at which possession of the residential complex is transferred to the particular individual, the Minister shall, subject to subsection (3), pay a rebate to the particular individual, in addition to the rebate, if any, payable under subsection (2) to the particular individual, equal to (f) if the fair market value of the residential complex referred to in paragraph (2)(c) is not more than $1,050,000, the amount determined by the formula A − B where A is the lesser of $50,000 and 4.77% of the total consideration, within the meaning of paragraph (2)(h), in respect of the residential complex, and B is the amount of the rebate, if any, under subsection (2) that the particular individual is entitled to claim in respect of the residential complex, and (g) if the fair market value of the residential complex referred to in paragraph (2)(c) is more than $1,050,000 but less than $1,575,000, the amount determined by the formula C × [($1,575,000 − D) ÷ $525,000] where C is the lesser of $50,000 and 4.77% of the total consideration, within the meaning of paragraph (2)(h), in respect of the residential complex, and D is the fair market value. (2) Subsection (1) is deemed to have come into force on May 27, 2025.

Additional cooperative housing rebate — first-time home buyer

6(1) Subsections 255(2.01) to (2.1) of the Act are replaced by the following: (2.1) If (a) a particular individual is entitled to claim a rebate under subsection (2) in respect of a share of the capital stock of a cooperative housing corporation that entitles the particular individual to the possession of a residential unit in a residential complex or the particular individual would be entitled to claim a rebate under subsection (2) in respect of such a share if the references in paragraphs (2)(d) and (h) to “$472,500” were read as “$1,575,000”, (b) the agreement of purchase and sale referred to in paragraph (2)(c) is entered into after May 26, 2025 and before 2031, (c) the construction or substantial renovation of the residential complex begins before 2031 and is substantially completed before 2036, (d) ownership of the share is transferred to the particular individual before 2036, and (e) the particular individual (i) at the time the particular individual becomes liable or assumes liability under the agreement of purchase and sale, is acquiring the share for the purpose of using the residential unit as their primary place of residence, (ii) is the first individual to occupy the residential unit as a place of residence after possession of the residential unit is transferred to the particular individual, and (iii) is a first-time home buyer at the particular time at which ownership of the share is transferred to the particular individual, the Minister shall, subject to subsection (3), pay a rebate to the particular individual, in addition to the rebate, if any, payable under subsection (2) to the particular individual, equal to (f) if the total consideration within the meaning of paragraph (2)(d), in respect of the share and any interest in the cooperative housing corporation or the residential complex, is not more than $1,050,000, the amount determined by the formula A − B where A is the lesser of $50,000 and 4.77% of the total consideration, and B is the amount of the rebate, if any, under subsection (2) that the particular individual is entitled to claim in respect of the share, and (g) if the total consideration within the meaning of paragraph (2)(d), in respect of the share and any interest in the cooperative housing corporation or the residential complex, is more than $1,050,000 but less than $1,575,000, the amount determined by the formula C × [($1,575,000 − D) ÷ $525,000] where C is the lesser of $50,000 and 4.77% of the total consideration, and D is the total consideration. (2) Subsection (1) is deemed to have come into force on May 27, 2025.

Additional owner-built home rebate — first-time home buyer

7(1) Subsections 256(2.01) to (2.1) of the Act are replaced by the following: (2.1) If (a) a particular individual is entitled to claim a rebate under subsection (2) in respect of a residential complex that is a single unit residential complex or a residential condominium unit or would be so entitled if the references in that subsection to “$450,000” were read as “$1,500,000”, (b) the construction or substantial renovation of the residential complex begins after May 26, 2025 and before 2031 and is substantially completed before 2036, and (c) the particular individual (i) is the individual for whom the residential complex is being constructed or substantially renovated for use as their primary place of residence, (ii) is the first individual to occupy the residential complex as a place of residence after the construction or substantial renovation of the residential complex is begun, (iii) first occupies the residential complex as a place of residence before 2036, and (iv) is a first-time home buyer at the particular time that is the earlier of the time at which the residential complex is first occupied by the particular individual as a place of residence and the time at which the construction or substantial renovation of the residential complex is substantially completed, the Minister shall, subject to subsection (3), pay a rebate to the particular individual, in addition to the rebate, if any, payable under subsection (2) to the particular individual, equal to the amount determined by the formula A × [($1,500,000 − B) ÷ $500,000] − C where A is the lesser of $50,000 and the total tax paid by the particular individual, within the meaning of paragraph (2)(c), in respect of the residential complex before (i) if the fair market value of the residential complex referred to in paragraph (2)(b) is less than $450,000, an application for the rebate under subsection (2) in respect of the residential complex is filed with the Minister in accordance with subsection (3), and (ii) in any other case, an application for the rebate under this subsection in respect of the residential complex is filed with the Minister in accordance with subsection (3), B is the greater of $1,000,000 and the fair market value of the residential complex referred to in paragraph (2)(b), and C is the amount of the rebate, if any, under subsection (2) that the particular individual is entitled to claim in respect of the residential complex. Homes occupied before substantial completion ( 2.11 ) If an individual acquires an improvement in respect of a residential complex that the individual is constructing or substantially renovating and tax in respect of the improvement becomes payable by the individual more than two years after the day the residential complex is first occupied as described in subparagraph (2)(d)(i) or (2.1)(c)(ii), as applicable , that tax shall not be included in determining the total tax paid by the individual within the meaning of paragraph (2)(c). (2) Paragraphs 256(2.2)(a) and (b) of the Act are replaced by the following: (a) a particular individual purchases or imports a mobile home or floating home that has never been used or occupied by any individual as a place of residence or lodging and does not file with the Minister, or submit to the supplier, an application for a rebate in respect of the home under any of subsections 254(2) and (2.1) and 254.1(2) and (2.1) , (b) the particular individual is acquiring or importing the mobile home or floating home for use as the primary place of residence of the particular individual or of a relation of the particular individual, and (3) Subsections (1) and (2) are deemed to have come into force on May 27, 2025.

8(1) The description of C in subsection 256.2(4) of the Act is replaced by the following: C is the total of (i) the amount of the rebate, if any, under subsection 254.1(2) that the recipient of the exempt supply by way of sale is entitled to claim in respect of the complex or unit, and (ii) the amount of the rebate, if any, under subsection 254.1(2.1) that the recipient of the exempt supply by way of sale is entitled to claim in respect of the complex or unit. (2) The description of C in subsection 256.2(5) of the Act is replaced by the following: C is the total of (i) the amount of the rebate, if any, under subsection 255(2) that the recipient of the exempt supply of the unit was entitled to claim in respect of the unit, and (ii) the amount of the rebate, if any, under subsection 255(2.1) that the recipient of the exempt supply of the unit was entitled to claim in respect of the unit. (3) Subsections (1) and (2) are deemed to have come into force on May 27, 2025.

9(1) Paragraph 262(3)(a) of the Act is replaced by the following: (a) subject to paragraphs (b) to (c.1) , the references in sections 254 to 256 to a particular individual shall be read as references to all of those individuals as a group; (2) Subsection 262(3) of the Act is amended by striking out “and” at the end of paragraph (c) and by replacing paragraph (d) with the following: (c.1) the references in paragraphs 254(2.1)(e), 254.1(2.1)(e), 255(2.1)(e) and 256(2.1)(c), in the description of B in each of paragraphs 254(2.1)(f), 254.1(2.1)(f) and 255(2.1)(f) and in the description of C in subsection 256(2.1) to the particular individual are to be read as references to any of those individuals; (d) only one of those individuals may apply for the rebate under subsection 254(2), 254.1(2), 255(2) or 256(2) , as the case may be, in respect of the complex or share; and (e) only one of those individuals may apply for the rebate under subsection 254(2.1), 254.1(2.1), 255(2.1) or 256(2.1), as the case may be, in respect of the complex or share and the individual that applies for that rebate must meet the criteria set out in paragraph 254(2.1)(e), 254.1(2.1)(e), 255(2.1)(e) or 256(2.1)(c), as the case may be. (3) Subsections (1) and (2) are deemed to have come into force on May 27, 2025.

Making an application

10(1) The Act is amended by adding the following after section 263.2: 263.3 (1) For the purposes of this section, an individual makes an application if they file an application with the Minister or submit an application to a builder. Restriction on rebate — first-time home buyer (2) A particular rebate under subsection 254(2.1), 254.1(2.1), 255(2.1) or 256(2.1), for which a particular individual makes an application, shall not be paid if (a) after May 26, 2025 and before the particular time referred to in subparagraph 254(2.1)(e)(iii), 254.1(2.1)(e)(iii), 255(2.1)(e)(iii) or 256(2.1)(c)(iv), as the case may be, the particular individual, or another individual who is at the particular time a spouse or common-law partner of the particular individual, makes an application for another rebate under any of those subsections; and (b) the particular individual or the other individual, as the case may be, is entitled to the other rebate. Deemed application — spouse or common-law partner (3) If, after May 26, 2025, a particular individual makes an application for, and is entitled to, a rebate under subsection 254(2.1), 254.1(2.1), 255(2.1) or 256(2.1), if the rebate is payable to a group of individuals and if another individual who is a member of that group is a spouse or common-law partner of the particular individual at the particular time referred to in subparagraph 254(2.1)(e)(iii), 254.1(2.1)(e)(iii), 255(2.1)(e)(iii) or 256(2.1)(c)(iv), as the case may be, the other individual is deemed, for the purposes of subsection (2), to file at the particular time an application for the rebate and to be entitled to the rebate.

Definition of agreement of sale

263.4(1) For the purposes of this section, agreement of sale , in respect of a residential complex, means an agreement that is entered into by a builder of the residential complex or by a cooperative housing corporation that owns the residential complex and under which the following is supplied by way of sale: (a) in the case of a builder, (i) the residential complex, or (ii) a building or part of a building in which a residential unit forming part of the residential complex is located; or (b) in the case of a cooperative housing corporation, a share of the capital stock of the cooperative housing corporation, the holder of which is entitled to possession of a residential unit located in the residential complex. Non-arm’s length — groups of individuals (2) For the purposes of this section, (a) a group of individuals and a particular individual are not dealing with each other at arm’s length if (i) the particular individual is a member of the group, or (ii) the particular individual is not dealing at arm’s length with one or more members of the group; and (b) a particular group of individuals and another group of individuals are not dealing with each other at arm’s length if (i) one or more individuals are members of both groups, or (ii) one or more members of the particular group are not dealing at arm’s length with one or more members of the other group. First-time home buyer rebates — variation, alteration or assignment (3) For the purposes of subsections (4) and (5) and paragraphs 254(2.1)(b), 254.1(2.1)(b) and 255(2.1)(b), if an agreement of sale in respect of a residential complex is entered into before May 27, 2025 and the agreement of sale is later varied, altered or assigned such that it is considered to be entered into after May 26, 2025, the agreement of sale is deemed to have been entered into before May 27, 2025. First-time home buyer rebates — new agreement (4) For the purposes of subsections (3) and (5) and paragraphs 254(2.1)(b), 254.1(2.1)(b) and 255(2.1)(b), if (a) before May 27, 2025, a particular person that is a builder or a cooperative housing corporation and a particular individual enter into a particular agreement of sale in respect of a particular residential complex, (b) after May 26, 2025, (i) the particular person and the particular individual, either directly or indirectly, terminate the particular agreement of sale, and (ii) the particular individual, another individual that is not dealing at arm’s length with the particular individual or a group of individuals that is not dealing at arm’s length with the particular individual enters into another agreement of sale in respect of the particular residential complex or in respect of another residential complex with (A) the particular person, (B) another person that is a builder or a cooperative housing corporation and that is not dealing at arm’s length with the particular person, or (C) if the particular person is a builder, another person that is a builder of the particular residential complex, and (c) the entering into of the other agreement of sale may not reasonably be considered for the particular individual, the other individual or the group, as the case may be, to have been undertaken or arranged primarily for bona fide purposes other than to obtain a rebate under any of subsections 254(2.1), 254.1(2.1) and 255(2.1), the other agreement of sale is deemed to have been entered into before May 27, 2025. First-time home buyer rebates — new agreement (5) For the purposes of subsections (3) and (4) and paragraphs 254(2.1)(b), 254.1(2.1)(b) and 255(2.1)(b), if (a) before May 27, 2025, a particular person that is a builder or a cooperative housing corporation and a particular group of individuals enter into a particular agreement of sale in respect of a particular residential complex, (b) after May 26, 2025, (i) the particular person and the particular group, either directly or indirectly, terminate the particular agreement of sale, and (ii) the particular group, an individual that is not dealing at arm’s length with the particular group or another group of individuals that is not dealing at arm’s length with the particular group enters into another agreement of sale in respect of the particular residential complex or in respect of another residential complex with (A) the particular person, (B) another person that is a builder or a cooperative housing corporation and that is not dealing at arm’s length with the particular person, or (C) if the particular person is a builder, another person that is a builder of the particular residential complex, and (c) the entering into of the other agreement of sale may not reasonably be considered for the particular group, the individual or the other group, as the case may be, to have been undertaken or arranged primarily for bona fide purposes other than to obtain a rebate under any of subsections 254(2.1), 254.1(2.1) and 255(2.1), the other agreement of sale is deemed to have been entered into before May 27, 2025.

11(1) Sections 15 to 18 of the Nova Scotia HST Regulations, 2010 are repealed. (2) Subsection (1) is deemed to have come into force on May 27, 2025.

Amounts and rates for participating provinces

12(1) The New Harmonized Value-added Tax System Regulations, No. 2 are amended by adding the following after section 42: 42.1 In applying subsection 254.1(2.1) of the Act in respect of (a) a residential complex situated in Ontario, (i) the references in that subsection to “$1,575,000” are to be read as references to “$1,695,000”, (ii) the references in that subsection to “$1,050,000” are to be read as references to “$1,130,000”, (iii) the reference in that subsection to “$525,000” is to be read as a reference to “$565,000”, and (iv) the references in the description of A in the formula in paragraph (f) and in the description of C in the formula in paragraph (g) of that subsection to “4.77%” are to be read as references to “4.43%”; (b) a residential complex situated in Nova Scotia, (i) the references in that subsection to “$1,575,000” are to be read as references to “$1,710,000”, (ii) the references in that subsection to “$1,050,000” are to be read as references to “$1,140,000”, (iii) the reference in that subsection to “$525,000” is to be read as a reference to “$570,000”, and (iv) the references in the description of A in the formula in paragraph (f) and in the description of C in the formula in paragraph (g) of that subsection to “4.77%” are to be read as references to “4.39%”; (c) a residential complex situated in New Brunswick, (i) the references in that subsection to “$1,575,000” are to be read as references to “$1,725,000”, (ii) the references in that subsection to “$1,050,000” are to be read as references to “$1,150,000”, (iii) the reference in that subsection to “$525,000” is to be read as a reference to “$575,000”, and (iv) the references in the description of A in the formula in paragraph (f) and in the description of C in the formula in paragraph (g) of that subsection to “4.77%” are to be read as references to “4.35%”; (d) a residential complex situated in Prince Edward Island, (i) the references in that subsection to “$1,575,000” are to be read as references to “$1,725,000”, (ii) the references in that subsection to “$1,050,000” are to be read as references to “$1,150,000”, (iii) the reference in that subsection to “$525,000” is to be read as a reference to “$575,000”, and (iv) the references in the description of A in the formula in paragraph (f) and in the description of C in the formula in paragraph (g) of that subsection to “4.77%” are to be read as references to “4.35%”; and (e) a residential complex situated in Newfoundland and Labrador, (i) the references in that subsection to “$1,575,000” are to be read as references to “$1,725,000”, (ii) the references in that subsection to “$1,050,000” are to be read as references to “$1,150,000”, (iii) the reference in that subsection to “$525,000” is to be read as a reference to “$575,000”, and (iv) the references in the description of A in the formula in paragraph (f) and in the description of C in the formula in paragraph (g) of that subsection to “4.77%” are to be read as references to “4.35%”.

Amounts and rates for participating provinces

13(1) The Regulations are amended by adding the following after section 44: 44.1 In applying subsection 255(2.1) of the Act in respect of (a) a residential complex situated in Ontario, (i) the references in that subsection to “$1,575,000” are to be read as references to “$1,695,000”, (ii) the references in that subsection to “$1,050,000” are to be read as references to “$1,130,000”, (iii) the reference in that subsection to “$525,000” is to be read as a reference to “$565,000”, and (iv) the references in the description of A in the formula in paragraph (f) and in the description of C in the formula in paragraph (g) of that subsection to “4.77%” are to be read as references to “4.43%”; (b) a residential complex situated in Nova Scotia, (i) the references in that subsection to “$1,575,000” are to be read as references to “$1,710,000”, (ii) the references in that subsection to “$1,050,000” are to be read as references to “$1,140,000”, (iii) the reference in that subsection to “$525,000” is to be read as a reference to “$570,000”, and (iv) the references in the description of A in the formula in paragraph (f) and in the description of C in the formula in paragraph (g) of that subsection to “4.77%” are to be read as references to “4.39%”; (c) a residential complex situated in New Brunswick, (i) the references in that subsection to “$1,575,000” are to be read as references to “$1,725,000”, (ii) the references in that subsection to “$1,050,000” are to be read as references to “$1,150,000”, (iii) the reference in that subsection to “$525,000” is to be read as a reference to “$575,000”, and (iv) the references in the description of A in the formula in paragraph (f) and in the description of C in the formula in paragraph (g) of that subsection to “4.77%” are to be read as references to “4.35%”; (d) a residential complex situated in Prince Edward Island, (i) the references in that subsection to “$1,575,000” are to be read as references to “$1,725,000”, (ii) the references in that subsection to “$1,050,000” are to be read as references to “$1,150,000”, (iii) the reference in that subsection to “$525,000” is to be read as a reference to “$575,000”, and (iv) the references in the description of A in the formula in paragraph (f) and in the description of C in the formula in paragraph (g) of that subsection to “4.77%” are to be read as references to “4.35%”; and (e) a residential complex situated in Newfoundland and Labrador, (i) the references in that subsection to “$1,575,000” are to be read as references to “$1,725,000”, (ii) the references in that subsection to “$1,050,000” are to be read as references to “$1,150,000”, (iii) the reference in that subsection to “$525,000” is to be read as a reference to “$575,000”, and (iv) the references in the description of A in the formula in paragraph (f) and in the description of C in the formula in paragraph (g) of that subsection to “4.77%” are to be read as references to “4.35%”.

PART 3Repeal of Greenhouse Gas Pricing Regulations
What it does

This part of the bill repeals several sections of the Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act and related Fuel Charge Regulations, effectively eliminating the mechanisms for greenhouse gas pricing that were previously established.

Why it matters

This action could significantly impact Canada's ability to manage greenhouse gas emissions and meet climate commitments, affecting environmental policies and the move towards sustainability. It also alters the economic landscape for industries subject to these regulations.

The problem it addresses

The bill addresses concerns about the effectiveness or desirability of the existing greenhouse gas pricing mechanisms.

Who benefits

Industries and businesses that were previously subject to greenhouse gas pricing may benefit from reduced regulatory and financial burdens.

The tradeoff

The most significant tradeoff is the potential decrease in environmental protection and climate action, as the repeal may hinder Canada's efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, impacting future generations and public health.

environmental advocatesbusinesses in carbon-heavy industriesregulatory agenciesgeneral publicclimate action organizations

Amends: Amendments to the Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act and the Fuel Charge Regulations

Read the actual text (29)

14Subdivision A of Division 2 of Part 1 of the Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act is repealed.

15Section 34 of the Act is repealed.

16Section 35 of the Act is repealed.

17Subdivisions C and D of Division 2 of Part 1 of the Act are repealed.

18Sections 43 to 48 of the Act are repealed.

19Sections 55 to 65 of the Act are repealed.

20Part 1 of the Act is repealed.

21Part 1 of Schedule 1 to the Act is repealed.

22Schedule 2 to the Act is repealed.

23Part 2 of the Fuel Charge Regulations is repealed.

24Part 3 of the Regulations is repealed.

25Part 4 of the Regulations is repealed.

26Sections 7 to 10 of the Regulations are repealed.

27Part 5 of the Regulations is repealed.

28Sections 12 to 16 of the Regulations are repealed.

29Part 6 of the Regulations is repealed.

30Section 19 of the Regulations is repealed.

31Section 20 of the Regulations is repealed.

32Section 28 of the Regulations is repealed.

33Part 9 of the Regulations is repealed.

34Sections 29 to 31 of the Regulations are repealed.

35Part 10 of the Regulations is repealed.

36Sections 33 to 41 of the Regulations are repealed.

37The schedule to the Regulations is repealed.

2018, c. 12, s. 187

38The Fuel Charge Regulations are repealed.

39Sections 14 , 15 , 17 , 25 , 26 , 28 , 30 , 32 and 34 are deemed to have come into force on April 1, 2025.

40Sections 16 , 18 and 24 come into force or are deemed to have come into force on October 1, 2025.

41Sections 19 , 23 , 27 , 29 , 31 , 33 and 35 to 37 come into force or are deemed to have come into force on November 1, 2025.

42Sections 20 to 22 and 38 come into force on April 1, 2035.

PART 4Personal information protection for political parties
What it does

This part of the bill establishes requirements for political parties regarding the protection of personal information, including the need for a certified privacy policy and the appointment of a privacy officer. It provides a framework for how personal information can be collected, used, disclosed, retained, and disposed of by these parties.

Why it matters

This matters because the protection of personal information is critical for maintaining public trust in political parties and the electoral process. Ensuring that individuals' data is properly handled can prevent misuse that could affect voter privacy and integrity.

The problem it addresses

The provisions aim to address concerns about the handling of personal information by political parties, ensuring a standardized approach to data protection.

Who benefits

Individuals whose data is handled by political parties will benefit from clearer protections and oversight regarding their personal information.

The tradeoff

The most significant tradeoff involves the reduced oversight of how political parties handle personal information, as they can disregard provincial regulations unless their internal policies state otherwise, potentially limiting individuals' rights to access or correct their data.

Political partiesVotersPrivacy officersElection officialsVolunteers and employees of political parties

Amends: Canada Elections Act

Read the actual text (13)
Definition of personal information

43The Canada Elections Act is amended by adding the following after the heading of Division 2 of Part 18: Definition 384.9 In this Division, personal information means information about an identifiable individual.

44Section 385.1 of the Act is repealed.

45Section 385.2 of the Act is deemed never to have come into force and is repealed.

46Subsection 407(1) of the Act is amended by striking out “and” at the end of paragraph (a), by adding “and” at the end of paragraph (b) and by adding the following after paragraph (b): (c) a statement certified by its privacy officer that the party complies with its policy for the protection of personal information.

Definition of personal information

47The Act is amended by adding the following after section 446: SUBDIVISION C Personal Information Collected by Political Parties 446.1 In sections 446.2 to 446.4, personal information means information about an identifiable individual.

Purpose

446.2The purpose of the provisions of this Act related to the protection of personal information, including the provisions of this subdivision, is to provide for a national, uniform, exclusive and complete regime applicable to registered parties and eligible parties respecting their activities in relation to personal information, including the collection, use, disclosure, retention and disposal of personal information.

Activities in relation to personal information

446.3In order to participate in public affairs by endorsing one or more of its members as candidates and supporting their election, any registered party or eligible party, as well as any person or entity acting on the party’s behalf, including the party’s candidates, electoral district associations, officers, agents, employees, volunteers and representatives, may, subject to this Act and any other applicable federal Act, carry out any activities in relation to personal information, including the collection, use, disclosure, retention and disposal of personal information in accordance with the party’s policy for the protection of personal information.

Provincial or territorial Act

446.4(1) When participating in public affairs by endorsing one or more of its members as candidates and supporting their election, a registered party or eligible party, as well as any person or entity acting on the party’s behalf, including the party’s candidates, electoral district associations, officers, agents, employees, volunteers and representatives, cannot be required to comply with an Act of a province or territory that regulates activities in relation to personal information, including the collection, use, disclosure, retention and disposal of personal information, unless the party’s policy for the protection of personal information provides otherwise. For greater certainty (2) For greater certainty, the registered party, eligible party or person or entity acting on the party’s behalf cannot be required to provide access to personal information or provide information relating to personal information under its control or to correct — or receive, adjudicate or annotate requests to correct — personal information or omissions in personal information under its control.

Policy for the protection of personal information

446.5(1) A registered party or eligible party, as well as any person or entity acting on the party’s behalf, including the party’s candidates, electoral district associations, officers, agents, employees, volunteers and representatives, must comply with the party’s policy for the protection of personal information. Clarification (2) For greater certainty, a person or entity referred to in subsection (1) that fails to comply with the policy referred to in that subsection contravenes that subsection and commits a violation referred to in section 508.1.

Required contents

446.6The policy for the protection of personal information of a registered party or of an eligible party must be publicly available in both official languages, be written in plain language and (a) designate a privacy officer who is responsible for overseeing the party’s compliance with the policy; (b) include the name and contact information of the privacy officer; (c) state the types of personal information in relation to which the party carries out its activities; (d) explain, using illustrative examples, how the party carries out its activities in relation to personal information, such as by indicating whether it does so online or through the use of cookies; and (e) describe the training related to the protection of personal information that is offered to the party’s employees and volunteers who may have access to the personal information that is under its control.

Meetings relating to protecting personal information

446.7The Chief Electoral Officer shall hold at least one meeting each calendar year relating to the protection of personal information by registered parties and eligible parties.

48Section 446.1 of the Act is repealed.

May 31, 2000

49The headings before section 446.1 and sections 446.1 to 446.4 of the Canada Elections Act , as enacted by section 47 , are deemed to have come into force on May 31, 2000.

Official record· parl.ca
Official drafter summary (parl.ca)

Part 1 amends the Income Tax Act to reduce the marginal personal income tax rate on the lowest tax bracket to 14.‍5% for the 2025 taxation year and to 14% for the 2026 and subsequent taxation years. Part 2 amends the Excise Tax Act and other related Regulations to implement a temporary GST new housing rebate for first-time home buyers. Part 3 repeals Part 1 of the Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act and the Fuel Charge Regulations . Part 4 amends the Canada Elections Act to make changes to the requirements relating to political parties’ policies for the protection of personal information. Available on the House of Commons website at the following address: www.ourcommons.ca 3 - 4 Charles III CHAPTER 2 An Act respecting certain affordability measures for Canadians and another measure [ Assented to 12th March, 2026 ] His Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate and House of Commons of Canada, enacts as follows: Short Title Short title 1 This Act may be cited as the Making Life More Affordable for Canadians Act . PART 1 Income Tax Act R.‍S.‍, c. 1 (5th Supp.‍) 2 ( 1 ) Subsection 117 ( 2 ) of the Income Tax Act is replaced by the following: Rates for taxation years after 2024 ( 2 ) The tax payable under this Part by an individual on the individual’s taxable income or taxable income earned in Canada, as the case may be (in this Subdivision referred to as the “amount taxable”) for a taxation year is (a) 14.‍5 % of the amount taxable, if the amount taxable is equal to or less than the amount determined for the taxation year in respect of $ 57,375 ; (b) if the amount taxable is greater than $ 57,375, but is equal to or less than $ 114,750, the maximum amount determinable in respect of the taxation year under paragraph (a), plus 20.‍5 % of the amount by which the amount taxable exceeds $ 57,375 for the year; (c) if the amount taxable is greater than $ 114,750, but is equal to or less than $ 177,882, the maximum amount determinable in respect of the taxation year under paragraph (b), plus 26 % of the amount by which the amount taxable exceeds $ 114,750 for the year; (d) if the amount taxable is greater than $ 177,882, but is equal to or less than $ 253,414, the maximum amount determinable in respect of the taxation year under paragraph (c), plus 29 % of the amount by which the amount taxable exceeds $ 177,882 for the year; and (e) if the amount taxable is greater than $ 253,414, the maximum amount determinable in respect of the taxation year under paragraph (d), plus 33 % of the amount by which the amount taxable exceeds $ 253,414 for the year. ( 2 ) Paragraph 117 ( 2 )‍(a) of the Act, as enacted by subsection ( 1 ), is amended by replacing “ 14.‍5 %” with “ 14 %”. ( 3 ) Subsection ( 1 ) applies to the 2025 and subsequent taxation years. ( 4 ) Subsection ( 2 ) applies to the 2026 and subsequent taxation years. Report 2.‍1 ( 1 ) The Minister of Finance must prepare a report that outlines the impact of reducing the personal income tax rate provided in paragraph 117 ( 2 )‍(a) of the Income Tax Act on all tax credits that are calculated using the appropriate percentage as defined in that Act. Tabling ( 2 ) The Minister of Finance must cause the report to be tabled in each House of Parliament within 90 days after the day on which this section comes into force or, if the House is not then sitting, on any of the first 15 days of the next sitting of the House. Publication ( 3 ) The Minister of Finance must publish the report on the website of the Department of Finance within 10 days after the day on which the report is tabled in both Houses of Parliament. PART 2 Amendments to the Excise Tax Act and Related Regulations R.‍S.‍, c. E-15 Excise Tax Act 3 ( 1 ) Subsection 123 ( 1 ) of the Excise Tax Act is amended by adding the following in alphabetical order: first-time home buyer , at a particular time, means a particular individual in respect of whom the following conditions are met: (a) the particular individual is 18 years of age or older at the particular time, (b) the particular individual is, at the particular time, a Canadian citizen or permanent resident within the meaning of subsection 2 ( 1 ) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act , (c) at no time in the period that begins at the beginning of the fourth preceding calendar year that ended before the particular time and that ends on the day before the day that includes the particular time did the particular individual occupy a residential unit situated in or outside Canada as their primary place of residence while being an owner of (i) the residential complex in which the residential unit is located, (ii) the building, or a part of the building, in which the residential unit is located, (iii) in the case of a residential unit situated in Canada, a share of the capital stock of a cooperative housing corporation which entitles the particular individual to possess the residential unit, or (iv) in the case of a residential unit situated outside...

AI-assisted analysis
What MPs debatedCONTESTED422 speeches · 92 MPs · 110,851 words
Points of contention
  • The effectiveness of tax cuts and their impact on seniors and low-income individuals
  • Disagreement over the elimination of the consumer carbon tax vs. the industrial carbon tax
  • Disparities in benefits for first-time homebuyers compared to other demographics
  • Response to U.S. tariffs and their impact on Canadian industries

Opposition parties criticize the bill for inadequate support for vulnerable populations and economic consequences, while government asserts it provides necessary tax relief.

Where MPs stood80 MPs · grouped by party · ranked by speaking volume
AI-assisted analysis
CPC40 spoke · 0 support · 37 oppose
Garnett Genuis
Garnett GenuisOPPOSES8 speeches · 3,561 words
Argued that the government's spending is leading to higher unemployment.Canadians wanted change, but they did not want change in the direction of bigger government, more regulation, more waste, more spending and higher unemployment.
Billy Morin
Billy MorinOPPOSES11 speeches · 3,417 words
Criticized Bill C-4 for being a collection of half measures that fail to address the real causes of the affordability crisis.Bill C-4's collection of half measures does not deal with the real drivers of the affordability crisis: large deficits, high spending, and heavy taxation and regulation.
Kelly McCauley
Kelly McCauleyOPPOSES12 speeches · 2,708 words
Criticized the tax cut as negligible for middle-class families, pointing out meager savings of 13¢ daily for seniors and 38¢ for single parents.The average family will be spending over $600 more on food this year. I wonder if my colleague could comment on the so-called significant tax cut when the Liberals will not even cover half of the increase in food costs this year for the average family.
Jeremy Patzer
Jeremy PatzerOPPOSES7 speeches · 2,519 words
Criticized the bill for providing minimal tax benefits that do not help those most in need.The cost of inflation and the cost of food continue to go up... If the government was serious, this is the kind of thing it would look to address.
JM
Jacob MantleOPPOSES7 speeches · 2,209 words
Criticized the bill for being minimal and ineffective at addressing real affordability issues for Canadians.If the act is about affordability, but industry is telling us that this proposal would not do anything about that, then what is the point of it?
Grant Jackson
Grant JacksonOPPOSES6 speeches · 2,035 words
Criticized the government's record on spending and budgeting, highlighting a massive deficit and higher interest payments.This bill does not strike at the heart of the people who most need tax relief in this country. It screams of Liberal elitism, giving big tax breaks to the corporate elite in this country.
WS
William StevensonOPPOSES6 speeches · 2,000 words
Criticized the bill for not effectively addressing the affordability crisis faced by Canadians.The proposal included in the bill would help fewer Canadians than what our party campaigned on during the last election.
SB
Steven BonkOPPOSES5 speeches · 1,989 words
Criticized provisions that weaken oversight by removing provincial privacy commissioners.When that expectation is not met, the harm is not just legal or administrative. It is democratic.
Melissa Lantsman
Melissa LantsmanOPPOSES7 speeches · 1,932 words
Criticized the government's spending as irresponsible, stating it costs families $5,000 while only providing a small tax cut.If the government is giving somebody a small tax cut and on the other end charging them $5,000 for its irresponsible spending, Canadians are going to have a lot of questions.
Eric Melillo
Eric MelilloOPPOSES6 speeches · 1,867 words
Criticized the effectiveness of GST relief for first-time homebuyers, particularly for new homes which are rare in his region.These policies being brought forward in Bill C-4, however well-intentioned they may be, are largely missing the mark in terms of what Canadians are looking for and the relief that Canadians deserve.
Jasraj Hallan
Jasraj HallanOPPOSES4 speeches · 1,852 words
Criticized the bill for being a poor implementation of Conservative ideas while only providing minimal tax relief for workers.If the Liberals wanted to steal some of our ideas, why not just take all of them and let us get this country back on track to make it an energy superpower, like it once was?
Tako Van Popta
Tako Van PoptaOPPOSES7 speeches · 1,836 words
Criticized the bill as a result of economic mismanagement by the Liberal government over the past decade.On the affordability front, the best thing for the federal government to do to improve affordability for Canadians is to create an environment that encourages more private investment in innovation.
Anna Roberts
Anna RobertsOPPOSES5 speeches · 1,633 words
Criticized the bill for neglecting seniors and their unique challenges in affordability.Bill C-4 is a missed opportunity... it offers tax cuts and housing rebates, but nowhere in its pages, not once, does it mention the word 'seniors'.
Ellis Ross
Ellis RossOPPOSES4 speeches · 1,528 words
Criticized the Liberal government for not fully adopting Conservative ideas to improve affordability for Canadians.The costs and the unaffordability crisis Canadians are facing are real.
Michael Cooper
Michael CooperOPPOSES6 speeches · 1,464 words
Criticized the bill as a series of half measures that don't address the root costs of living issues.The best that can be said of the bill is that it is an admission of failure on the part of the Liberals, combined with a series of half measures.
Scott Anderson
Scott AndersonOPPOSES6 speeches · 1,445 words
Criticized the bill for failing to provide real solutions to the affordability crisis facing Canadians.Bill C-4 was presented as a step toward making life more affordable, but, buried beneath the talking points, what we actually find is yet another expansion of government control.
TJ
Tamara JansenOPPOSES5 speeches · 1,424 words
Criticized the bill as a political strategy rather than a real solution for affordability.This is not relief; it is optics. It was an election year, and it is a gimmick dressed up as a policy.
DB
David BexteOPPOSES5 speeches · 1,411 words
Criticized the bill for diluting Conservative principles and failing to truly address affordability issues.Bill C-4 simply does not go far enough to address the cost of living crisis facing Canadians.
AG
Amanpreet GillOPPOSES5 speeches · 1,369 words
Criticized the Liberal government's lack of a housing and job strategy alongside increased immigration levels.It is clear that the same Liberal ministers, with the same Liberal policies, are delivering even worse results.
EL
Eric LefebvreMIXED5 speeches · 1,352 words
Supported Bill C-4, arguing it takes a small step towards making life more affordable for Canadians.Bill C-4 aims to make life more affordable, but we would like to see it go even further.
CA
Chak AuOPPOSES4 speeches · 1,300 words
Criticized Bill C-4 as ineffective, arguing it offers 'pennies' in relief while the budget increases costs.Bill C-4 promises affordability but would not deliver. It gives pennies while the budget takes dollars.
Warren Steinley
Warren SteinleyOPPOSES2 speeches · 377 words
Criticized the government for causing the affordability crisis through irresponsible spending.The Liberal government caused the affordability crisis by spending money it did not have and creating inflation.
John Williamson
John WilliamsonOPPOSES2 speeches · 376 words
Criticized the government's tax-and-spend policies for driving down the Canadian dollar.High energy prices—
Arnold Viersen
Arnold ViersenOPPOSES4 speeches · 356 words
Criticized the bill as a return to outdated ideas like the carbon tax that Canadians rejected in the last election.This bill purports to do some of those things. Why is the member bringing these outdated ideas back to this place and not focusing on reducing hunger and poverty in this country?
Costas Menegakis
Costas MenegakisOPPOSES2 speeches · 344 words
Criticized the government's fiscal management, stating they have overspent the budget.More importantly, he also mentioned the Parliamentary Budget Officer. I have numbers here from the Parliamentary Budget Officer. What he said is that a single senior in the first income bracket would benefit from this budget, from these moves, to the tune of $50 a year.
Cathay Wagantall
Cathay WagantallOPPOSES3 speeches · 327 words
Argued that limiting the GST rebate to first-time homebuyers does not address the broader housing crisis.By spreading it out over more people, we could build those homes, and it would free up more of the other homes that our young people need.
Dan Muys
Dan MuysOPPOSES3 speeches · 304 words
Argued that the Prime Minister has not effectively addressed grocery price inflation in Canada.Are Canadians continuing to pedal backwards under the Liberals?
Gérard Deltell
Gérard DeltellNEUTRAL3 speeches · 281 words
Introduced a procedural point regarding technical issues during the debate.When we talk about Bill C-4, obviously we are talking about the carbon tax.
AL
Andrew LawtonOPPOSES2 speeches · 216 words
Argued that the consumer carbon tax is harmful to Canadians.I thank the hon. member for finally acknowledging what Conservatives have been talking about for years, which is how harmful the consumer carbon tax is for a great many Canadians.
Rhonda Kirkland
Rhonda KirklandOPPOSES3 speeches · 202 words
Questioned the effectiveness of the carbon tax in reducing emissions.My question is an honest one... Does he believe that the large emitters will pay that carbon tax, or does he think the carbon tax will be passed down to consumers?
Michael Guglielmin
Michael GuglielminOPPOSES3 speeches · 197 words
Criticized the government's lack of accountability in addressing economic issues.My question for my hon, colleague is, given the tariff threats and the threats to our economy, if the Liberal government is going to steal half of the Conservative policy in removing the consumer portion of the carbon tax, should they not go the whole way and remove the entire carbon tax for good?
CA
Carol AnsteyMIXED2 speeches · 185 words
Criticized the carbon tax for driving up costs, questioning the government's previous claims.Does he not now believe in the previous argument, or does he now agree the carbon tax did indeed drive up the cost of everything?
Brad Redekopp
Brad RedekoppOPPOSES1 speech · 153 words
Criticized the bill's tax reduction as minimal, stating it's only about $20 a month.I wonder if the member would consider changing the federal interim health benefits that asylum seekers get when they are denied asylum in Canada but are trying to stay on by appealing that decision.
Helena Konanz
Helena KonanzOPPOSES2 speeches · 152 words
Criticized the bill for not going far enough in addressing affordability issues.I think we all agree, at least on this side of the aisle, that this bill does not go far enough in a lot of its policies.
Chris Lewis
Chris LewisOPPOSES1 speech · 118 words
Argued that Bill C-4 fails to address the affordability crisis for young adults.Other than the industrial carbon tax, what falls short in Bill C-4 that would truly give young adults an opportunity...
Rob Moore
Rob MooreOPPOSES1 speech · 105 words
Argued that the Liberal government's actions on the carbon tax are contradictory and misleading.Every Canadian knows when they fill up at the pump that if they are not paying the carbon tax today, it is thanks to Pierre Poilievre and the Conservative team that rallied against it.
Clifford Small
Clifford SmallOPPOSES1 speech · 105 words
Criticized the current government's communication style as repetitive and ineffective.If they are tuned in, they are watching a rerun of a 10-year-old show...
Dan Albas
Dan AlbasOPPOSES1 speech · 84 words
Criticized the government's lack of transparency regarding the industrial carbon price.What is really important, especially when our steel industry and our aluminum industry are under attack, is the price itself.
BB
Burton BaileyOPPOSES1 speech · 82 words
Argued that the Liberal government's spending over the past 10 years has led to a dire situation for Canadians.the government seems to forget that there is only one taxpayer and that there is no such thing as government money.
Rosemarie Falk
Rosemarie FalkOPPOSES1 speech · 81 words
Argued that the government's taxes on food are real and impactful.If the government actually acknowledged that the taxes it has on food are not imaginary...
LPC25 spoke · 22 support · 3 oppose
Kevin Lamoureux
Kevin LamoureuxSUPPORTS47 speeches · 8,862 words
Argued that Bill C-4 provides significant tax relief for over 22 million Canadians.Bill C-4 is a critical piece of legislation... It delivers on an election commitment.
Kody Blois
Kody BloisSUPPORTS14 speeches · 4,675 words
Argued that Bill C-4 will lower taxes for 22 million Canadians, emphasizing its importance during affordability challenges.Bill C-4 is about a tax cut for 22 million Canadians. It is also about removing the GST on new homes for first-time homebuyers.
GD
Guillaume Deschênes-ThériaultSUPPORTS12 speeches · 3,964 words
Argued that Bill C-4 includes important measures like tax cuts for the middle class and a GST rebate for first-time homebuyers.With Bill C‑4, we are delivering by lowering taxes, eliminating the GST on the purchase price of a first home and eliminating the consumer carbon price.
FC
François-Philippe ChampagneSUPPORTS7 speeches · 2,586 words
Argued that Bill C-4 will implement a middle-class tax cut, benefiting over 22 million Canadians.Canadians asked for a serious plan to change how we address the rising cost of living, which has eroded their quality of life over the past few years.
Bardish Chagger
Bardish ChaggerSUPPORTS7 speeches · 2,284 words
Argued that the bill would benefit 22 million Canadians through tax relief and savings.It is indeed an honour and privilege to represent the amazing people of the riding of Waterloo and to speak to a bill that is really important and that many constituents have been speaking about.
Carlos Leitão
Carlos LeitãoSUPPORTS2 speeches · 1,785 words
Argued that Bill C-4 responds to the government's priority of making life more affordable for Canadians.The bill responds to our government's priority of building an economy that works for everyone and taking concrete steps to make life more affordable for Canadians.
John-Paul Danko
John-Paul DankoSUPPORTS3 speeches · 1,727 words
Argued that Bill C-4 is essential for making life more affordable for Canadians.The making life more affordable for Canadians act is our new government's immediate response to the rising cost of living in Canada.
Wade Chang
Wade ChangSUPPORTS5 speeches · 1,682 words
Argued that the government is committed to affordability measures like tax cuts and investments in housing.That is why our government is focusing on real, measurable relief by lowering taxes for the middle class, investing in housing and in child care, and helping people hold on to more of what they earn.
Julie Dzerowicz
Julie DzerowiczSUPPORTS5 speeches · 1,654 words
Argued that Bill C-4 provides meaningful relief for Canadians facing rising costs of living.Bill C-4 would deliver on that promise through three concrete measures.
Doug Eyolfson
Doug EyolfsonSUPPORTS6 speeches · 1,594 words
Argued that Bill C-4 is a crucial step to address affordability challenges faced by Canadians.Today, through Bill C-4, we are doing just that. Bill C-4 addresses one of the most pressing and immediate challenges facing Canadians in every corner of the country: affordability.
JR
Jacques RamsaySUPPORTS6 speeches · 1,580 words
Argued that the affordability bill will help first-time homebuyers by exempting them from paying GST on new homes.The affordability bill will exempt first-time homebuyers from paying GST on new homes, saving them up to $50,000.
Steeve Lavoie
Steeve LavoieSUPPORTS5 speeches · 1,562 words
Argued that Bill C-4 directly benefits middle-class families by lowering the tax rate from 15% to 14%, enabling significant savings.I want to be clear from the outset: This bill is good for us. It is good for families, workers, students and seniors. It is good for all Canadians.
Jean-Yves Duclos
Jean-Yves DuclosSUPPORTS8 speeches · 1,536 words
Supported tax cuts for 22 million Canadians, reducing the lowest tax rate from 15% to 14%, providing up to $420 per taxpayer.I rise today in support of Bill C-4, the making life more affordable for Canadians act.
MM
Michael MaOPPOSES6 speeches · 1,523 words
Criticized the bill as ineffective due to the larger context of deficit spending.The $90-per-month benefit in Bill C-4 is wiped out by the $5,000-per-household cost of deficit spending in the new Liberal budget.
Bienvenu-Olivier Ntumba
Bienvenu-Olivier NtumbaSUPPORTS7 speeches · 682 words
Argued that the bill is good news for families and Canadians, improving their ability to live with dignity.I am pleased and proud to rise in this honourable chamber to applaud the introduction of this affordability bill.
JD
John-Paul DankoSUPPORTS2 speeches · 269 words
Argued that down payments are a major challenge for young families entering the housing market.We want to avoid a situation where young families have to save and work really hard for 10 or 20 years just to afford a down payment if they do not have access to generational wealth.
Will Greaves
Will GreavesSUPPORTS2 speeches · 255 words
Argued for the government's commitment to environmental protection alongside energy extraction.However, we know the Conservatives are not entirely opposed to environmental policy, because they love recycling.
MG
Mark GerretsenSUPPORTS2 speeches · 168 words
Argued that the bill represents a smart move for Canadians.A smart move.
Maninder Sidhu
Maninder SidhuOPPOSES1 speech · 160 words
Opposed the Senate amendment, arguing that Parliament should decide the rules governing communication by federal parties.Parliament should be the body that decides the rules that govern communication by federal parties with Canadians.
NJ
Natilien JosephSUPPORTS2 speeches · 156 words
Argued that opposition parties are inconsistent in their positions and responsibilities.Do Quebeckers not deserve to finally find out whether these parties are choosing to stand on principle or whether they are choosing to score easy political points?
KM
Kent MacDonaldSUPPORTS2 speeches · 147 words
Argued the importance of making life more affordable for Canadians.The message I heard when I was going door to door was that we had to make life more affordable.
SA
Sima AcanSUPPORTS1 speech · 131 words
Argued that Bill C-4 includes practical measures to provide immediate relief to families.Bill C-4... puts forward three practical measures that would provide immediate relief for families: lowering taxes for nearly 22 million Canadians...
Lori Idlout
Lori IdloutOPPOSES2 speeches · 128 words
Criticized the inclusion of amendments to repeal sections of the Elections Act in Bill C-4.I have noticed that it has amendments to repeal sections of the Elections Act, which seem to have nothing to do with affordability measures.
Viviane Lapointe
Viviane LapointeSUPPORTS1 speech · 97 words
Congratulated the MP on their first address in the House.As it relates to Bill C-4, we are offering a tax break for young families trying to buy their first home.
AK
Arielle KayabagaSUPPORTS1 speech · 86 words
Congratulated a colleague on their re-election, reinforcing a collaborative tone.Can my hon. colleague tell us, here in the House, that he and his party will support the measures we introduced to meet the demands that Canadians made of us during the election?
BQ12 spoke · 0 support · 8 oppose
Jean-Denis Garon
Jean-Denis GaronMIXED15 speeches · 5,744 words
Criticized the government for introducing poorly crafted and rushed policies in Bill C-4, particularly concerning tax cuts that negatively impact vulnerable groups.We do agree with some of the measures, particularly the GST rebate for first-time buyers purchasing a new home. However, this was essentially an election stunt and should be viewed as such.
PB
Patrick BoninOPPOSES17 speeches · 4,350 words
Criticized the government's refusal to meet Quebec's demands, including the return of $814 million.The Bloc Québécois strongly opposes this environmentally irresponsible behaviour.
Xavier Barsalou-Duval
Xavier Barsalou-DuvalOPPOSES11 speeches · 3,204 words
Criticized the government for lacking a budget and clear financial plan, questioning its priorities.We have a government that decided to request new funding for new spending. However, it does not have a budget.
SL
Sébastien LemireOPPOSES6 speeches · 2,349 words
Opposed the bill due to insufficient support for Quebeckers' real needs.In short, these tax savings are interesting, but they will raise the cost of other services that taxpayers are entitled to receive.
Yves Perron
Yves PerronOPPOSES4 speeches · 2,171 words
Opposed Bill C-4 due to issues with the carbon tax and environmental policies.The Bloc Québécois is going to oppose Bill C-4... we must oppose Bill C‑4, particularly due to the measure concerning the price on pollution.
Marilène Gill
Marilène GillMIXED7 speeches · 1,649 words
Argued that the government's lack of a budget is irresponsible and creates uncertainty about economic measures.In fact, it is totally irresponsible on the government's part ... that is why a motion was moved, calling on the government to table a budget before the end of spring.
Simon-Pierre Savard-Tremblay
Simon-Pierre Savard-TremblayMIXED4 speeches · 460 words
Argued the provisions on home ownership in the bill are somewhat acceptable but lack measures for down payments.The provisions of the bill on access to home ownership are not that bad. We more or less agree with them.
Mario Beaulieu
Mario BeaulieuOPPOSES4 speeches · 285 words
Criticized the tax cut for potentially increasing taxes for seniors and people with disabilities.This bill is poorly thought out.
Claude DeBellefeuille
Claude DeBellefeuilleOPPOSES1 speech · 173 words
Criticized the abolition of the carbon tax as unfair to residents of British Columbia and Quebec.Does the member consider that to be a normal, fair and equitable way of operating?
Alexis Brunelle-Duceppe
Alexis Brunelle-DuceppeOPPOSES2 speeches · 159 words
Criticized the government for not protecting Quebec's economic interests.How does it feel to be a Quebec MP who is going against the will of the Quebec National Assembly?
Marie-Hélène Gaudreau
Marie-Hélène GaudreauOPPOSES2 speeches · 149 words
Criticized the government's budget as merely 'smoke and mirrors' aimed at winning votes.no one can convince me that that is an investment, per se.
Rhéal Éloi Fortin
Rhéal Éloi FortinMIXED1 speech · 140 words
Argued that economic measures and environmental concerns are not mutually exclusive.Is taking care of the environment and leaving a healthy, viable planet for our children really at odds with investing today to enable families to put food on the table and a roof over their heads?
Legislative stages
  1. First reading (House of Commons)
    Jun 5, 2025
  2. Second reading (House of Commons)
    Jun 12, 2025
  3. First reading (Senate)
    Dec 11, 2025
  4. Third reading (House of Commons)
    Dec 11, 2025
  5. Second reading (Senate)
    Feb 5, 2026
  6. Third reading (Senate)
    Feb 26, 2026
  7. Royal Assent
    Mar 12, 2026