← Your dashboard·HoC · 45-1passed
Official record· LEGISinfoHouse of Commons · Bill C-5

C-5 · One Canadian Economy Act

An Act to enact the Free Trade and Labour Mobility in Canada Act and the Building Canada Act

Introduced Jun 6, 2025·Sponsor: Dominic LeBlancLPCMEDIUM
AI-assisted analysis
At a glance
  • Establishes a framework to remove federal barriers to interprovincial trade and improve labour mobility in Canada.
  • Streamlines recognition of provincial occupational authorizations, allowing easier access for workers across provinces.
  • Authorizes projects deemed to be in the national interest to move forward with simplified approvals.
Businesses involved in interprovincial tradeWorkers seeking jobs across provincesProvincial governments
AI-assisted analysis
What's actually in this bill
Why this bill matters

This bill aims to enhance trade across provinces and improve labour mobility while also designating national interest projects, which can influence government priorities. However, it may simultaneously relax certain environmental protections.

The tradeoff

The bill balances economic growth and increased trade against the risk of weakened environmental protections, potentially harming ecosystems and communities reliant on natural resources.

BROADTITLE: PARTIALA broad omnibus bill spanning 4 related subjects.
What the title leaves out

The title omits the changes to environmental regulations and the listing of national interest projects, which are significant components of the bill.

What it actually covers
trade barrierslabour mobilitynational interest projectsenvironmental regulations
PART 1Removal of federal trade barriers
What it does

This part of the bill establishes the Free Trade and Labour Mobility in Canada Act, which aims to eliminate federal barriers to the interprovincial trade of goods and services and facilitate the movement of workers across provinces by recognizing provincial qualifications. It allows goods and services that meet provincial standards to automatically meet corresponding federal standards.

Why it matters

This is significant for Canadians as it could enhance economic activity by allowing smoother trade and labour movement, potentially leading to job creation and lower prices for consumers. By reducing barriers, businesses may find it easier to operate across provincial lines, optimizing resources and expanding markets.

The problem it addresses

The bill addresses the existing federal barriers that hinder interprovincial trade and restrict the mobility of workers, creating inefficiencies in the Canadian economy.

Who benefits

Businesses and workers gain from the reduced bureaucratic hurdles, making it easier for them to trade and work in different provinces without facing conflicting regulations.

The tradeoff

The most significant tradeoff involves the potential diminished oversight of health, safety, and environmental standards, which could lead to unsafe practices if not carefully regulated, affecting public welfare.

BusinessesWorkersRegulatory bodiesConsumersProvincial governments

Amends: Free Trade and Labour Mobility in Canada Act

Read the actual text (13)
Enactment

2The Free Trade and Labour Mobility in Canada Act is enacted as follows: An Act to promote free trade and labour mobility in Canada Preamble Whereas the Government of Canada intends to remove federal exceptions under the Canadian Free Trade Agreement ; Whereas the Government of Canada wishes to continue to work with provinces and territories towards establishing a national system of mutual recognition in which a good, service or worker that meets the requirements of one Canadian jurisdiction would be recognized as meeting the requirements of all; And whereas Parliament is committed to strengthening the Canadian economy by improving labour mobility within Canada, and making it easier for businesses and Canadians to buy Canadian goods and services through the removal of federal barriers to the interprovincial movement of goods and provision of services, while continuing to protect the health, safety and security of Canadians, their social and economic well-being and the environment; Now, therefore, His Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate and House of Commons of Canada, enacts as follows: Short Title Short title 1 This Act may be cited as the Free Trade and Labour Mobility in Canada Act .

Definitions

2The following definitions apply in this Act. federal regulatory body means (a) in relation to a good or service, (i) a body that is empowered under an Act of Parliament to regulate the good or service, or (ii) a body designated by the regulations that regulates the good or service; and (b) in relation to an occupation, (i) a body that is empowered under an Act of Parliament to issue authorizations to practise the occupation, or (ii) a body designated by the regulations that issues authorizations to practise the occupation. ( organisme de réglementation fédéral ) federal requirement means a requirement established under an Act of Parliament or by a federal regulatory body. ( exigence fédérale ) Minister means the member of the King’s Privy Council for Canada designated under section 6 . ( ministre ) provincial or territorial regulatory body means (a) in relation to a good or service, (i) a body that is empowered under an Act of the legislature of a province or territory to regulate the good or service, or (ii) a body designated by the regulations that regulates the good or service; and (b) in relation to an occupation, (i) a body that is empowered under an Act of the legislature of a province or territory to issue authorizations to practise the occupation, or (ii) a body designated by the regulations that issues authorizations to practise the occupation. ( organisme de réglementation provincial ou territorial ) provincial or territorial requirement means a requirement established under an Act of the legislature of a province or territory or by a provincial or territorial regulatory body. ( exigence provinciale ou territoriale )

Act and regulations prevail

3The provisions of this Act and the regulations made under it prevail over the provisions of any other Act of Parliament and any regulations made under any other Act of Parliament to the extent of any conflict between them.

Purpose

4The purpose of this Act is to promote free trade and labour mobility by removing federal barriers to the interprovincial movement of goods and provision of services and to the movement of labour within Canada while continuing to protect the health, safety and security of Canadians, their social and economic well-being and the environment.

Binding on His Majesty

5This Act is binding on His Majesty in right of Canada.

Order

6The Governor in Council may, by order, designate a member of the King’s Privy Council for Canada as the Minister for the purposes of this Act.

Application

7Sections 8 and 9 apply in respect of a federal requirement only if the federal requirement pertains to (a) a good or service that is also subject to a provincial or territorial requirement; and (b) the interprovincial movement of the good or provision of the service.

Goods

8(1) Subject to the regulations, a good produced, used or distributed in accordance with a provincial or territorial requirement is considered to meet any comparable federal requirement. Comparable requirements (2) For the purposes of subsection (1), a provincial or territorial requirement is considered to be comparable to a federal requirement only if (a) the requirements are in respect of the same aspect or element of the good; (b) the requirements are intended to achieve a similar objective; and (c) any conditions set out in the regulations are met. Decision (3) The federal regulatory body responsible for the administration and enforcement of a federal requirement may decide, in accordance with subsection (2), whether a provincial or territorial requirement is comparable to the federal requirement.

Services

9(1) Subject to the regulations, a service provided in accordance with a provincial or territorial requirement is considered to meet any comparable federal requirement so long as the provincial or territorial requirement continues to apply to the service provider. Comparable requirements (2) For the purposes of subsection (1), a provincial or territorial requirement is considered to be comparable to a federal requirement only if (a) the requirements are in respect of the same aspect or element of the service; (b) the requirements are intended to achieve a similar objective; and (c) any conditions set out in the regulations are met. Decision (3) The federal regulatory body responsible for the administration and enforcement of a federal requirement may decide, in accordance with subsection (2), whether a provincial or territorial requirement is comparable to the federal requirement.

Recognition

10Subject to the regulations, a federal regulatory body must (a) recognize an authorization to practise an occupation issued by a provincial or territorial regulatory body as comparable to an authorization that the federal regulatory body may issue to practise that occupation; and (b) on application by the holder of such a provincial or territorial authorization, issue them an authorization to practise that occupation.

Governor in Council

11(1) The Governor in Council may, on the recommendation of the Minister, make regulations respecting federal barriers to the interprovincial movement of goods and provision of services and to the movement of labour within Canada, including regulations (a) providing for exceptions to subsection 8 (1) or 9 (1) or section 10 ; (b) imposing obligations, prohibitions, conditions and restrictions for the purposes of any of sections 8 to 10 ; (c) respecting, for the purposes of subsections 8 (2) and 9 (2), the meaning of the expressions “same aspect or element” and “achieve a similar objective” or any term used in those expressions; (d) respecting the meaning of the term “authorization” for the purposes of this Act; (e) respecting any transitional matters arising from the coming into force of this Act or of any amendments to it; and (f) respecting anything that by this Act is to be provided for by the regulations. Consultation (2) Before recommending a regulation to the Governor in Council under paragraph (1)(a) in relation to a federal requirement or authorization, the Minister must consult the federal regulatory body responsible for the administration and enforcement of the federal requirement or for the issuance of the authorization.

Acts done in good faith

12(1) Despite any other Act of Parliament, no civil action lies against His Majesty, a servant or agent of the Crown or a federal regulatory body in respect of anything done or omitted to be done, or purported to be done or omitted to be done, in good faith in the course of applying section 8 , 9 or 10 or any regulations made for the purposes of any of those sections, including anything in relation to whether provincial or territorial requirements are comparable to federal requirements and the recognition and issuance of authorizations to practise an occupation. For greater certainty (2) For greater certainty, subsection (1) does not apply in respect of applications for judicial review or to proceedings under Chapter Ten of the Canadian Free Trade Agreement .

Review and report

13Within five years after the day on which this Act comes into force, the Minister must complete a review of this Act and its operation and cause a report on the review to be laid before each House of Parliament.

Schedule 1National Interest Projects Listing
What it does

This part lists specific projects deemed to be in the national interest, providing a description for each. It creates a framework for identifying and categorizing these projects.

Why it matters

This matters because designating projects as national interest can influence funding, regulatory processes, and prioritization in government agendas. It impacts how resources are allocated and can shape economic development.

The problem it addresses

It addresses the need for clarity and organization around which projects are prioritized for national significance.

Who benefits

Entities involved in the listed projects gain from increased government support and streamlined processes.

The tradeoff

The tradeoff may involve prioritizing certain projects at the potential expense of local or regional interests that may not be included in this national framework.

Project developersGovernment agenciesLocal communitiesInvestorsEnvironmental groups
Schedule 2Repeal of certain environmental regulations
What it does

This part of the bill lists specific Acts of Parliament and regulations that are impacted, indicating their repeal or modification. It identifies various environmental and wildlife protection statutes and regulations.

Why it matters

Changes to these laws can significantly impact environmental protection efforts in Canada, affecting ecosystems, wildlife, and water resources. The public's access to clean water and healthy habitats could be at stake.

The problem it addresses

This provision seeks to amend or remove certain regulations to streamline processes or reduce bureaucratic burdens.

Who benefits

Industries and developers may benefit from reduced regulatory requirements, allowing for easier access to resources and fewer restrictions on operations.

The tradeoff

The significant tradeoff here involves a potential decrease in environmental protections and oversight, which may lead to increased harm to wildlife and ecosystems, impacting communities that rely on these resources.

Environmental organizationsWildlife advocatesIndustry developersIndigenous communitiesLocal residents
Official record· parl.ca
Official drafter summary (parl.ca)

Part 1 enacts the Free Trade and Labour Mobility in Canada Act , which establishes a statutory framework to remove federal barriers to the interprovincial trade of goods and services and to improve labour mobility within Canada. In the case of goods and services, that Act provides that a good or service that meets provincial or territorial requirements is considered to meet comparable federal requirements that pertain to the interprovincial movement of the good or provision of the service. In the case of workers, it provides for the recognition of provincial and territorial authorizations to practise occupations and for the issuance of comparable federal authorizations to holders of such provincial and territorial authorizations. It also provides the Governor in Council with the power to make regulations respecting federal barriers to the interprovincial movement of goods and provision of services and to the movement of labour within Canada. Part 2 enacts the Building Canada Act , which, among other things, (a) authorizes the Governor in Council to add the name of a project and a brief description of it to a schedule to that Act if the Governor in Council is of the opinion, having regard to certain factors, that the project is in the national interest; (b) provides that determinations and findings that have to be made and opinions that have to be formed under certain Acts of Parliament and regulations for an authorization to be granted in respect of a project that is named in Schedule 1 to that Act are deemed to have been made or formed, as the case may be, in favour of permitting the project to be carried out in whole or in part; (c) requires the minister who is designated under that Act to issue to the proponent of a project, if certain conditions are met, a document that sets out conditions that apply in respect of the project and that is deemed to be the authorizations, required under certain Acts of Parliament and regulations, that are specified in the document; and (d) requires that minister, each year, to cause an independent review to be conducted of the status of each national interest project. Available on the House of Commons website at the following address: www.ourcommons.ca

AI-assisted analysis
What MPs debatedCONTESTED262 speeches · 48 MPs · 50,507 words
Points of contention
  • Disagreement over the adequacy of consultations with Indigenous peoples
  • Concerns about the impact on environmental standards and existing laws
  • Debate over the definition of 'national interest' projects
  • Perceived overreach of federal powers at the expense of provincial rights

Conservatives and Liberals generally aligned, while NDP, Bloc, and Greens expressed serious concerns.

Where MPs stood39 MPs · grouped by party · ranked by speaking volume
AI-assisted analysis
CPC16 spoke · 2 support · 10 oppose
PL
Philip LawrenceMIXED12 speeches · 2,445 words
Criticized the limited scope of Bill C-5, arguing it will not eliminate most interprovincial trade barriers.Bill C-5 contains two pieces of legislation: one is the free trade and labour mobility act of Canada; the other is the building Canada act.
Shannon Stubbs
Shannon StubbsMIXED6 speeches · 2,321 words
Criticized the Liberals for creating a broken system that hinders resource development in Canada.Bill C-5 would not fix the fundamentals. It admits failure, with hundreds of thousands of Canadian job losses and more to come, unaffordable power and fuel, and skyrocketing costs of essentials.
Eric Melillo
Eric MelilloSUPPORTS4 speeches · 1,796 words
Argued that the creation of a new major projects office to make decisions in two years is a positive step.It is definitely a concern I have... allowing any province to have a veto really flies in the face of that.
Dan Muys
Dan MuysMIXED4 speeches · 1,736 words
Argued that while the bill has been improved through amendments, it still does not address Canada’s economic challenges effectively.While we made it better, we cannot pretend that the bill is the be-all and end-all of meeting the moment.
CA
Carol AnsteyOPPOSES5 speeches · 1,615 words
Criticized the bill for giving too much power to politicians and lacking genuine reform.What is deeply concerning is the method by which the projects of natural interest get to be selected or, thereafter, taken off the list.
Gaétan Malette
Gaétan MaletteOPPOSES7 speeches · 1,246 words
Criticized Bill C-5 for only addressing a small number of interprovincial barriers, leaving significant provincial obstacles untouched.Bill C-5 falls incredibly short of delivering true free trade and getting major projects built quickly.
Dan Albas
Dan AlbasOPPOSES3 speeches · 358 words
Criticized the lack of legal reference to the advisory committee in Bill C-5.Essentially, the Prime Minister has given a veto to every provincial premier. That means that the bill would enshrine 13 different economies by giving each provincial premier a veto.
Chris Warkentin
Chris WarkentinSUPPORTS9 speeches · 315 words
Indicated support for the bill by consistently stating that Conservatives are voting in favour.Mr. Speaker, Conservatives agree to apply the vote, with Conservatives voting in favour.
Garnett Genuis
Garnett GenuisOPPOSES2 speeches · 279 words
Argued that the bill is a temporary solution to a problem created by the Liberal government.Would it not be better to simply undo the mess Justin Trudeau created rather than abridging that process through this bill?
Kelly McCauley
Kelly McCauleyOPPOSES3 speeches · 220 words
Criticized the government's approach to pipeline projects, arguing it harms the economy.The Liberals are keeping the unconstitutional Bill C-69 , the “no new pipeline” ban; they are keeping the oil and gas cap, which is going to drive out many thousands of jobs.
SB
Steven BonkOPPOSES2 speeches · 171 words
Criticized the lack of transparency from the government regarding project disclosures.How can she go back to her constituents to say that the government is listening to the people when she knows full well that there is no transparency?
HG
Harb GillOPPOSES1 speech · 134 words
Criticized the bill for burying billions in new spending with little transparency.the government's Bill C-5 would bury billions in new spending with little transparency.
LB
Luc BertholdOPPOSES1 speech · 134 words
Argued that the Bloc Québécois does not want to fast-track important projects.it is rather troubling. We agreed on some amendments with the Bloc Québécois to ensure the government would have to comply with ethics laws.
Michael Barrett
Michael BarrettOPPOSES1 speech · 125 words
Criticized the Liberal government's track record on economic growth over the past decade.for the last 10 years, it was that member and his Liberal government, with Justin Trudeau, who introduced legislation that stymied the growth of Canada's economy
Todd Doherty
Todd DohertyOPPOSES2 speeches · 123 words
Criticized the Liberals for missing an opportunity to address healthcare in the legislation.the Liberals really missed a key opportunity with this piece of legislation.
Brad Vis
Brad VisNEUTRAL2 speeches · 95 words
Congratulated a fellow member on their first speech.What measures could we take to support the forestry sector in Canada through Bill C-5 or other initiatives here in the House of Commons?
LPC11 spoke · 9 support · 1 oppose
Kevin Lamoureux
Kevin LamoureuxSUPPORTS20 speeches · 2,992 words
Argued that Bill C-5 is essential for building one Canadian economy and addressing trade concerns.The Prime Minister , working alongside the Liberal caucus, presented legislative initiatives, such as the one that we are debating today, which was on page 1 of the election platform.
Steven MacKinnon
Steven MacKinnonSUPPORTS10 speeches · 1,989 words
Argued that Bill C-5 will remove barriers to internal trade and labour mobility, facilitating easier business operations across provinces.We are here to tell them that their vote counts. Indeed, we are here in the House, driven by a sense of urgency and a desire to serve and to fulfill our promises.
KB
Karim BardeesySUPPORTS5 speeches · 1,905 words
Argued that the bill is essential for addressing challenges in the Canadian economy amidst current international tensions.I believe this bill is essential and is a big part of our response to the tariff war, although it is not the only response.
GD
Guillaume Deschênes-ThériaultSUPPORTS6 speeches · 1,860 words
Argued that Bill C-5 is essential for unifying the Canadian economy and eliminating barriers to internal trade.Bill C-5 is a concrete example. It has been four weeks, and we are removing internal trade barriers and strengthening Canada's economy through projects of national interest.
AK
Arielle KayabagaSUPPORTS9 speeches · 427 words
Highlighted the importance of addressing interprovincial barriers for workersThis is the mandate that Canadians sent us here to carry out.
AS
Abdelhaq SariSUPPORTS2 speeches · 299 words
Argued that the bill shortens the decision-making process, reducing delays and waiting times.The bill shortens that decision-making process with less delay and less waiting.
Lori Idlout
Lori IdloutOPPOSES3 speeches · 276 words
Argued that the bill fast-tracks the violation of indigenous peoples' rights.I completely agree that there is a huge problem with the bill, specifically because of its nature and being the one bill that would fast-track the violation of indigenous peoples' rights.
MG
Mark GerretsenNEUTRAL9 speeches · 231 words
Introduced procedural consent requests regarding vote results.Mr. Speaker, I believe if you seek it, you will find consent to apply the results from the previous vote to this vote, with Liberals voting in favour.
Linda Lapointe
Linda LapointeSUPPORTS3 speeches · 227 words
Argued that the bill addresses the removal of federal barriers to internal trade and labour mobility.One of the bill's goals is to remove federal barriers to internal trade and labour mobility.
John-Paul Danko
John-Paul DankoSUPPORTS1 speech · 101 words
Congratulated LiUNA Local 837 on its contributions to the skilled trades.I completely agree with the member that we need increased labour mobility and professional mobility across provinces.
JR
Jacques RamsaySUPPORTS1 speech · 85 words
Argued that the bill allows indigenous people to participate in and benefit from projects.Bill C-5 includes this promise of a much brighter future for indigenous peoples.
BQ6 spoke · 0 support · 6 oppose
Xavier Barsalou-Duval
Xavier Barsalou-DuvalOPPOSES11 speeches · 2,337 words
Criticized the bill for containing problematic elements despite some amendments being made.Mr. Speaker, as I was saying earlier, I have been in the House for about nine years now, and I have to say, Bill C‑5 is the worst bill I have ever worked on.
SL
Sébastien LemireOPPOSES9 speeches · 2,321 words
Criticized the government's rush in passing Bill C-5 without proper consultations with first nations.This is a bill that, under the guise of reducing red tape, threatens the very foundations of Canada's constitutional order, the rights of first nations and their shared journey toward reconciliation.
Claude DeBellefeuille
Claude DeBellefeuilleOPPOSES10 speeches · 1,990 words
Criticized the bill for lacking sufficient debate and consultation with provinces and indigenous nations.I think we are being scammed. They want us to believe there is an emergency, but it does not justify this bill.
Marilène Gill
Marilène GillOPPOSES14 speeches · 1,954 words
Argued that Bill C-5 allows major project proponents to circumvent existing laws, undermining democracy.Clearly, the Bloc Québécois does not support Bill C-5.
PB
Patrick BoninOPPOSES7 speeches · 1,919 words
Criticized the bill for granting the Prime Minister excessive powers over environmental laws without a clear mandate.What is being presented today as a bill the Liberals claim Canadians are asking for goes much further than anything announced during the election campaign.
MS
Mario SimardOPPOSES7 speeches · 1,837 words
Criticized Bill C-5 for failing to address the tariff crisis affecting Quebec's aluminum industry.Frankly, it does not address that at all. In my opinion, we have to differentiate the bill's objective from the situation we are in.
NDP3 spoke · 0 support · 2 oppose
Legislative stages
  1. First reading (House of Commons)
    Jun 6, 2025
  2. Second reading (House of Commons)
    Jun 16, 2025
  3. Third reading (House of Commons)
    Jun 20, 2025
  4. First reading (Senate)
    Jun 25, 2025
  5. Second reading (Senate)
    Jun 25, 2025
  6. Third reading (Senate)
    Jun 26, 2025
  7. Royal Assent
    Jun 26, 2025
Recorded votes
passed
Bill C-5, An Act to enact the Free Trade and Labour Mobility in Canada Act and the Building Canada Act (report stage amendment) (Motion 5)Jun 20, 2025 · 170 Yea / 167 Nay · #25
defeated
Bill C-5, An Act to enact the Free Trade and Labour Mobility in Canada Act and the Building Canada Act (report stage amendment) (Motion 4)Jun 20, 2025 · 163 Yea / 174 Nay · #24
defeated
Bill C-5, An Act to enact the Free Trade and Labour Mobility in Canada Act and the Building Canada Act (report stage amendment) (Motion 1)Jun 20, 2025 · 31 Yea / 306 Nay · #23
defeated
Bill C-5, An Act to enact the Free Trade and Labour Mobility in Canada Act and the Building Canada Act (report stage amendment) (Motion 11)Jun 20, 2025 · 30 Yea / 307 Nay · #28
passed
Bill C-5, An Act to enact the Free Trade and Labour Mobility in Canada Act and the Building Canada Act (report stage amendment) (Motion 9)Jun 20, 2025 · 307 Yea / 30 Nay · #27
passed
Bill C-5, An Act to enact the Free Trade and Labour Mobility in Canada Act and the Building Canada Act (report stage amendment) (Motion 7)Jun 20, 2025 · 337 Yea / 0 Nay · #26
passed
3rd reading and adoption of Bill C-5, An Act to enact the Free Trade and Labour Mobility in Canada Act and the Building Canada Act (Part 2)Jun 20, 2025 · 306 Yea / 31 Nay · #34
passed
3rd reading and adoption of Bill C-5, An Act to enact the Free Trade and Labour Mobility in Canada Act and the Building Canada Act (Part 1)Jun 20, 2025 · 335 Yea / 1 Nay · #33
passed
Concurrence at report stage of Bill C-5, An Act to enact the Free Trade and Labour Mobility in Canada Act and the Building Canada ActJun 20, 2025 · 313 Yea / 24 Nay · #32
defeated
Bill C-5, An Act to enact the Free Trade and Labour Mobility in Canada Act and the Building Canada Act (report stage amendment) (Motion 19)Jun 20, 2025 · 31 Yea / 306 Nay · #31
passed
Bill C-5, An Act to enact the Free Trade and Labour Mobility in Canada Act and the Building Canada Act (report stage amendment) (Motion 18)Jun 20, 2025 · 337 Yea / 0 Nay · #30
defeated
Bill C-5, An Act to enact the Free Trade and Labour Mobility in Canada Act and the Building Canada Act (report stage amendment) (Motion 15)Jun 20, 2025 · 140 Yea / 197 Nay · #29
passed
2nd reading of Bill C-5, An Act to enact the Free Trade and Labour Mobility in Canada Act and the Building Canada ActJun 16, 2025 · 304 Yea / 29 Nay · #13
passed
Government Business No. 1 (Proceedings on Bill C-5, An Act to enact the Free Trade and Labour Mobility in Canada Act and the Building Canada Act)Jun 16, 2025 · 305 Yea / 30 Nay · #12
defeated
Government Business No. 1 (Proceedings on Bill C-5, An Act to enact the Free Trade and Labour Mobility in Canada Act and the Building Canada Act) (amendment)Jun 16, 2025 · 29 Yea / 305 Nay · #11